Dec 17, 2018 06:50 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 17, 2018 07:01 PM by C C.)
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...121418.php
EXCERPT: People who hold radical political views - at either end of the political spectrum - aren't as good as moderates at knowing when they're wrong, even about something unrelated to politics, finds a new UCL study. The experimental study used a simple perceptual task, and the researchers found no difference between the groups on task performance, but noted that people with more radical beliefs tended to overestimate their certainty on incorrect answers, according to the findings published in "Current Biology".
"We were trying to clarify whether people who hold radical political beliefs are generally overconfident in their stated beliefs, or if it boils down to differences in metacognition, which is the ability we have to recognise when we might be wrong," said lead author Dr Steve Fleming [...] "We found that people who hold radical political beliefs have worse metacognition than those with more moderate views. They often have a misplaced certainty when they're actually wrong about something, and are resistant to changing their beliefs in the face of evidence that proves them wrong."
For the study, 381 people (in addition to 417 people in a second experiment which replicated the findings) initially completed a survey gauging their political beliefs and attitudes towards alternative world views. People on both the far left or far right of the political spectrum tended to have more radical views, involving authoritarianism and dogmatic intolerance for opposing views. [...] "An important point is that our findings held true among participants with radical views at either end of the political spectrum - radicalism appears to reflect a cognitive style that transcends political inclinations," said co-author Professor Ray Dolan...
MORE (details): https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...121418.php
EXCERPT: People who hold radical political views - at either end of the political spectrum - aren't as good as moderates at knowing when they're wrong, even about something unrelated to politics, finds a new UCL study. The experimental study used a simple perceptual task, and the researchers found no difference between the groups on task performance, but noted that people with more radical beliefs tended to overestimate their certainty on incorrect answers, according to the findings published in "Current Biology".
"We were trying to clarify whether people who hold radical political beliefs are generally overconfident in their stated beliefs, or if it boils down to differences in metacognition, which is the ability we have to recognise when we might be wrong," said lead author Dr Steve Fleming [...] "We found that people who hold radical political beliefs have worse metacognition than those with more moderate views. They often have a misplaced certainty when they're actually wrong about something, and are resistant to changing their beliefs in the face of evidence that proves them wrong."
For the study, 381 people (in addition to 417 people in a second experiment which replicated the findings) initially completed a survey gauging their political beliefs and attitudes towards alternative world views. People on both the far left or far right of the political spectrum tended to have more radical views, involving authoritarianism and dogmatic intolerance for opposing views. [...] "An important point is that our findings held true among participants with radical views at either end of the political spectrum - radicalism appears to reflect a cognitive style that transcends political inclinations," said co-author Professor Ray Dolan...
MORE (details): https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...121418.php