Robo-turtles in fish farms reduce fish stress (engineering cybernetics)


INTRO: A sea cage can hold up to 200,000 farmed salmon. If the cage is damaged, such as by a hole in the nets, the fish could swim out through the opening and escape in short order. Clearly, the aquaculture industry wants to avoid this scenario. Not only do escapes lead to large losses for the industry, but we also don’t want farm-raised salmon to mix and interbreed with wild populations. Keeping an eye on what is going on inside the cages is critical for being able to respond and repair any damage promptly.

Monitoring life in the cages is important for other reasons as well, such as ensuring good fish welfare: What is the health condition of the fish? How serious is the salmon lice problem? Do the cages need to be cleaned? Human divers and underwater vehicles controlled by operators on land are commonly used to check the conditions in sea cages. Both types of intruders can disrupt and stress the fish.

Robotics and biology researchers have been trying to find out which monitoring methods disturb the fish least. The tests that have a robotic turtle swimming around the cage to film the equipment and fish have proven to do the inspection job better and more gently. The experiments show that the fish are only negligibly scared or stressed by the robotic turtle. They swim calmly and fairly close to the turtle, whereas they keep away from the intruders in experiments with divers and thruster-driven underwater robots.

The video [...below...] illustrates how the fish behave differently around robo-turtles, human divers and underwater vehicles. “The overall purpose of the experiments wasn’t just to test the turtle robot, but also to investigate what characteristics robots being used in the aquaculture industry should have,” says Maarja Kruusmaa. She is a professor in NTNU’s Department of Engineering Cybernetics and at Tallinn University of Technology. “We’ve found that the most crucial characteristics of the surveillance robot are its size and speed, whereas colour and motor noise hardly matter at all,” she said.

The turtle robot’s small size and slow movements make it less disturbing to the fish. The fact that it resembles an organism that lives in the ocean is less important. “The conclusion turned out to be the opposite of our expectations. The fact that the robot looks like a marine animal doesn’t seem to play any role at all. And that’s actually good news – it means we don’t have to build the robots to be fish- or turtle-like. That will make it cheaper to develop and use robots in this new field of application to monitor marine organisms,” Kruusmaa says.

The research indicates which factors are important when developing robots for the fish farming industry or for monitoring fish in their natural setting. Kruusmaa and Jo Arve Alfredsen, an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Cybernetics at NTNU, published the article Salmon behavioural response to robots in an aquaculture sea cage in Royal Society Open Science about their findings. Kruusmaa is the first author... (MORE)

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fish stocks are not declining everywhere, contrary to pop belief (design & planning) C C 0 69 Jan 23, 2020 09:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Growing Underground farms greens in forgotten tunnels below London C C 0 432 Jul 3, 2015 05:47 PM
Last Post: C C

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)