The difference between the thought and the thought about

I think of an old chair in my living room. The chair in the mind is a cloud of associations, memories, and propositions that coexist in my mind. Further thought about what the chair is reveals abstract relationships, principles of science, atomic particles, cohering forces, a history of events that happened to it, and a mathematically-based spatio-temporal geometry.

Now lets examine the chair itself. I touch it and examine it. I push on its cushions and squeeze it. I sniff it. I discern defects in its materials and fabric. Stains and holes and lumps and odors and faded surfaces. The chair itself is somewhat less than ideal. The chair reveals itself incrementally thru my perceptions of it. Never revealed all at once, it is the "in itself" noumenal thing at the unraveling core of my senses and thoughts.

The chair is NOT, iow, my mere thoughts or perceptions of it. It is constituted independently of any consciousness I have of it.

Here we stand on the precipice of an infinite gap. The thought and the thought about. The chair as I think it and the chair as it is. How does one connect to the other? How does an abstract construct of my own mind come to be about and refer to an essentially unthinkable object outside of my mind? Where do they intersect?  And how is it that they reciprocally contain each other?

Being is paradoxically accessible thru an introcerebral process as the negative or blanked out locus of that process in an extracerebral continuum. Being arises as the negative terminus of the ideational construct--the unthinkable that our thought is about. Everything we know about the chair is knowledge or information in our mind. But it is knowledge and information about something that is beyond that knowledge or information--an object that exists physically and absolutely as a being in itself. Being is the source of all knowledge and information, being revealed by it while simultaneously and infinitely transcending it forever.  

[Image: old-chair.jpg]

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A single thought can influence the probability of an event occuring Ostronomos 5 553 Mar 5, 2019 02:27 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  There is no such thing as conscious thought (Peter Carruthers) C C 4 668 Dec 23, 2018 06:08 PM
Last Post: C C
  Do thought experiments really uncover new scientific truths? C C 6 708 Dec 29, 2017 11:08 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Beauty requires thought; study supports Kant's philosophical claim + Verbal thinking C C 1 499 May 12, 2017 06:09 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Are rights just legal conventions? + Difference between good & bad rhetoric C C 0 239 Apr 17, 2017 08:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Metaknowledge: Crowds aren’t as smart as we thought C C 0 274 Jul 7, 2016 03:39 AM
Last Post: C C

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)