Data thugs + ‘Still working’ on the data: Astronomers explain why they don’t publish

#1
The Data Thugs
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6377/730.full

EXCERPT: When it comes to correcting problematic data in the scientific literature, styles vary. Some scientists prefer to go through "proper channels," such as private conversations or letters to the editor. Others leave anonymous comments on online forums, such as PubPeer, for airing concerns about papers. Then there is the more public approach taken by Nick Brown and James Heathers. The two researchers—Heathers has called himself "a data thug"—have been remarkably effective at uncovering problematic data—and publicly airing their concerns on websites and in the media. Their work has led to corrections to dozens of papers, and the full retractions of about 20. But although the duo concedes that their assertive style might rub some scientists the wrong way, they've attracted relatively little criticism from academic peers. Indeed, many credit them with addressing an uncomfortable problem in the science world, and even send them tips on suspect papers....

MORE: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6377/730.full



‘Still working’: Astronomers explain why they don’t publish
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/s...-t-publish

EXCERPT: . . . So Ferdinando Patat, an astronomer at ESO headquarters in Garching, Germany, says he was “quite astonished” when an earlier study on the scientific return of ESO’s Very Large Telescope in Chile showed that up to 50% of teams awarded time never published a peer-reviewed report based on their observations.

Patat wanted to understand why. He and a few ESO scientists scoured publication databases and identified 1278 projects that were awarded time [...] but which had not published anything by April 2016. They sent the project teams a questionnaire [...] They got a surprisingly high number of responses—80%—and the most common one was, perhaps unsurprisingly, “I am still working on the data.” [...] Beyond that, there was no clear winner in the excuse stakes...

MORE: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/s...-t-publish
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Has science let radiation scare us to death? (data evalution) C C 1 57 Sep 15, 2019 07:50 PM
Last Post: Syne
  5 reasons species extinction matters to business (market data) C C 0 60 Aug 30, 2019 03:20 AM
Last Post: C C
  Data: quality farm soil disappearing + Europe: syphilis up by 70% since 2010 C C 0 84 Jul 13, 2019 03:48 AM
Last Post: C C
  You live in a giant, elite galaxy: Forget that average nonsense. (data comparisons) C C 0 97 Jun 5, 2019 05:00 AM
Last Post: C C
  Experiment replication doesn't always equate to truth + Big data & breast cancer C C 0 117 May 15, 2019 02:25 AM
Last Post: C C
  More Data Can Lead to Worse Decisions, Study Shows C C 0 123 Feb 5, 2019 08:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Favourite tool for measuring implicit bias is still mired in data controversy C C 0 236 Dec 6, 2018 07:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  Amazon scrapped 'sexist AI' tool (data training) C C 1 267 Oct 10, 2018 04:50 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Data that Americans are lying about sex C C 2 340 Oct 1, 2018 10:00 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Four personality types determined based on data / algorithm C C 0 209 Sep 17, 2018 05:34 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)