(Sep 24, 2018 02:28 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Men are taught a lot of lies about what actually attracts women, like looks, muscles (hence the "stunting"), money, being nice, etc., often from women.
So they are definitely pretty trusting of such ill-conceived advice. But considering women don't even know what they're attracted too, it's definitely dumber to be equally unaware of your own desires as someone else's. And who could expect men to know something about women that the women do not even know about themselves.
(Sep 5, 2018 05:17 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]First, you shouldn't plagiarize Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_...fs_or_Ways?
(Aug 15, 2018 08:13 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: [ -> ]A more interesting question is why have you been presenting Peterson’s arguments as if they were your own? Some of the things you’ve said are almost word for word.
(Aug 16, 2018 12:04 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe you really don't know how learning works, despite all your misandrist ranting about boys in school. When you learn something you agree with, it becomes part of you...integrated into your worldview. But most of what Peterson says is stuff I already knew.
(Sep 24, 2018 03:40 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: [ -> ]And once again...Yet again, if you don't want to engage with me, simply don't do it, moron.
....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...
Quote:No, Peterson doesn't tell those lies. But it's telling how quickly you jump to a non sequitur red herring in lieu of ANY attempt to justify that claim.(Sep 24, 2018 02:28 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Men are taught a lot of lies about what actually attracts women, like looks, muscles (hence the "stunting"), money, being nice, etc., often from women.
So they are definitely pretty trusting of such ill-conceived advice. But considering women don't even know what they're attracted too, it's definitely dumber to be equally unaware of your own desires as someone else's. And who could expect men to know something about women that the women do not even know about themselves.
Yes...yes, they are, and from men like Peterson. Let’s cut to chase, shall we, faker fox? I’m tired of being nice. Here's another little WTF?
Quote:Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.(Sep 5, 2018 05:17 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]First, you shouldn't plagiarize Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_...fs_or_Ways?
Err, the link was provided.
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-6087-p...l#pid23090
plagiarism - the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.
All of the following are considered plagiarism:
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
- https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism
Quote:Wow, you really don't know how learning works. You're just determined to prove to everyone what an utter moron you really are...or that you're just so emotional that basic reasoning skill be damned. Obviously this is just projection of your own demonstrated behavior.(Aug 15, 2018 08:13 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: [ -> ]A more interesting question is why have you been presenting Peterson’s arguments as if they were your own? Some of the things you’ve said are almost word for word.
(Aug 16, 2018 12:04 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe you really don't know how learning works, despite all your misandrist ranting about boys in school. When you learn something you agree with, it becomes part of you...integrated into your worldview. But most of what Peterson says is stuff I already knew.
What in the hell? Maybe Peterson should sue you, you little plagiarizing, mother f_____.
Quote:"But here’s the comical part. This just made me laugh, man. What were the five categories of most desirable male entity used most broadly in female pornography? It’s so embarrassing. Women you have to cover your heads while I say this.You have yet to, in all your misandrist rantings, given one solid (read substantial and unemotional) reason to disagree with, much less dislike, Peterson.
"Vampire, werewolf, billionaire, surgeon, and pirate."— Jordan Peterson
Uh...no, here’s the comical part. Why in the world would you want to plagiarize a fucking idiot? I hate his little arrogant, dorky, know-it-all laugh. He’s as dumb as a box of rocks. You might want to cover head while I say this.
Quote:"A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the Internet Tells Us about Sexual Relationships"So...your husband doesn't know how to please you? O_o
There were five pages in that book about what men are interested in and one paragraph about what women want. Imagine that…and all from the movie "Twilight" and "Fifty Shades of Grey".
The mythical male? Why would we have to invent a mythical male? Hmm…oh, I don't know. Maybe because we want someone who knows—who knows us—who knows what to do—who knows about female anatomy, hence, the mythical male. The billionaire was taught by an older female.
Quote:We already know that the majority of straight women search for lesbian porn, not vampires and werewolves. Why? Because it’s about the woman, not the man. There’s a big fat "DUH" for you. Most pornography shows us doing for you for and not the other way around. Go ahead, ask your male counterparts to show you where the clitoris is, and if you’ve read one of my previous links, you can say, "Nope, you're wrong, dumbass! Why? Because a woman on the internet felt sorry for me and provided me with this handy dandy, little link. Yeah, that’s right. She didn’t think I was smart enough to figure it out on my own. She didn’t think I was a so-called alpha male. She thinks the human alpha male is a myth. She felt sorry for me because women are more sympathetic than men."Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.
Quote:And how’s this for strength? We’ve kept you alive. We’ve guarded and protected you. We’ve loved and cared for you. You are alive because we paid attention to your every move. We watched you learn to crawl, walk, and climb. We’ve taught you about the dangers in this world. We’ve taught you when to stand up for yourself and when to walk away. The one thing that you should be grateful for, is our love, and our fierce, protective nature.And you're alive because good men protected you from bad men.
Quote:What do women want? We want someone who is our equal. What does that say about a man—a man that desires someone that they consider less than? Confidence? I think not. Insecure? Meknows so.Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous. It's either a hypocritical lie or their own ignorance of themselves. Men just know that they can never find their equal in a woman, because men and women are inherently different. Not "less than", DIFFERENT. Just like a bird and a fish cannot be equals, not because one is inferior to the other, but because they are inherently different.
Is it true what they say, that Jordan Peterson is the stupid man’s smart person? Yeah, slightly, and yet, here you are plagiarizing and mimicking him. That is absolutely fucking hilarious.
(Sep 24, 2018 01:12 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]I've asked a few women, and sizing every man up for danger sounds paranoid by comparison.
(Mar 26, 2018 11:57 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]When entering a new environment, people tend to look around a lot to assess any dangers or info they may need. They don't just dart their eyes around. They focus on each thing they see long enough to categorize its danger/usefulness.
Syne Wrote:Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.
Syne Wrote:Why else would you need a "mythical male?"
Syne Wrote:Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.
Syne Wrote:Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous.
(Sep 24, 2018 08:34 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: [ -> ]You guys losing track of the hijacked verbal jousting threads? Like a bloody virus infection. I'm a guy, you know what I want?.. How about stopping the cat fighting or starting your own personal mind to mind combat thread.Since SS started it, I'll let her be the one to stop her cross-contamination of topics.
(Sep 24, 2018 07:39 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: [ -> ]Wowee! That must have touched a little beta nerve. Lots of backpedaling there.Yet you can't show any backpedaling whatsoever.
Quote:Doubt all you like, deary.(Sep 24, 2018 01:12 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]I've asked a few women, and sizing every man up for danger sounds paranoid by comparison.
I highly doubt that.
Paranoid? Really?
Quote:Jeez, what are you on about now?(Mar 26, 2018 11:57 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]When entering a new environment, people tend to look around a lot to assess any dangers or info they may need. They don't just dart their eyes around. They focus on each thing they see long enough to categorize its danger/usefulness.
An upside down man? Hmm…I can’t think of any uses for an upside down man. Well, maybe. I’m awfully creative.
Quote:Yet you haven't, and can't, quote examples that compare "almost word for word". They don't exist, so this is just another in your very long list of baseless ad hominems.Syne Wrote:Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.
Uh..no, that would be you. Like I said, it’s almost word for word. Um…and there's still the time when you told me that you had academic training in psychology but that’s not true, is it, Syne? Watching Peterson’s YouTube videos doesn’t actually qualify as academic training.
Quote:Then quit whining about what "we want".Syne Wrote:Why else would you need a "mythical male?"
I never said that 'I' did. I have what I want. I’ve already told you that several times. Do I feel like I need to defend my husband against your ill-founded assumptions? Nope.
Quote:Yep, "printed ...material containing the explicit description...of sexual...activity". Or do you really think romance novels are all about the aesthetics? O_oSyne Wrote:Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.
No, silly boy, it is "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.'Oh, right because we’re all up in that cheesy romance shit, right? Whatever, dude. I’m a woman and we talk.
Quote:So, what, you've had sex with a guy to avoid hurting his feelings? O_oSyne Wrote:Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous.
Or maybe…just maybe you aren’t as cool as you think you are because we don’t want to hurt your feelings. Peterson strikes me as man that received one too many attaboys from his mommy. Yeah, a proper sequel to this movie would have been to really tell you what we think.
You’re stronger but we’re living in the information age, deary. Peterson said that we’re only attracted to those that win status contests. Well then, we’ll all be lesbians within one generation because you guys aren’t keeping up. Hypergamy…my ass.