California bars insurers from dropping policies in wildfire areas (risk analysis)

#1
C C Offline
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/05/clima...rance.html

EXCERPT: As California reels from this year’s record wildfires, the state announced on Thursday that it would prevent insurance companies from dropping homeowners for one year in many parts of the state, a sign of the growing financial turmoil caused by climate change. The measure, which applies to almost one-fifth of the state’s residential insurance market, prohibits companies from canceling or refusing to renew insurance policies for 2.1 million households in or near areas hit by this year’s wildfires.

The announcement reflects the increasing strain that climate change has placed on California, which had imposed a similar moratorium once before, at a smaller scale. As rising temperatures and longer droughts make wildfires more devastating, some insurers have responded to enormous financial losses by leaving fire-prone communities. That threatens the economies of those areas, because homes that can’t easily be insured are harder to sell, and nearly impossible to rebuild after a fire.

California’s struggles are a preview of the threat that climate change poses to the long-term economic health of communities around the country. Insurers have begun pulling back from fire-prone areas in other states across the West. And in communities near oceans or rivers, the increasing cost of flood insurance poses a similar risk, driving down home values and make them harder to sell.

In response to growing climate risks, state officials have intervened to stop insurers from leaving high-risk areas. In December, California’s insurance commissioner, Ricardo Lara, for the first time imposed a similar one-year moratorium on insurers dropping coverage for more than 1 million policyholders in or near areas affected by wildfires. Mr. Lara’s office declined an interview request. In a statement, he said the new policy “gives millions of Californians breathing room and hits the pause button on insurance non-renewals while we take additional steps to expand our competitive market.”

Still, the state’s ability to shield homeowners from the consequences of climate change is limited. The moratorium cannot be extended, which means that insurers who want to stop offering coverage in high-risk areas will eventually be able to do so. Insurers have said that if the state wants them to keep doing business in those areas, officials must make it easier to allow insurance companies to charge higher premiums, reflecting what they say is the true risk from wildfires... (MORE)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Renter protection policies found to perversely increase discrimination C C 0 445 Jul 9, 2025 04:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research “Ban-the-Box” not helping job applicants with criminal records (statistical analysis) C C 0 459 Apr 16, 2025 10:36 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Sometimes it hurts to think (meta-analysis of studies data) C C 1 620 Aug 6, 2024 03:58 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Research EU citizens feel increasingly European (data analysis) C C 0 485 May 31, 2024 02:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  The hidden motive behind U.S. voters' stance on noncitizen voting (data analysis) C C 1 565 May 21, 2024 11:24 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Are cats the most murderous & extinction-driving pets in the world? (data analysis) C C 2 627 Dec 15, 2023 03:22 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  4+ hours smartphone use tied to health risks for adolescents (statistical analysis) C C 1 522 Dec 10, 2023 10:31 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article From citizens to peasants: How California destroyed its middle class (pop. analysis) C C 2 594 Aug 5, 2023 09:05 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  Article Why AI detectors think the US Constitution was written by AI (data analysis) C C 0 446 Jul 16, 2023 03:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  Paradoxes of religion and science in the USA (data analysis) C C 2 640 Feb 14, 2023 08:37 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)