Shadow creature filmed by security guard

[Magical Realist]

Another shadow creature caught on video by a security guard investigating noises on a plane in Mexico City:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5AFUMkSwQY

[Yazata]

The original video seemed unconvincing to me.

I mean, why was a security guard videoing himself going to investigate a noise? Why was his commentary so suggestive, seemingly intended to guide how his viewers interpreted what he showed them? Why did the video appear on a site that pays for videos?

The whole thing looked staged to me.

[Syne]

Another shadow creature caught on video by a security guard investigating noises on a plane in Mexico City:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5AFUMkSwQY

So just moving on to others, since you obviously lack the wherewithal to refute the criticisms of the first.

Too many place for an accomplice or prankster to hide for that to have any credibility.

[Magical Realist]

So just moving on to others, since you obviously lack the wherewithal to refute the criticisms of the first.

I pay no attention to flimsy complaints and post whatever I feel like. If that bothers you tough tiddy.

[Syne]

I pay no attention to flimsy complaints and post whatever I feel like. If that bothers you tough tiddy.

You ignore physics you can't be bothered to understand so you can keep believing in your fairy tales.

[Zinjanthropos]

Another shadow creature caught on video by a security guard investigating noises on a plane in Mexico City:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5AFUMkSwQY

There’s a guy on YouTube with many tutorials re photo shopping. In fact he’s considered an expert. For the record this video originates from 2016.  Coincidentally the name of the expert and the person credited with making this video have the same name....Francisco Hernandez. Now I couldn’t tell you if they are one and the same but that shouldn’t be my problem. Since you are promoting this 2nd vid as genuine then the onus is on you to inform or prove to the viewers that the photoshop expert did not shoot (or alter?) the video but someone else with same name did. Otherwise there’s no sense investigating your vid selection/claim until you’ve done that.

[Magical Realist]

Now I couldn’t tell you if they are one and the same but that shouldn’t be my problem.

Yes it would be, if you are making a claim, then it's on you to support it with evidence. I checked youtube under Francisco Hernandez and it came up with hundreds of different people. I highly doubt that your "photoshop expert" is or was employed as a airport security guard in Mexico City in 2016. But go head. You pretty much make up whatever you want in trying to debunk something. If you claim it it must be true. Right?

[C C]

The original video seemed unconvincing to me.

I mean, why was a security guard videoing himself going to investigate a noise? Why was his commentary so suggestive, seemingly intended to guide how his viewers interpreted what he showed them? Why did the video appear on a site that pays for videos?

The whole thing looked staged to me.

Any security guard who uploads a video of himself running away from or being timid with regard to signs of a potential intruder or malefactor -- because he believes it to be a ghost -- should be fired (i.e., he's not responsibly performing his duties). I mean, who would do that -- it would anger management even if it was staged (goofing off while on the job).

This really applies to the second video, though, since the guy in the first claims to have investigated three times and didn't bolt (assuming any of that was true and that was really even his job).

Also, the latter might record the 3rd trip to demonstrate to management that he was fulfilling his function, but still didn't know what to make of it under the circumstances. After receiving their permission, he might have then uploaded it. (Granting again, the information about himself and everything else was legit.)

[Magical Realist]

I mean, why was a security guard videoing himself going to investigate a noise?

This was the third time he had investigated the sound..He says he is videoing it so that others will believe him. It's an entirely appropriate and common sensical thing to do under the circumstances. It's what skeptics always complain about NOT being done often enough.

[Zinjanthropos]

Now I couldn’t tell you if they are one and the same but that shouldn’t be my problem.

Yes it would be, if you are making a claim, then it's on you to support it with evidence. I checked youtube under Francisco Hernandez and it came up with hundreds of different people. I highly doubt that your "photoshop expert" is or was employed as a airport security guard in Mexico City in 2016. But go head. You pretty much make up whatever you want in trying to debunk something. If you claim it it must be true. Right?

What have I claimed? Did I claim he was a security guard? A photoshop expert? Not me. If it’s that there’s more than one guy with same name then thanks for verifying. Just tell us which of the hundreds of Francisco Hernandez you’ve found he is. How would we know unless you spell it out? According to you, one of them made the vid. Quick look and I found another with 491 subscribers on YouTube.

Anyone see a resemblance to some of Monty Python animation/cartoon where a photo still image pops up from behind another image? This ghost doesn’t say boo, it says peek-a-boo.