Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Yes, cancel culture is affecting science papers

#1
C C Offline
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/...retraction

INTRO: Just before Christmas, the prestigious journal "Nature Communications" retracted an article that examined the informal mentorship of junior scientists. Among other findings, the paper concluded junior female scientists benefitted from male mentors more than they did female mentors. This set off a firestorm of moral indignation on social media, putting pressure on the journal which then retracted the article following a second (and very unusual) round of peer-review.

Is such a retraction warranted? Or are we seeing retraction increasingly being used by journals as censorship of unpopular conclusions in the “cancel culture” age? Wired magazine recently documented that retractions of controversial science seem to be on the increase. The Wired article made an unironic comparison to The Purge movie, acknowledging that politically charged papers are judged differently than those that are not.

Obviously, any research paper with fatal flaws should be retracted. But this shouldn’t be based on popularity or Twitter mobs. Indeed, the argument that controversial papers should get more scrutiny is an odd one, scientifically. Such an argument is a recipe for disturbing scientific inquiry, which obviously distorts the scientific record: you better find the right things with your data or else you’ll be canceled. Further, papers that support popular moral narratives are arguably as likely to do harm as those that contradict them. Bad science leads to bad policy, bad medical decisions, bad use of grant funding, promotion of societal myths, and distracts from real solutions to real problems. That’s true whether the finding is popular or not... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
stryder Offline
(Jan 12, 2021 07:26 AM)C C Wrote: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/...retraction

INTRO: Just before Christmas, the prestigious journal "Nature Communications" retracted an article that examined the informal mentorship of junior scientists. Among other findings, the paper concluded junior female scientists benefitted from male mentors more than they did female mentors. This set off a firestorm of moral indignation on social media, putting pressure on the journal which then retracted the article following a second (and very unusual) round of peer-review.

Is such a retraction warranted? Or are we seeing retraction increasingly being used by journals as censorship of unpopular conclusions in the “cancel culture” age? Wired magazine recently documented that retractions of controversial science seem to be on the increase. The Wired article made an unironic comparison to The Purge movie, acknowledging that politically charged papers are judged differently than those that are not.

Obviously, any research paper with fatal flaws should be retracted. But this shouldn’t be based on popularity or Twitter mobs. Indeed, the argument that controversial papers should get more scrutiny is an odd one, scientifically. Such an argument is a recipe for disturbing scientific inquiry, which obviously distorts the scientific record: you better find the right things with your data or else you’ll be canceled. Further, papers that support popular moral narratives are arguably as likely to do harm as those that contradict them. Bad science leads to bad policy, bad medical decisions, bad use of grant funding, promotion of societal myths, and distracts from real solutions to real problems. That’s true whether the finding is popular or not... (MORE - details)

I don't think it's so much "Cancel Culture" as Seeking attention through wokeful acts or simply put the "Hokey Cokey (wikipedia.org)". Moving something "in" and "out" of publication while drawing the attention as to the motives to why being that of how the woke has responded to it is itself a little deceitful and likely used on the most mundane of papers that otherwise would have been overlooked by peers.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article 10,000 research papers retracted in 2023 C C 0 66 Dec 30, 2023 01:16 AM
Last Post: C C
  When science influencers polarize our politics + How many fake papers? C C 3 119 Nov 8, 2023 11:04 AM
Last Post: stryder
  Article Fake scientific papers are alarmingly common C C 0 56 May 11, 2023 02:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Is peer review doomed? + AI makes sci fraud easier + Non-humans authoring sci papers C C 0 62 Mar 18, 2023 11:35 PM
Last Post: C C
  Citation count coercion + Papers less likely to replicate + EU to reform publishing C C 0 62 Mar 4, 2023 07:23 PM
Last Post: C C
  Cancel culture in science? The "ban" on Russian colleagues. C C 0 69 Mar 12, 2022 08:13 AM
Last Post: C C
  Science publisher retracts 44 papers for being utter nonsense C C 1 79 Nov 7, 2021 03:55 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Scientific publication: A vulnerable system, from fake papers to imaginary scientists C C 0 94 Jun 23, 2021 01:34 AM
Last Post: C C
  Yes, much COVID-19 research will turn out to be wrong or unreliable C C 0 286 Mar 30, 2020 06:48 PM
Last Post: C C
  Are scientific papers still reliable? Or have we compromised quality for production? C C 0 438 May 31, 2016 01:51 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)