Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Philosophy of Westworld

#1
Magical Realist Offline
Binging on Westworld now on my cable's Watchathon week, I find the series hits all my profundity buttons. The nature of consciousness in relation to unconscious being. The nature of madness in self-discovery. Cultural programming and the enforcement of normalcy. The possibilities of AI. The concept of samsara and escaping the wheel of karma. The metaethics of treating androids respectfully. Evolution and the necessity of mistakes. And that's just after the first episode! Stay tuned to more "reveries"" as I plow thru the implications of this creative masterpiece by HBO.

https://futurism.media/the-philosophy-of-westworld

"Michael Crichton wrote and directed Westworld for the big screen in 1973. That same decade, in 1976, an adjunct professor named Julian Jaynes made the bestseller list with a surprising title: The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. You wouldn’t think that a book with a name like that would become such a popular success. Yet, there it was. In 2016, when Westworld came to the small screen in the re-imagined HBO series, you wouldn’t imagine Jaynes getting heard from again. Especially since bicameralism wasn’t even mentioned in the Michael Crichton’s original film. Yet, there he was. Early on in Westworld’s first season Dr. Ford, one of the creators of the park, explains how he and his co-founder Arnold used a “debunked” theory about the origins of consciousness to bootstrap A.I. The scientific community didn’t recognize bicameralism as an explanation for the origins of the human mind, but, as Dr. Ford suggests, it could be useful for building an artificial one. Thousands of people—perhaps more—started Googling for “bicameral mind.” Bloggers and YouTube channels capitalized on the sudden interest by writing articles and introductory videos about this weird, arguably psychedelic theory of consciousness. Suddenly everyone was interested.

This article isn’t going to be one of those explanation pieces, but it’s worth mentioning a few, precursory details.

According to bicameralism, human beings used to hear voices—auditory hallucinations—as a means for the right brain to “talk” with the left. Rather than having an inner monologue, the kind of self-consciousness we take for granted today, ancient people literally heard the voices of gods as their conscience, telling them what to do. This, Jaynes argues, accounts for the abundant descriptions from antiquity of gods and deities appearing all over the place, meddling directly in human affairs. Over time—about 3000 years ago—as various calamities occurred and societies got bigger, more complex, the bicameral mind broke down. The gods went silent. The modern, introspective self, quite literally, came to mind.

Jaynes may have been onto something, but even if he wasn’t, his book makes for a compelling and well-written read. The cultural zeitgeist of the 1970s, we must remember, was the high-water mark of psychedelic intrigue and “High Weirdness," with writers like Philip K. Dick and Robert Anton Wilson both having their own inextricable experiences in 1974 (see “2-3-74”). Dick would turn this encounter into the semi-autobiographical VALIS trilogy as well as his Exegesis. This brings us back to our time.

Bicameralism would have been enough to place Westworld in good, present company: Netflix’s recent Stranger Things and OA, cerebral films like Arrival, and even the metaphysical, possibly D.M.T. inspired comic book movie Dr. Strange. Just to name a few. What connects any and all of these media is pop culture’s intensifying allure to the mysteries of our own consciousness. We’re having something, as The Atlantic recently suggested, like a “metaphysical moment.” Multiple realities intersecting with our own. Deep, dark structures of the psyche spilling up into the conscious mind in the form of auditory hallucinations. The emergence of consciousness buried somewhere in archaic chapters of history. All of these subjects are in a full saturation moment through hit T.V. series, and at least flirted with in Hollywood blockbusters. Consciousness is in. (Permit a moment of conjecture, but with the increased sense of global, existential malaise around issues like climate change and political nativism, that we’ve turned inward for solutions should come as no surprise. Western culture in the 1960s and 70s, despite, or because, of being under threat of a Cold War and nuclear armageddon, produced tremendously thoughtful and visionary art.)

Westworld is a show that celebrates the kind of weird prevalent in pop culture during the 1970s: a desire to connect with those hidden recesses of the psyche that each of us have experienced in dream, creative process, and revery. “O, what a world of unseen visions and heard silences,” Jaynes writes in The Origins of Consciousness, “this insubstantial country of the mind!” When Dolores, a “host” in the park, goes on her journey of self-discovery, there’s a part of us that goes with her. It helps that Dolores, along with the other hosts in the park, experience their memories as a kind of waking dreaming, navigating altered states of consciousness and auditory hallucinations in order to succeed in their quest for liberation. We’ve all felt, quite rightly, that there is more to ourselves than our waking, conscious minds, and that if there was some way to communicate with those occluded dimensions of ourselves we could gain some inkling of wisdom (hence, I think, all the self-described “psychonauts” around today). Westworld functions like a scrying mirror for the curious audience to embark on their own journeys of self-knowledge. It is this more intangible aspect of the show—and not just Western gunslinging androids—that made it such a hit.

Jeffrey Kripal, a religious scholar, writes about this intimate link between pop culture and consciousness in Mutants and Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal.

“What makes these particular forms of American popular culture so popular is precisely the paranormal. The paranormal here understood as dramatic physical manifestations of the meaning and force of consciousness itself.”
We are drawn to the weird because the weird is showing us something about ourselves.

Elaine Pagels published The Gnostic Gospels in 1979, a book which quickly became a classic in the American spiritual counter-culture. I mention it here because of the intriguing gnostic motifs embodied so well by Dr. Ford himself. For those of who you aren’t familiar with gnosticism, or The Gnostic Gospels, these were written by early Christian sects who, speaking very generally, believed in heretical ideas. There was no single gnostic church. Philip K. Dick was drawn to their darker, paranoid theme of the false world: the idea that our reality was somehow an illusory one—a trap—created by a lesser god. A “demiurge.” The demiurge would rule over its creation and keep human souls ignorant of their spiritual birthright, lest they break through themselves in states of elevated consciousness or “gnosis.” It was, in other words, up to the individual to liberate themselves, not through reason, or faith, but gnosis. Other popular films, like The Matrix Trilogy, would take this motif and run with it quite successfully. But Westworld’s Dr. Ford plays the perfect gnostic demiurge; having created the hosts in the first place, he ensures that they stay ignorant to their own potential for self-consciousness and liberation. Trapped in their loops, and wiped of their memories, the hosts remain blissfully unaware that they are existing inside of an amusement park. (To avoid any major spoilers I’ll simply leave this cryptic remark: we know this is only partly true by the end of season one. The gnostic trap becomes a different, albeit more violent, means toward freedom. Dr. Ford, by the final episode, becomes a triumphant expounder of the gnostic doctrine: the gods won’t help you liberate yourself. Those voices were you. You are the higher being waiting to become self-illuminated. Westworld is not only about consciousness, but liberation through personal gnosis.)

The maze is an image with deep significance. Hosts in the park, when they begin to develop nascent self-consciousness, are invited to partake in a puzzle—“The Maze.” The Man in Black is repeatedly told, much to his dismay, “the maze isn’t meant for you.” It doesn’t stop him from trying. The goal is to get to the center of it, but what does this mean? Carl Jung, the Swiss psychologist responsible for developing a theory of the unconscious, and for whom the 70s spiritual counterculture would help to popularize, would immediately recognize the maze as a symbol of both the labyrinth and the mandala. Let me explain.

By entering the maze, or synonymous labyrinth (the show dangles this myth in front of us with the strange appearance of a Minotaur host), an individual embarks on a perilous journey of self-discovery. It is through surviving the perilous twists and turns of the labyrinth that the adventurer gains some a form of self-realization. Think: Luke Skywalker and Yoda’s cave in Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back. In the case of Westworld, the maze leads to consciousness, and perhaps even freedom from the park itself. Jung, if he were alive today, might smile and nod. “The goal of psychic development,” he writes in Memories, Dreams, Reflections, “is the self.” Jung adds—echoing Dr. Ford—that consciousness isn’t a pyramid but a maze: “There is no linear evolution; there is only the circumambulation of the self.” When we see the image of the maze painted on the skull of a host, early on in the season, we’re looking at a mandala: those intricately patterned mazes often leading towards some center. Jung writes, “The mandala is the center. It is the exponent of all paths… to the center, to individuation.” It is through the messy, round-about series of wrong turns that we come to consciousness. “Mistake. Mistake.” There is no straight path to the center of the maze. There is no easy way towards self-discovery. No wonder we loved this show. It turns out the maze really is meant for us."
Reply
#2
C C Offline
Took them long enough to get around to the second season (April 22).

But Westworld’s Dr. Ford plays the perfect gnostic demiurge; having created the hosts in the first place, he ensures that they stay ignorant to their own potential for self-consciousness and liberation. Trapped in their loops, and wiped of their memories, the hosts remain blissfully unaware that they are existing inside of an amusement park. [...] The maze is an image with deep significance. Hosts in the park, when they begin to develop nascent self-consciousness, are invited to partake in a puzzle—“The Maze.” The Man in Black is repeatedly told, much to his dismay, “the maze isn’t meant for you.” It doesn’t stop him from trying. The goal is to get to the center of it, but what does this mean? [...] By entering the maze, or synonymous labyrinth [...] an individual embarks on a perilous journey of self-discovery. It is through surviving the perilous twists and turns of the labyrinth that the adventurer gains some a form of self-realization.

The Frankenstein monster typically either slaying or bringing about the doom of its master slash god as part of its enlightenment at the end of its maze (self-discovery, re-conception of one's role or status in society, or literally piercing through the veil of a much broader illusion). Ordinary dreams often revise the memories of one's avatar to cover-up inconsistencies and prevent it from realizing that it's in a virtual world. Religious dogma is a sort of ideological simulation to wake-up from; and scientism as well, with its own scientific realism belief / confidence of having uncovered ultimate reality.

I'm not sure humans or even their transhuman inheritors will ever collectively "break through to some other side", but doubtless an archailect could eventually introduce its own nested level to be demiurge over (the cycle repeats). Similarly, a precursor to that is humans / cyborgs will sort of escape their traditional confinement of being at nature's mercy, will engineer their own evolution and thereby sort of "kill their creator". Becoming minor technological gods themselves in this representation of the world (an apotheosis). But rising to dominance in this realm of appearances, and one of our descendant products playing creator over its own sub-reality, isn't quite the same as literally penetrating to a stratum supposedly prior-in-rank to this one. (What makes a domain of inter-dependent phenomena and the map of those mechanistic relationships [causal structure, physicalism] possible in the first place, as Kant might put it).

~
Reply
#3
Magical Realist Offline
"We can't define consciousness because consciousness does not exist. Humans fancy that there's something special about the way we perceive the world, and yet we live in loops as tight and as closed as the hosts do, seldom questioning our choices, content, for the most part, to be told what to do next." - Dr. Robert Ford, Westworld

One aspect of Westworld I like is how it shows trauma as an agent of change in an otherwise scripted and programmed life. It is the presence of this living memory in us, this thing that makes us different, that wakes us up to a higher calling--to a level of self-awareness and spiritual connectiveness that otherwise simply escapes us in the ongoing programmed narrative of our daily existence. As Rumi put it: "Our wound is where the light enters."
Reply
#4
C C Offline
(Apr 22, 2018 05:43 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: "We can't define consciousness because consciousness does not exist. Humans fancy that there's something special about the way we perceive the world, and yet we live in loops as tight and as closed as the hosts do, seldom questioning our choices, content, for the most part, to be told what to do next." - Dr. Robert Ford, Westworld

One aspect of Westworld I like is how it shows trauma as an agent of change in an otherwise scripted and programmed life. It is the presence of this living memory in us, this thing that makes us different, that wakes us up to a higher calling--to a level of self-awareness and spiritual connectiveness that otherwise simply escapes us in the ongoing programmed narrative of our daily existence. As Rumi put it: "Our wound is where the light enters."


Like the other android hosts, that madam robot which Thandie Newton played had no clue until the residual memory glitches and past traumatic events of that role and others started leaking through.

The series can help people appreciate just how fundamental memory is to who we are and to everything we believe (not just pertaining to ourselves but even our convictions about overall reality). Manipulation / editing and selective erasure of memory by a prior-in-rank "technician level" enables residents of a nested microcosm to be completely trapped in the latter's "internal story", no matter what the inconsistencies and minor incoherence they may encounter in it occasionally. In Hollywood, such a "technician level" is always imperfect in its practices and screenings for rogue employees, for the sake of both drama and either the morality or sentimentality of the exploited population eventually obtaining its social justice.

But in our own situation we don't know if incompetence would even be possible further up in a Russian doll ontology. Where "cause / origin" becomes a hierarchical relationship, rather than that "cause-->effect" thing as expressed in time which we're most familiar with in everyday circumstances.

Much of contemporary metaphysical fiction is pretty naive in its replication of "what's going on and how things work" on this plane merely being repeated throughout the onion layers (as in *The Matrix*). To eliminate that endless regression, much older philosophy was ironically more on target by subtracting away the inter-dependent parts or mechanistic relationship furniture of a material or spatiotemporal realm till arriving at whatever seemed parsimonious for a particular era. Ultimately the latter seems to be immaterial "generative principles"[*] which can only be imperfectly represented or handled by symbols / language. There are no "pictures" since they would be size-less, non-extended, location-less, eternal, without external relationships to observers, etc (rational objects). With respect to the latter, even our stratified onion depiction of a prior-in-rank level that makes another nested one possible is yet another fatally corrupted "picture", but arguably necessary for our visual-oriented minds.

- - - footnote - - -

[*] Plato got stuck at the ideal "forms" label, which despite the abstractness still has a "geometrical picture" resonance to most ears / readers. "Formulas" or "instructions that have engendering potency" might have been better.

~
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
(Apr 22, 2018 05:43 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: It is the presence of this living memory in us, this thing that makes us different, that wakes us up to a higher calling--to a level of self-awareness and spiritual connectiveness that otherwise simply escapes us in the ongoing programmed narrative of our daily existence.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bayesianism + Philosophy of space and time + Intro to philosophy of race C C 0 77 Aug 7, 2022 03:45 PM
Last Post: C C
  Religion vs Philosophy in 3 Minutes + Philosophy of Science with Hilary Putnam C C 2 617 Oct 16, 2019 05:26 PM
Last Post: C C
  Bring back science & philosophy as natural philosophy C C 0 492 May 15, 2019 02:21 AM
Last Post: C C
  The return of Aristotelian views in philosophy & philosophy of science: Goodbye Hume? C C 1 668 Aug 17, 2018 02:01 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)