Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

What Philosophy Ought to Do

#1
C C Offline
http://iainews.iai.tv/articles/what-phil...o-auid-483

EXCERPT: Philosophers should stop paying so much attention to the history of philosophy and start asking humanity's most fundamental questions.

Philosophy is unique. There is no other academic discipline that has laboured for so long under such a massive misconception as to what its basic task ought to be.

The proper basic task of philosophy is to keep alive awareness of what our most fundamental, important, urgent problems are, what our best attempts are at solving them, and what the relative merits and demerits of these attempts are. A basic task is to articulate, and improve the articulation of, our fundamental problems, and make clear that there are answers to these problems implicit in much of what we do and think – implicit in science, politics, economic activity, art, the law, education and so on – these answers often being inadequate and having adverse consequences for life and thought in various ways as a result.

Philosophy should also try to help improve our attempted solutions to our fundamental problems, by imaginatively proposing and critically assessing possible solutions, all the time making clear, where relevant, that different possible solutions have different implications for diverse aspects of life. As a result of improving our attempted solutions to our fundamental problems we may thereby contribute to the improvement of our lives, and help us make progress towards a good world.

Even though these are the proper, fundamental tasks for philosophy, it hardly needs to be said that none of these tasks can be said to be the exclusive domain of philosophy or academic philosophers. Quite the contrary, a central task of philosophy is to stimulate as many people as possible to think about fundamental problems imaginatively and critically - that is, rationally. Philosophy is not to be characterized, or delineated from other disciplines in terms of who does it, but rather in terms of the fundamental character of the problems being tackled, and perhaps the value of the contribution in question.

What, then, are our fundamental problems? Our most fundamental problem of all, encompassing all others, can be put quite simply like this:

How can our human world, and the world of sentient life more generally, imbued with the experiential, consciousness, free will, meaning and value, exist and best flourish embedded as it is in the physical universe?

[...] How can our human world ... exist and best flourish embedded as it is in the real world?

[...] Academic philosophy today does not even recognize, as a fundamental problem of the discipline: What kind of inquiry can best help us realize what is of value in life? or, to quote the title of an article of mine What kind of inquiry can best help us create a good world?...
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
I think philosophy would help us in studying our values and making us able to affirm them consciously instead of just assuming them as absolutes. None of us has chosen our values. We find them installed in us by the time we reach our 20's. So how do we validate those values? How do we know that our nationalism, or our capitalism, or our scientism, or our humanism, or our environmentalism, is a value that is really morally justified? Unless it is just a matter of deliberate choice--of deciding for ourselves which values to espouse and which to dismiss.

Philosophy can also teach us the art of critical thinking. To question everything and see if it stands on its own merits. Nietzsche taught me that. A instinct for iconoclastic reductionism of societal institutions and traditional values. Ofcourse eventually you have to stop questioning and decide on something that you regard as true and real. But even then you distrust that belief. You live your life agnostically in an uncertainty that anything is really true in the end. In my case a postmodern resignation to "If nothing's true, then all is permitted." Just play the game as long as it lasts. The play is everything.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bayesianism + Philosophy of space and time + Intro to philosophy of race C C 0 77 Aug 7, 2022 03:45 PM
Last Post: C C
  Religion vs Philosophy in 3 Minutes + Philosophy of Science with Hilary Putnam C C 2 615 Oct 16, 2019 05:26 PM
Last Post: C C
  Bring back science & philosophy as natural philosophy C C 0 492 May 15, 2019 02:21 AM
Last Post: C C
  Can an ‘ought’ be derived from an ‘is’? C C 0 334 Feb 25, 2019 03:50 AM
Last Post: C C
  The return of Aristotelian views in philosophy & philosophy of science: Goodbye Hume? C C 1 668 Aug 17, 2018 02:01 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)