Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Scivillage.com Join now!

Already a member, then please login:

Username
  

Password
  





Posted by: C C - Mar 17, 2026 04:21 PM - Forum: Junk Science - Replies (2)

Another journal drinks the Kool-Aid: “There is no consensus on biological sex”
https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2026/03/1...gical-sex/

INTRO: Ecology Letters, which I thought was a reasonably respectable journal, has now accepted a “viewpoint” article arguing that there is no consensus on biological sex, and that a definition based on gamete size—a consensus if ever there was one—is just viable as “multivariate” definition that incorporates a combination of chromosomes, genetics, and morphology.

They’re wrong and misguided in many ways, but, as Colin Wright notes in a tweet at bottom, there are so many mistakes and misconceptions in this paper that it would take a full reply to the journal to correct them. I’ll just tender a few comments here... (MORE - details)



Scare science: Claims about the human health dangers of microplastics are collapsing
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2026/...ollapsing/

INTRO: Since the rise of MAHA in US policy, journalists have been starting to question the findings of activist scientists, and instead of amplifying their campaigns and scary conclusions (as scandals and crises make better headlines), they are shining a spotlight on the nonsense being published, propagated and promoted on behalf of some undisclosed funders and special interests.

In particular, in 2026, journalists are starting to wake up to the poor research, bad methodology and lack of integrity of scientists publishing their insignificant findings and questionable conclusions from “research” on microplastics and nanoplastics claimed to be present in humans and the environment.

The realization of bad science was slow to arrive. The Firebreak was one of the few sources to report last October about the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) literature review that concluded that almost all published microplastic and nanoplastic studies were littered with mistakes, poor methodologies and unjustifiable conclusions... (MORE - details)

Print this item
Posted by: C C - Mar 17, 2026 04:18 PM - Forum: Zymology - Replies (1)

https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/17/trum...d-collapse

INTRO: US President Donald Trump vowed Monday to "take" Cuba as the island's national power grid collapsed under an oil embargo imposed by Washington.

"I do believe I'll be having the honour of taking Cuba," Trump told reporters at the White House. "Whether I free it, take it — think I could do anything I want with it, you want to know the truth. They're a very weakened nation right now."

Cuba's national electricity grid suffered a complete shutdown on Monday, leaving the island of 10 million people without power, according to state-owned grid operator Union Nacional Electrica de Cuba. The company said no faults were detected in operating electrical units and work had begun to restore power.

Cuba has received no oil shipments since 9 January after the US ousted Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro and imposed an effective blockade on fuel deliveries. Trump signed an executive order in January threatening tariffs against any country that sells or provides oil to Cuba.

The island's ageing electricity system already suffered daily outages of up to 20 hours in some areas. The fuel shortage has forced airlines to curtail flights, damaging the tourism sector, while the government has rationed petrol sales and some hospital services.

Trump said Sunday Cuba "wants to make a deal", which could come quickly after his administration finishes the war against Iran. "I think we will pretty soon either make a deal or do whatever we have to do," he said aboard Air Force One.

The New York Times reported Monday, citing anonymous sources, that Trump administration officials have signalled to Cuban officials they want President Miguel Díaz-Canel removed from power. Cuba's Deputy Prime Minister Oscar Perez-Oliva announced Monday that Cuban exiles would now be able to invest in and own businesses on the island.

"Cuba is open to having a fluid commercial relationship with US companies" and "also with Cubans residing in the United States and their descendants," Perez-Oliva told NBC News... (MORE - details)

Print this item
Posted by: Ostronomos - Mar 17, 2026 03:46 PM - Forum: Logic, Metaphysics & Philosophy - Replies (1)

Atheism is a delusion created by mundane happenings. Although C C fell victim to atheistic delusion she still has an opportunity to redeem herself. 

I am here to demonstrate that when the mind completely maps to reality, delusion is defeated and atheism along with it. Anyone who believes that death is the end is a living embodiment of this atheistic delusion. I possess secrets of the universe due to my mind-expanding experiences. Hence I am in a position to establish the truth not without authority, but with an ounce of reality. 

The God of monotheism is factual and therefore unequivocally real. However, with a few adjustments one can correct the flaws of religion and embrace a scientific version of this God.

Print this item
Posted by: C C - Mar 17, 2026 02:10 AM - Forum: Survivalism - No Replies

PREVIOUS INSTALLMENT: EU irony: Carbon tax used to rebuild nuclear power in Germany



SURVIVAL LILLY
https://youtu.be/4XXjZt3DTLw

VIDEO EXCERPT: While the prices here in other European countries are soaring, more than half of the diesel and gas and petrol prices are actually taxes. So in Austria we have the mineral oil tax. We also have the CO2 tax on those fuels, and also we have a value added tax which is 20%. So altogether it's more than 50%.

So it's really crazy how much the governments here in Europe have increased actually their tax revenues because the price of gas, natural gas, diesel, petrol is going through the roof.

The situation in Germany is more dramatic than ever before. The German economy faces massive challenges, job losses, high energy costs, and stagnant growth. The economic forecasts are all very bleak, especially in the international comparison. Then also fuel prices in Germany are disproportionately high...

Situation in Europe March 2026 (Part 2) ... https://youtu.be/4XXjZt3DTLw

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/4XXjZt3DTLw

Print this item
Posted by: Magical Realist - Mar 17, 2026 12:53 AM - Forum: Weird & Beyond - Replies (3)

https://people.com/famous-1967-bigfoot-f...c-11926085

"Documentary filmmaker Marq Evans had a hunch that one day he might tackle the topic of Bigfoot — but he had no idea that he’d end up creating a film that could end up debunking the mystery linked to the creature that's lasted for 59 years.

His groundbreaking documentary, Capturing Bigfoot — which premieres this week at the 2026 SXSW Film & TV Festival — provides startling new evidence, he says, that finally proves that the most famous Bigfoot film of all time is nothing more than an “incredible hoax.”

Long held up as evidence that Bigfoot exists and responsible for launching the multi-million-dollar Bigfoot industry, the iconic, shaky 59-second silent clip that was shot in 1967 shows an enormous, hairy creature — later nicknamed Patty — walking slowly through a wooded area in a forest near Bluff Creek, Calif. “It really captured the imagination of billions of people over the past six decades,” says Evans.

Shot by a former rodeo star named Roger Patterson and his pal Robert Gimlin, the Patterson-Gimlin film had, for decades, been scrutinized by biologists, anthropologists and even Hollywood costume examiners looking to debunk its authenticity. Over the years, no one had been able to definitively prove that the 16mm movie was staged.

All that began to change in June 2024 when Evans, who has directed a handful of critically acclaimed documentaries, received an email from a part-time instructor named Teresa Brooks at Olympic College, where he teaches courses in documentary filmmaking.

"After her father’s death,” says Evans, 43, “she’d found a canister of 16mm film that had been sealed away for over half a century. She needed help getting it developed and wondered if I might be interested in doing something with it.”

Little did Evans know what had just been handed to him and its possible connection to the famed 1967 film. But he soon learned that Brooks’ father, a man named Norm Johnson — who spent years running the film department for Seattle’s Boeing Company — was connected to Patterson and Gimlin through his brother Dave. And it quickly became clear to Evans that Teresa’s father had developed the Patterson-Gimlin film, which immediately made headlines around the world after the footage was released in 1967.

“It caught fire right away,” says Evans. “As somebody said in our film, ‘It went viral before that word even existed.’ ”

Brooks told Evans that the reason the film had been locked away in a safe is because her mother had feared that her husband might have been involved with a short movie that she was convinced was probably a hoax. “She was concerned,” says Evans, “that Norm might get in trouble for being involved with it and told him to put away [any evidence of his involvement] and never speak about it again.”

Not long after receiving Brooks’ email, Evans had the 16mm film developed and days later found himself looking at a 40-second clip set in a location similar to the one in the 1967 movie, showing what appeared to be a slightly skinnier-looking Bigfoot walking into the woods.

“It took me maybe nine months to realize what we really had,” says Evans, who was able to determine, by markings on the film, that the footage had been shot in 1966, roughly a year before the now-famous clip in the 59-second Bigfoot movie was allegedly shot. “What we eventually found out is that [this new footage] represented a trial run, a rehearsal that was never discarded.”

Realizing he had physical evidence that finally put to rest the question of whether Patterson’s creation was a hoax, Evans knew he had the makings for an explosive documentary. He quickly went to work, he says, “connecting the dots” behind the making of the 1967 film and interviewing the cast of characters in Patterson’s hometown of Yakima, Wash., who were involved with its creation, including 80-something-year-old Bob Heironimus, who confessed to being the individual wearing the fake Bigfoot suit in the film.

Evans, whose father had grown up in Yakima and had heard plenty of gossip among locals about the film's authenticity, assumed that the family of Roger Patterson — who died of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 1972 — would, as they always had, refuse to speak about the film, which had generated millions of dollars in licensing fees over the years. But once Evans showed the new footage to Patterson’s oldest son, Clint, a 66-year-old Montana rancher, he was eager to talk.

“He’d learned the film was a fake from his mother years earlier and had been wanting to come out and tell this story,” says Evans. “The lie had been really hard on him, and he was ready and wanting to get out from under it.”

What makes the story even more complicated and tragic, says Evans, is that Patterson, who by all accounts truly believed in Bigfoot’s existence, knew that he was dying in 1967 when he made and released his film.

“He knew he didn’t have long to live and that he was going to be leaving his wife with three young kids to take care of,” Evans says. “So he took a shot at leaving them some sort of legacy [that could possibly help pay the bills].”

The only piece of the mystery still unresolved is what happened to the Bigfoot suit that Patterson had painstakingly created. “Clint told me that he actually saw his dad burn the suit out behind the family house one night in a big barrel,” says Evans. “He basically spent about 30 minutes tossing it into the fire, piece by piece.”

Asked if he believes his documentary will finally force people to admit that Bigfoot is nothing more than a mixture of folklore, misidentified animal sightings and deliberate hoaxes, Evans isn’t optimistic.

“I certainly wasn’t some skeptic who set out to prove [Bigfoot] wasn’t real,” he says. “We were just focused on telling this story about the Patterson film. But I think for a lot of people who have so much history and belief tied up in this, it’s going to be really hard to accept.”

Capturing Bigfoot is screening at SXSW through March 16."

Print this item
Posted by: Magical Realist - Mar 16, 2026 11:05 PM - Forum: Law & Ethics - Replies (1)

Total bullshit. This most certainly will be overturned by the courts.

"In a massive blow to the first amendment, Trump administration wins its first “antifa case”. Pam Bondi made the stakes clear: "Today's verdict will not be the last."

Eight people were convicted Friday on material support for terrorism charges for attending a July 4th noise demo outside the Prairieland ICE detention center in Alvarado, Texas, the government's first use of the material support charge against alleged antifa members accused of domestic terrorism.

The conviction didn't require proof anyone committed violence. It required wearing dark clothes.
Federal prosecutors told jurors that wearing "black bloc" clothing was itself a terrorist act, that "providing your body as camouflage" constituted material support for terrorism. That's the new legal standard. Show up in black. Go to prison for 15 years.

The convictions were made possible by NSPM-7, Trump's executive order weaponizing federal law enforcement against left-wing activism. One defense attorney said it plainly: "This wouldn't be a terrorism case if it weren't for that memo."

There is no domestic equivalent to the State Department's list of foreign terror organizations, in part because organizations operating within the United States are protected by broad First Amendment rights.

Trump bulldozed that protection with an executive order designating "antifa", a decentralized umbrella term, not an organization, as a domestic terrorist group.

There is no "antifa." There is no membership card. There is no headquarters. The government invented the enemy and then convicted people of joining it.

Defense attorney Xavier de Janon put it plainly: "The federal government has signaled, successfully, that very regular protest activities could get you federally charged and federally convicted."

The National Lawyers Guild's Suzanne Adely warned the case is designed to "increase the fear, hoping that folks in other cities will think twice over protesting."

That's the point. Not justice. Deterrence. The government doesn't need to arrest everyone. They just need you scared enough to stay home.

Print this item
Posted by: Yazata - Mar 16, 2026 09:32 PM - Forum: Astronautics - No Replies

In 1899, a boy named Robert Goddard looked up into the sky and dreamed of a mighty machine that could fly to Mars. He remembered that visionary day for the rest of his life as he built his life around it.

In 1919, now a young physics professor, he published what is now recognized as a landmark paper on the physics of space travel. The New York Times ridiculed him for thinking that rockets could work in a vacuum and claimed that he failed to understand even basic Newtonian physics.

So Goddard went quiet and kept working in secret.

And on March 16, 1926 he built a spindly little contraption that flew 41 feet in the air. No newspaper covered it. Nobody beyond his immediate friends, family and colleagues even knew.

It was the world's first liquid fueled rocket.

Since then liquid fueled rockets have become the basis of space travel, just as Goddard had hoped they would. They launched the first satellites, they flew humans to orbit, they took mankind to the Moon, and they took rovers to Mars and space probes all over the Solar System.

Then...


[Image: HDiK7u0WsAAAdEQ?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Image: HDiK7u0WsAAAdEQ?format=jpg&name=medium]



Now...


[Image: GTrLYxKXQAAoZzC?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Image: GTrLYxKXQAAoZzC?format=jpg&name=medium]

Print this item

Latest Threads

Magical Realist

Artemis Stuff

Astronautics
Yesterday 09:27 PM

Yazata
Magical Realist

Launch Stuff

Astronautics
Yesterday 06:49 PM

Yazata
Magical Realist
Magical Realist