Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Why won’t scientific evidence change the minds of Loch Ness monster true believers?

#1
C C Offline
http://theconversation.com/why-wont-scie...vers-97307

EXCERPT: . . . To overcome the dissonance, it’s human nature to try to explain away the scientific evidence. So rather than accepting that researchers’ inability to find Nessie DNA in Loch Ness means the monster doesn’t exist, believers may rationalize that the scientists didn’t sample from the right area, or didn’t know how to identify this unknown DNA, for instance. Cognitive dissonance may also provide an explanation for other science-related conspiracy theories,

[...] If psychology may explain why Loch Ness Monster fans believe what they do, philosophy can explain what’s wrong with such beliefs.

The error here comes from an implicit assumption that to prove a claim, one has to rule out all of the conceivable alternatives – instead of all the plausible alternatives. Of course scientists haven’t and cannot deductively rule out all of the conceivable possibilities here. If to prove something you have to show that there is no conceivable alternative to your theory, then you can’t really prove much. Maybe the Loch Ness monster is an alien whose biology doesn’t include DNA.

So the problem is not that believers in the existence of the Loch Ness monster or climate change deniers are sloppy thinkers. Rather, they are too demanding thinkers, at least with respect to some selected claims. They adopt too-high standards for what counts as evidence, and for what is needed to prove a claim. Philosophers have long known that too-high standards for knowledge and rational belief lead to skepticism. [...]

One promising way to resist a skeptic is simply not to engage in trying to prove that the thing whose existence is doubted exists. A better approach might be to start with basic knowledge: assume we know some things and can draw further consequences from them.

A knowledge-first approach that attempts to do exactly this has recently gained popularity in epistemology, the philosophical theory of knowledge. British philosopher Timothy Williamson and others including me have proposed that evidence, rationality, belief, assertion, cognitive aspects of action and so on can be explained in terms of knowledge.

This idea is in contrast to an approach popular in the 20th century, that knowledge is true justified belief. But counterexamples abound that show one can have true justified belief without knowledge. [...] Our newer knowledge-first approach avoids defining knowledge altogether and rather posits knowledge as fundamental. It’s its own fundamental entity – which allows it to undercut the skeptical argument. One may not need to feel certain or have a sensation of clarity and distinctness in order to know things. The skeptical argument doesn’t get off the ground in the first place....

MORE: http://theconversation.com/why-wont-scie...vers-97307
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Ask MR about his belief in aliens.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The True Nature of God Ostronomos 0 80 Sep 23, 2023 09:56 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  3:16 interview with John Locke + Towards a planet-wide census of legs, eyes, & minds C C 0 90 Dec 10, 2022 09:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Biology won’t solve your problems with abortion (philosophy of biology) C C 1 111 Oct 7, 2021 06:51 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Mathematically, what exhibits true expression is reality Ostronomos 1 426 Feb 25, 2019 04:29 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Reality is a Reflexively True Tautological Framework Ostronomos 1 444 Jul 4, 2018 01:59 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Scientific evidence's dependence upon persuasion + Philosophy by another name C C 0 327 Apr 29, 2018 08:11 AM
Last Post: C C
  To be true to one’s self means changing to become that self C C 0 396 Sep 21, 2017 03:14 AM
Last Post: C C
  Challenge to scientific realism + Causation in scientific methods + Recent SEP update C C 3 1,496 Mar 21, 2017 03:07 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)