Dog sits on editorial boards of 7 journals + Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Pseudoscience

#1
C C Offline
Dog sits on editorial boards of seven journals
https://www.doctorportal.com.au/mjainsig...y-journal/

EXCERPT: Ollie is in many ways a typical dog. [...] she has a burgeoning academic career, and sits on the editorial boards of seven medical journals. As you may have guessed, the journals on whose boards Ollie sits are of the predatory variety. These are shadowy, online publications that mimic legitimate journals, but are prepared to publish anything in exchange for a fee that can run into thousands of dollars. Predatory journals prey on desperate young researchers under huge pressure to get their research published to further their careers.

Ollie’s owner is Mike Daube [...] Wondering just how low these journals would go, he put together a curriculum vitae for his dog [...] and sent it off to a number of these journals, asking for a spot on their editorial boards. Remarkably, the vast majority accepted Ollie without demur, and her name now adorns several journal websites. Ollie is a trailblazer, Professor Daube says, being the first dog ever to get on the editorial board of a journal. “What makes it even more bizarre is that one of these journals has actually asked Ollie to review an article...."



Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Pseudoscience
http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/...caulfield/

EXCERPT: There is a direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing company that gives parents the opportunity to uncover their kids’ “hidden” talents. You can (allegedly) find out if your child has the genetic propensity for things like dancing, passion, intelligence, self-reflection and even teenage romance. The company suggests that this information is valuable because it “will help you take control and maximize the development of your child,” including personalizing “discipline strategies” and career guidance so you can maximize your “returns on your investments” (because, let’s face it, kids are a financial sinkhole).

This is all scientifically absurd, of course. And any product based on the principle of having your kids do what you tell them seems destined to disappoint. Has the marketing team ever met a teenager? But, despite the lack of evidence, these kooky kinds of DTC services continue to proliferate and have become big business....
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Rise & fall of journals + Is male/female divide a social construct? (Richard Dawkins) C C 112 12,668 Nov 12, 2025 12:34 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Consumer Reports' latest panic + What comes after gender affirmation? C C 4 371 Oct 20, 2025 05:29 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Despite challenging RFK Jr .... AAP is itself a promoter of alarmist pseudoscience C C 1 470 Jul 15, 2025 03:05 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Tests to detect marijuana-impaired driving based on ‘pseudoscience’ C C 0 331 Jun 30, 2025 03:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Anti-vaxxers: The dog that caught the car C C 1 484 Apr 24, 2025 12:50 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Research Not all ‘Predators’ are the same: Exploring the spectrum of questionable journals C C 0 409 Feb 18, 2025 07:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Tobacco funded research still appearing in top medical journals C C 0 365 May 31, 2024 02:10 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article We need fewer scientists & fewer journals + Flood of fake science spurs closures C C 0 474 May 15, 2024 04:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  How journals & academic enablers are corrupting reporting on crop biotechnology C C 0 460 Feb 2, 2024 04:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Occam's razor the only feature that differentiates science from pseudoscience? C C 3 724 Dec 20, 2023 05:21 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)