(Nov 30, 2021 03:47 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 30, 2021 05:11 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Then you're either such a fucking liar or an illiterate moron. Only an incel would have one as a mentor and "incel much" literally means "are you an incel much" (as in "do you beat your wife often," i.e. the loaded question that can only assert "you beat your wife").
I never called you an incel. Your mentor? Yes, but I checked and he can't sue me here in the states. And "incel much?" Well, a question mark gets me out of libel, silly boy.
I've never accused you of libel, deary, as defamation must include damage, which you have no way to inflict. You're just a run-of-the-mill ignorant liar.
Since it's obvious you don't understand simple English, you can hardly be held accountable for how you use words. You know, like a child. You'll always just claim you didn't do it.
Seems Australian law covers loaded questions and insinuation in their defamation law, but like I've said, defamation is very hard to prove under US law.
Quote:Syne Wrote:She says, as she removed much of the quoted context.
You have yet to justify how being "perceived as strong protectors" can itself "make you stupid."
Just more of your vague arm waving when you can't justify your misandrist bullshit.
Recap...
Syne Wrote:Sure, studies done on men after decades of feminization and demonizing masculine traits, through school, culture, single-motherhood, etc..
Secular Sanity Wrote:Like anger?
Secular Sanity Wrote:An outward expression of anger has always been socially unacceptable for women, but men...not so much, and anger is an intense emotion.
Syne Wrote:And? I presume you're eventually going to get around to making some kind of point here. What, I have no idea.
"Secular Sanity Wrote:An angry woman is perceived as less competent, irrational, crazy, and unlikeable. Men, on the other hand, are perceived as strong protectors. It [anger] may be necessary for survival in some situations, but it can make you stupid.
My point was that angry men are more influential than angry women. An angry woman is perceived as emotional and not having control over her emotions.
Like I said in that thread, emotional variability has nothing to do with it. It's the difference between rational and irrational emotions. When men are angry, the reason is often very apparent because it is explicitly expressed, which gives people some ability to understand it as a possible rational response. When women are angry, they often don't even fully understand why themselves.
Where does this unexplained anger come from? What does it mean?
There may be many different causes. One explanation is that you have weak boundaries. You say yes when you really want to say no. You do things for others that you don’t feel comfortable doing. You’re constantly drained and depleted.
But you might not make the connection, said Julie de Azevedo Hanks, Ph.D, LCSW, owner of Wasatch Family Therapy and author of The Assertiveness Guide for Women: How to Communicate Your Needs, Set Healthy Boundaries, and Transform Your Relationships. “[You] may just think that people take advantage of [you] and not realize that [you] have a part in that dynamic.”
https://psychcentral.com/blog/angry-all-...t-be-why#1
Again, women who don't hold themselves accountable for the part they play are likely to be unaware of the real reasons behind their anger.
Assuming that men's anger is somehow worse, or "can make you stupid," completely ignores the fact that women often have trouble expressing their anger because they have trouble understanding it themselves. Explains a lot of your unhinged posts, SS.
Quote:"Our study suggests that women might not have the same opportunity for influence when they express anger," Salerno said. "We found that when men expressed their opinion with anger, participants rated them as more credible, which made them less confident in their own opinion. But when women expressed identical arguments and anger, they were perceived as more emotional, which made participants more confident in their own opinion."
"This effect can't be explained by women communicating anger less effectively or looking different when they express anger because we took all of that out of the equation," Salerno explained. "The effect was due to participants thinking that anger came from a man versus a woman." SOURCE
Women are known, through most people's personal experience, to be more irrationally emotional than men. It's so ubiquitous, men and women both expect it. Otherwise we'd have these studies blaming men for angry women being seen as less credible.
Brescoll said that paying emotionally neutral pays and, if you can't, at least explain what ticked you off in the first place.
https://www.medindia.net/news/are-angry-...5002-1.htm