Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Fascist Trump goons with guns again..
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Give trigger-happy fascist goons loaded guns and sic them on law-abiding brown-skinned people and this is what happens..

https://www.facebook.com/reel/636327362877436

Minneapolis mayor's message to ICE is short and sweet:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/26270811472502330

According to DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, the woman was allegedly "attempting to run over our law enforcement officers" when an ICE officer fatally shot her.
- https://abcnews.go.com/US/ice-related-sh...=128984401

Claiming ICE uses deadly force without provocation is exactly what prompts people to think they can get away with attacking ICE.
This is your fault.
DHS secretary and clueless MAGA bimbo is calling it "an act of domestic terrorism". There's that catchall "T word" again. Shoot to kill all "terrorists". She obviously lacks a dictionary.

Quote:Claiming ICE uses deadly force without provocation is exactly what prompts people to think they can get away with attacking ICE.

LOL! Really? Would you attack ICE if you thought they could shoot you without provocation? Tell me, what about driving away justifies the use of extreme force?

Here's the video of exactly what happened. No one was ramming ICE with their cars. There was no act of terrorism. They're lying to cover their sorry asses as usual.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/07/us/video/...lis-digvid
(Jan 7, 2026 09:58 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Claiming ICE uses deadly force without provocation is exactly what prompts people to think they can get away with attacking ICE.

LOL! Really? Would you attack ICE if you thought they could shoot you without provocation? Tell me, what about driving away justifies the use of extreme force?
If you are repeatedly told they are breaking the law and you feel morally justified to do so.
Driving directly at an officer is always justification for use of deadly force. She could have simply complied with the legal order to exit the vehicle.

Quote:
Here's the video of exactly what happened. No one was ramming ICE with their cars. There was no act of terrorism. They're lying as usual.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/07/us/video/...lis-digvid

Again, your shit eyesight fails you. The truck was driving directly at the officer who fired.
No she wasn't. He was standing off to the left side as she was steering away from him. That's why we see him shooting into the driver side window. But hell, whatever justifies trigger-happy murder eh?

I got my ANTIFA Handbook in 7th grade.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2348512228925795

Quote:If you are repeatedly told they are breaking the law and you feel morally justified to do so.

No you wouldn't. You would be far less inclined to attack someone who you thought would shoot you for no lawful reason than you would someone who you thought would only shoot you for a lawful reason. It's common sense.
(Jan 7, 2026 10:44 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]No she wasn't. He was standing off to the left side as she was steering away from him. That's why we see him shooting into the driver side window. But hell, whatever justifies trigger-happy murder eh?
Nope. Officer clearly in front of the truck. Truck turns wheels toward officer. Officer draws weapon as truck moves toward him. And officer fires as he's struck a glancing blow by the left front corner of the truck.
[Image: fenBDbV.md.png]

Quote:
Quote:If you are repeatedly told they are breaking the law and you feel morally justified to do so.

No you wouldn't. You would be far less inclined to attack someone who you thought would shoot you for no lawful reason than you would someone who you thought would only shoot you for a lawful reason. It's common sense.
Why did she think she could ignore clear and legal orders from law enforcement?
Why didn't she know that failure to comply always escalates the situation?

Or was she just so fearmongered by Democrats like you that she feared for her life... which directly caused her to put officers in danger and led to her death?
Such fearmongering causing a self-fulfilling prophesy?
Quote:Truck turns wheels toward officer.

Liar. She was clearly steering away from the officer as the video makes clear. You can even see it in the wheel positions in your 4 photos. Not steering to the left but to the right and thus clearing the officer. And in the 4th photo you can clearly see the officer is in the clear and to the left of the car which is moving at that point. That's when he shoots. When he is cleared. We call this outright murder.


Quote:Why didn't she know that failure to comply always escalates the situation?

Noone feels they will be shot just for driving away. And no law enforcement officer would ever do that.
(Jan 7, 2026 11:46 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Truck turns wheels toward officer.

Liar. She was clearly steering away from the officer as the video makes clear. You can even see it in the wheel positions in your 4 photos. Not steering to the left but to the right and thus clearing the officer. And in the 4th photo you can clearly see the officer is in the clear and to the left of the car which is moving at that point. That's when he shoots. When he is cleared. We call this outright murder.
You're delusional with obviously failing eyesight.
In the moment, no officer can assume a vehicle coming toward them is going to veer off. They have to react, to save their own lives, in the moment. Demanding that they lay down and die for people Democrats have told to "resist" is evil.

And she actually hit him. In the split-seconds to make the call, the officer has the right to defend himself. Period.
Again, all the fault of people like you.

Quote:
Quote:Why didn't she know that failure to comply always escalates the situation?

Noone feels they will be shot just for driving away. And no law enforcement officer would ever do that.
Driving toward an officer.
Quote:In the moment, no officer can assume a vehicle coming toward them is going to veer off

The 4th photo shows the smoke of the gun which is when he was shooting and was totally clear of the moving car. It wasn't moving toward him since he is standing to the left of the car facing the car and shooting into her open window. And no, the car didn't hit anyone. If she was trying to hit the officer the tires would have stayed pointing to the left. They do not. They are clearly steering to the right, where the officer wasn't at. Pure deliberate murder for just trying to leave.
Apparently you don't understand simple things, like reaction times and field of awareness in high stress situations.
The officer didn't have the time to check which way the tires were pointing as a vehicle came toward him, unlike armchair analysts like you.
He couldn't afford to take the chance to wait to see. If someone acts aggressively, by refusing to comply and putting officers at risk, they are putting themselves in danger.

Too bad you never saw active, close combat, or maybe you'd understand these simple realities.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13