Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

‘We have a blind spot about how the pill influences women’s brains’

#1
C C Offline
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019...ens-brains

EXCERPT: . . . Sarah E Hill, a professor of social psychology at the Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Texas argues we need to talk about how oral contraceptives are affecting women’s thinking, emotions and behaviour. How the Pill Changes Everything: Your Brain on Birth Control is her new book about the science behind a delicate subject.

Some US states have recently made it harder to get an abortion and the Trump administration is doing its best to chisel away at access to birth control. Is your book trying to dissuade women from using the pill?

My institution was founded as a Christian school, but it doesn’t have a particular religious bent now. My goal with this book is not to take the pill away or alarm women. It is to give them information they haven’t had up until now so they can make informed decisions. The pill, along with safe, legalised abortions, are the two biggest keys to women’s rights. But we also have a blind spot when it comes to thinking about how changing women’s sex hormones – which is what the pill does – influences their brains.

For a long time, women have been experiencing “psychological” side-effects on the pill but nobody was telling them why. The backlash we are seeing against the pill, particularly with millennial women walking away from it, I think is because women haven’t felt right on it and have grown weary of doctors patting them on their heads and telling them they are wrong. The more information women have, the more it will bring them back to the pill.

[...] We know a lot about the small but serious health risks associated with the pill – things like stroke and blood clots. Why have we been kept in the dark about the effects on the brain?

Until very recently, there has been little research. And the research that is out there doctors often aren’t aware of because it isn’t being published in the medical journals they look at, but rather in psychology and neuroscience journals. Then society has taboos about talking about it. The best defence against the sexist notion that women’s hormones make them less rational than men seemed to be to deny hormonal involvement in the brain. And the pill is so useful, no one is motivated to examine it too critically. But our hormones, especially our sex hormones, are a key part of what creates the experience of feeling like ourselves. And talking critically about the pill doesn’t mean that the benefits aren’t going to outweigh the cost. It’s not antithetical to women’s rights to talk about this stuff.

How does the pill potentially affect women’s choice of mate?

Oestrogen is known to nudge women’s preferences when it comes to their romantic partners to favour qualities that are associated with masculinity and higher testosterone: square-cut jaws, broad shoulders and brow ridges, for example. But research suggests pill-taking women – in their state of artificial progesterone dominance and lacking a cyclical oestrogen urge – seem to prefer the faces of men who are less masculine. The implication is that if a woman chooses her partner when she’s on the pill and then goes off it – it might lead to relationship dissatisfaction because she no longer finds herself as attracted to the person. It is a possibility that women should at least keep in mind.

What about the mood changes women report on the pill?

Being on the pill is associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with anxiety and depression, though there are some women who report the pill stabilises their moods. The association was particulary high in young women aged 15-19 and their suicide risk is also more than twice that of non-pill takers. A dysregulated stress response is likely part of the picture, but another driver seems to be low levels of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone – a breakdown product of progesterone that acts as a natural sedative. In pill-taking women, the research suggests, levels are significantly lower than in naturally cycling women. Women starting the pill should keep a mood journal or tell a friend to keep an eye on them, especially if they have a personal or family history of mood-related symptoms. For young women, the pill may not be worth the trade-off if it is being used for reasons other than to prevent pregnancy – for example to clear acne or regulate periods.

How big are the effects you are talking about?

They are relatively small. But at an individual level, some women are going to experience big changes while others are going to have absolutely none. Each woman should know about the research that’s out there so they can monitor themselves and troubleshoot. (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
(Oct 22, 2019 04:34 AM)C C Wrote: ...the Trump administration is doing its best to chisel away at access to birth control.
Bullshit. "Access" at the cost of the constitutional right to freedom of religion is literally illegal. You can't just make up "rights" that override constitutional rights.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Gossip influences who gets ahead in different cultures C C 0 43 Apr 12, 2023 05:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Women who value self-direction tend to have more opposite-sex friendships (study) C C 0 56 Jul 7, 2022 07:21 PM
Last Post: C C
  Can’t draw a mental picture? Aphantasia causes blind spots in the mind’s eye C C 0 160 Dec 28, 2020 08:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  How to spot misogynists and misandrists Leigha 22 961 Jan 20, 2020 11:00 PM
Last Post: Leigha
  China’s CRISPR twins might have had their brains inadvertently enhanced C C 2 591 Feb 24, 2019 05:08 AM
Last Post: C C
  Becoming a Man + Cosmic gorilla effect could blind the detection of aliens C C 5 899 Apr 12, 2018 07:40 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)