Nancy Cartwright´s Philosophy of Science

#1
C C Offline
https://www.thur.de/philo/project/cartwright.htm

EXCERPT: . . . According to Cartwright science can’t directly understand the order of the world. The "dappled" world shows an interacting change of many causal relations; its relation to order and laws is not immediately. We need an arrangement which filters or produces that order we know as laws. This arrangement is called "nomological machine" by Cartwright. The nomological machine is "a fixed (enough) arrangement of components, or factors, with stable (enough) capacities that in the right sort of stable (enough) environment will, with repeated operation, give rise to the kind of regular behaviour that we represent in our scientific laws" (Cartwright 1998a:2). Such a nomological machine exists in nature very seldom. The solar system is such a machine. Otherwise we have to built such a machine in our scientific work. To a nomological machine belongs the concrete material devices and the ideal models and concepts..

None of our concepts are given. We create them, and their creation is a human social enterprise with a vast number of different kinds of influences. (Cartwright 1998b: 91)

The nomological machine is a philosophical concept (Cartwright 1998a: 10), a "a way of categorizing and understanding what happens in the world". In this sense Cartwright alters empirism: There are presuppositions, which can’t be tested within the frame of the theory itself.

For the testing of causal claims at any level [...] necessarily presupposes some metaphysical assumptions that cannot be tested by the same stringent logic. (Cartwright 1989/1994:180)

MORE: https://www.thur.de/philo/project/cartwright.htm
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Emergence explains nothing and is bad science (philosophy of science) C C 1 701 Oct 16, 2025 07:11 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Is the Schrödinger equation true? (philosophy of science / mathematics) C C 1 698 Feb 21, 2024 07:08 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Should a scientist have "faith"? (philosophy of science) C C 2 947 Apr 20, 2022 09:53 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Smolin's "Einstein's Unfinished Revolution" interviews (philosophy of science) C C 1 910 Jun 13, 2019 01:03 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Incongruence between scientific facts & observations (philosophy of science) C C 1 1,054 Sep 19, 2018 07:10 PM
Last Post: Syne
  The Paradox of Karl Popper (philosophy of science) C C 1 1,279 Aug 27, 2018 07:04 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Why ecologists might want to read more philosophy of science C C 0 772 Jun 18, 2018 08:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  Seeing is not simple: You need to be both knowing & naive (philosophy of science) C C 2 1,516 May 26, 2018 03:48 PM
Last Post: C C
  Giant fish found + The case for more science & philosophy books for children C C 0 831 Jul 25, 2017 09:40 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)