Another (follow-up) piece at ars technica, the next day.
- - - - - -
To keep Starliner flying, Boeing must make some hard choices
https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/06/to...d-choices/
EXCERPT: . . . Boeing for a long time "nickel-and-dimed" the time engineers spent working on Starliner. This was partly due to congressional underfunding of the commercial crew program but also because Boeing did not want to put skin in the game.
This has been a poor decision in retrospect because, due to the fixed-price nature of its contract with NASA, Boeing is largely responsible for cost overruns and losses due to ongoing delays. The company now essentially has three options, none of which is particularly appealing.
Three options
The first option would be for the company to stick to its present course, spending internal funding on Starliner to complete a test flight with NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, and become certified for NASA missions. [...] One problem with this approach is that, even if Starliner achieves certification, NASA has front-loaded a lot of the $4.2 billion contract Boeing received for Starliner's final development and six operational flights. This means that once Starliner starts flying crew to the space station, Boeing is likely to continue losing money on an annual basis because NASA has previously distributed milestone payments to the company.
A second option is for Boeing to pull the plug on Starliner. When asked if Boeing management had discussed this, Nappi said, "No, not serious discussions about that." Ending the program would stanch the funding losses, but it would come with a steep price. By ending its participation in commercial crew, Boeing would be admitting defeat to SpaceX and its Crew Dragon spacecraft. This likely would mark the beginning of the end of Boeing as a major contractor in human spaceflight. The company might also have to pay back some of the money it has already received from NASA for commercial crew work.
The final option for Boeing is to double down on its investment in Starliner. It could put the kinds of resources into the program it should have five to 10 years ago and produce a safe, robust vehicle. Moreover, it must invest now to ensure Starliner has a future beyond six operational missions for NASA. For this, Boeing needs to build more crew capsules—there are just two human-rated Starliners—and find an alternative launch vehicle once the Atlas V rocket retires. (
MORE - missing details)