Mr DoodlebugApr 19, 2015 11:28 AM (This post was last modified: Apr 19, 2015 11:59 AM by Mr Doodlebug.)
To be even more exact it is a Civil War draft lottery machine from Ohio.
A similar draft caused bloody riots in New York.
Irish labourers thought that if the North won a war against the south, freed slaves would come up and take their jobs.
What gave them that idea? The newspapers.
(Apr 19, 2015 09:46 AM)Mr Doodlebug Wrote: CH makes a last minute dash...
When C C said Lottery i thout of a lottery that i partisipated in... which came wit-in 2 numbers of me goin to Viet Nam.!!!
On the graph... does the column of numbers on the left have to do wit population.???
Mr DoodlebugApr 19, 2015 03:51 PM (This post was last modified: Apr 19, 2015 03:53 PM by Mr Doodlebug.)
You would have thought that by the 70s they would have used a computer, but in fact they used something even less hi-tech than the village hall tombola boxes used a century before.. For the Vietnam War, they used a glass bowl.
Side Scale. Not population, but number of people doing something.
(Apr 19, 2015 03:51 PM)Mr Doodlebug Wrote: You would have thought that by the 70s they would have used a computer, but in fact they used something even less hi-tech than the village hall tombola boxes used a century before.. For the Vietnam War, they used a glass bowl.
A guy i knew had "1" drawn for him... so that part of his future was perty well planed for him.!!!
Quote:Side Scale. Not population, but number of people doing something.
Is that number of people for a State a country or the world.???
C CApr 19, 2015 10:10 PM (This post was last modified: Apr 19, 2015 10:14 PM by C C.)
(Apr 19, 2015 08:37 PM)Mr Doodlebug Wrote: [...] Side Scale. Not population, but number of people doing something. [...bottom row...] "Years of" something. Everything in the graph relates to one year. The year 2000.
IOW, it is the ages of people in the year 2000? With the other being the amount in each "age bracket" that is doing something? If so, the matter of what they are doing. The highest hump is circa 70 to 90 years. There's also a mild elevation around the time of newborns and then it goes down sharply only to ascend again.
Mr DoodlebugApr 20, 2015 12:01 AM (This post was last modified: Apr 20, 2015 12:06 AM by Mr Doodlebug.)
@CC
That is getting very close to the answer. Ages is the bottom row.
But why would the ages in the year 2000 go down sharply and then ascend again?
Ages of people doing what?
Better be quick or someone, I'm not saying who, will steal the prize.