Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Reality is a Subset of God

#11
Ostronomos Offline
Theory and object go by the same name because unlike conventional ZF or NBG set theory, SCSPL hologically infuses sets and their elements with the distributed (syntactic, metalogical) component of the theoretical framework containing and governing them, namely SCSPL syntax itself, replacing ordinary set-theoretic objects with SCSPL syntactic operators.  The CTMU is so-named because the SCSPL universe, like the set of all sets, distributively embodies the logical syntax of its own descriptive mathematical language.  It is thus not only self-descriptive in nature; where logic denotes the rules of cognition (reasoning, inference), it is self-cognitive as well. 

http://www.ctmu.org/Articles/IntroCTMU.htm

To put it simply: the objects or elements of reality are interrelated to its holistic structure. That is what he means by sets being hologically infused with their elements. So that the dual self-inclusive principle of objects descriptively containing reality while the overall structure topologically contains the objects makes reality a dually self-contained manifold.

The next time you witness a glitch in the Matrix such as the external world linking up to your mind, know that the CTMU explains it.
Reply
#12
Ostronomos Offline
  • According to CTMU, why are humans and other intelligent lifeforms of value to reality?
  • The CTMU says that God, as embodied by the universe, Self-configures. 
To do this, He needs two things: (1) active sensors (agents, internal  proxies) who can recognize and affect the state of the universe from  local internal vantages; (2) a stratified utility function allowing Him and His agents to prefer one possible future over another. Human beings  and other intelligent life forms are useful to God on both of these  counts. Thus, the first criterion of His development is the possibility, and in fact the inevitability, of their existence. 

To understand this, consider an extraordinarily wise child responsible  for the development and maintenance of its own body and physiology  (because the universe is in the process of self-configuration, we can  liken it to a child). To meet this responsibility, the child requires  internal sensors that provide information on exactly what is happening  deep inside its growing body, preferably at the intracellular level, and  that permit feedback. The child further requires that these sensors be  able to register the utility of what they detect... whether it is "good"  or "bad" from their own local perspectives. That way, the child can  weigh the perceptions and utilities of all of its internal sensors to  form overall developmental goals. 

In order to meet the Self-configurative goals that it sets (as  aggregates of the goals of its sensors), the child has the power to  establish internal self-optimizative tendencies that affect the behavior  of its internal agents, influencing them to perform such local  operations and make such repairs as are necessary for the good of the  whole child. To this end, they are equipped with global utility  functions, "consciences", that combine with intelligence to make them  responsive to the welfare of the whole organism (as opposed to their own  individual welfares). 

For want of a better name, we can use the term "soul" to describe the  channel through which individual and global utility functions are put in  consistent mutual contact. This channel permits the sensors to make more  informed, more global, and more valid judgments about what is "good" and  what is "bad", and gives them the internal strength to do what is good  even if it means sacrificing individual utility (because global utility  is an aggregate function of individual utility, serving global utility 
ultimately makes individuals happier). 
  • Now let’s look at some convincing cybernetic
evidence that we participate in the self-creation of reality.
Because intentional self-creation entails an internal stimulusresponse
dynamic consisting of feedback, any selfconfiguring
system needs internal sensors (agents, internal
self-proxies) capable of not only recognizing and affecting its
state from local internal vantages, but of responding to
higher-level instructions tending to enforce global structural
criteria. Moreover, the system must possess a stratified
utility function allowing it and its agents to prefer one
possible future over another. Human beings and other
intelligent life forms are useful to reality on both of these
counts. So the first criterion of reality is the possibility, and
in fact the inevitability, of the existence of “sensors” just like
us…sensors with an advanced capacity to recognize,
evaluate and respond to internal states of the system.
How, in general, would the universe self-configure? It
would select itself from a set of internally-generated,
internally-refined structural possibilities in order to
maximize its self-defined value. In the (somewhat
inadequate) terminology of quantum mechanics, this set of
possibilities is called its quantum wave function or QWF, and
the utility-maximizing self-selection principle is traditionally
called teleology. In exploiting this self-actualization
mechanism, human beings would select their specific goals
from the global QWF according to their own specific self
selection principles or “teleses”. In the course of being
realized, these individual teleses would interfere with
teleology (and each other) in a constructive or destructive
way, depending on whether they and their specific methods
of implementation (modes of interference) are teleologically
consistent or inconsistent. In this way, the “good”, or
teleologically constructive, may be distinguished from the
“bad”, or teleologically destructive. I.e., free will would give
human beings a real choice between good and evil…a choice
like that which we already seem to possess.

http://ctmudatabase.wikia.com/wiki/Accor...reality%3F
Reply
Reply
#14
Ostronomos Offline
(Jul 9, 2018 04:25 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QlG0L28NNXQ

Do great minds think alike?

Yes. And making light of the issue that we are all special does not absolve the fact that we continue to exist after we die but we cannot normally know this because we are steeped in illusion.
Reply
#15
Zinjanthropos Offline
Sorry Ostro but I don't consider you, Langan or even the sharpest Mensa member an authority on intelligence. A quote from my favorite Star Trek episode of all time, in it Spock speaks of the Organians, an evolved omniscient (?) species that can bridge the gap between the physical & pure energy form....

Quote:Mr. Spock: I should say the Organians are as far above us on the evolutionary scale... as we are above the amoeba. 

Compared to an amoeba, I (all my single cells collectively) may be special when comparing intelligences. Accept your insignificance and enjoy life ..... My philosophic wax for the day  Wink
Reply
#16
Ostronomos Offline
(Jul 9, 2018 05:11 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Sorry Ostro but I don't consider you, Langan or even the sharpest Mensa member an authority on intelligence. A quote from my favorite Star Trek episode of all time, in it Spock speaks of the Organians, an evolved omniscient (?) species that can bridge the gap between the physical & pure energy form....

Quote:Mr. Spock: I should say the Organians are as far above us on the evolutionary scale... as we are above the amoeba. 

Compared to an amoeba, I (all my single cells collectively) may be special when comparing intelligences. Accept your insignificance and enjoy life ..... My philosophic wax for the day  Wink

Insignificance or non-specialty is an illusion based on the consistency of reality. If you were to suddenly suffer a severe injury you will yearn for a God, and sometimes you may find one if you are in the appropriate realm. So I dismiss your claim from illusion.
Reply
#17
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote: If you were to suddenly suffer a severe injury you will yearn for a God

What a crock of BS. Although it doesn't surprise me, coming from a God believer. I think despite all the new  age verbiage you employ, complete with high level.vocabulary and scientific terms that you're still espousing basic theism. You can change the words but not.the message. Perceived good is credited to God whereas the bad stuff is not.. Go back to.the drawing board.

Spelunking fun...God
Untrained ..... Bad
Floods.... bad
Shelf handy.... God
Wait 9 days ...... bad
Found..... God
Rescue difficult.....bad
Experts.arrive..... God
Rescuer dies.....bad
More.rain.....bad
Decision made.... to be determined
Sick boys....bad
Sick boys first....God
4 saved ....God
4 more......God

So far appears as if God gaining upper hand. Demons representing bad have reaped only a moderate success.
Reply
#18
Ostronomos Offline
(Jul 9, 2018 06:52 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote:
Quote: If you were to suddenly suffer a severe injury you will yearn for a God

What a crock of BS. Although it doesn't surprise me, coming from a God believer. I think despite all the new  age verbiage you employ, complete with high level.vocabulary and scientific terms that you're still espousing basic theism. You can change the words but not.the message. Perceived good is credited to God whereas the bad stuff is not.. Go back to.the drawing board.

Spelunking fun...God
Untrained ..... Bad
Floods.... bad
Shelf handy.... God
Wait  9 days ...... bad
Found..... God
Rescue difficult.....bad
Experts.arrive..... God
Rescuer dies.....bad
More.rain.....bad
Decision made.... to be determined
Sick boys....bad
Sick boys first....God
4 saved ....God
4 more......God

So far appears as if God gaining upper hand. Demons representing bad have reaped only a moderate success.

What an oversimplification common to basic atheistic arguments. We cannot attribute blind nature to God. We must attribute the supernatural to God. And I am 100% confident and certain that God is real. This is an argument based on evidence and reason. You are a typical atheistic fool who says in their hearts there is no God.
Reply
#19
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote: This is an argument based on evidence and reason. You are a typical atheistic fool who says in their hearts there is no God
Still not.getting it Ostro. Believe whatever it is that you want to believe. Makes no difference to me.
Reply
#20
Ostronomos Offline
(Jul 10, 2018 07:00 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote:
Quote: This is an argument based on evidence and reason. You are a typical atheistic fool who says in their hearts there is no God
Still not.getting it Ostro. Believe whatever it is that you want to believe. Makes no difference to me.

That's fine. Your ignorance is of no consequence to me.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Virtual reality is reality, too (Chalmers) + Interview with Karl Marx + A bias bias C C 0 98 Jan 13, 2022 01:00 AM
Last Post: C C
  A reality theoretic extension of Logic/ mathematical proof of God Ostronomos 0 118 Feb 23, 2021 07:28 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Since reality is self-creative, we created reality before it creates us and vice vers Ostronomos 2 359 Oct 9, 2019 09:34 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Reality = 1 × God Ostronomos 9 722 Jun 30, 2018 05:57 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  God is the conscious universe manifesting lower levels of reality such as physical ma Ostronomos 10 1,307 Oct 30, 2017 01:16 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Reality possesses One Reality Ostronomos 15 2,621 Oct 15, 2017 12:12 AM
Last Post: Ostronomos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)