Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Goth Chicken + Voices in random noise + Science is not constantly right

#1
C C Offline
Inside the Goth Chicken: Black Bones, Black Meat, and a Black Heart
http://m.nautil.us/blog/inside-the-goth-...lack-heart

EXCERPT: [...] Almost 400 years after the Dutch tulip craze drove prices of some flowers to ridiculous heights, legions of U.S. poultry fanciers are now obsessing over another unusual breeding product: a chicken called the Ayam Cemani. The bird is inky black from the tip of its comb to the end of its claws, with blue-black skin, jet-black eyes, and a black tongue. It is covered in shimmering metallic black feathers, and even its internal organs are black. It is one Goth chicken.

[...] In his studies of domestic animal genetics, [Leif] Andersson has seen this quirk of human psychology again and again: People seek out and maintain genes that produce animals of amazing colors, even at great cost. A few years ago, his group determined that all white horses around the world share the same ancestral coat color variation. The mutation happened once in the history of horsedom, probably about 2,000 years ago, and it predisposes white horses to melanoma and a shortened life span. Nonetheless, humans maintained it and spread it around the globe.



Why We Hear Voices in Random Noise
http://m.nautil.us/blog/why-we-hear-voic...ndom-noise

EXCERPT: Pareidolia is not, however, confined to a single sensory modality. There is another form—auditory pareidolia. Concise definitions of the phenomenon remain elusive, but in clinical circles it’s usually defined relative to the more common visual form—the perception of patterns in randomness where none exist, but via an auditory mode. It’s often colloquially described byway of exemplary mishearings.

Some reported cases have stirred controversy. Take Fisher Price’s “Little Mommy Real Baby Cuddle’n Coo” doll. Presumably with no mischievous intentions, the toy company made the doll giggle, babble and coo, as babies do. But within weeks after its release in 2008, one parent misheard the doll’s babbling sound as saying “Islam is the light.” When a news network caught wind of this, a cascade of other reports ensued inciting more controversy and ultimately, the “Little Mommy Real Baby Cuddle’n Coo” was pulled from the shelves of major stores.

[...] The “reality” our minds impose on random noise, influenced by our idiosyncratic beliefs and predispositions, can also be harmful. David Smailes, currently a researcher at Sunderland University, studied cognitive and emotional aspects of psychotic-like behavior and then began research into auditory hallucinations, as part of a collective research group called Hearing the Voice. I asked Smailes about the distinction between perceiving voices while knowing they are not present, and believing they are present and real....



Science Is Not Constantly Being Proved Right
http://m.nautil.us/blog/science-is-not-c...oved-right

EXCERPT: It’s a subtle point, but the British comedian Ricky Gervais was not quite right when he told Stephen Colbert on The Late Show yesterday, “Science is constantly being proved all the time.”

Perhaps he misspoke. He was put on the defensive. Colbert, an idiosyncratic but sincere Catholic, was not really playing devil’s advocate when he challenged Gervais to an argument about the existence of God on his show. Gervais is outspoken about his disbelief and is fond of tweeting the reductio ad absurdum of various religious arguments, yet initially he seemed at a loss for how to deflect Colbert’s skepticism of the Big Bang.

When Gervais began to evoke the awe of the idea that the universe was once smaller than an atom, Colbert retorted, “But you don’t know that.”

Sigh. “Well, but…”

“You’re just believing Stephen Hawking, and that’s a matter of faith in his abilities. You don’t know it yourself—you’re just accepting that because someone told you.”

“Well but science is constantly being proved all the time,” Gervais said. “If we take something like any holy book and any other fiction, and destroyed it, okay, in a thousand years time it wouldn’t come back just as it was. Whereas if we took every science book, right, and every fact, and destroyed them all, in a thousand years they’d all be back, because all the same tests would be the same result.”

“That’s good. That’s really good.”

Yes, that is good. But it still isn’t quite right....
Reply
#2
Ben the Donkey Offline
#3 - No, "Constantly" tends to have different meanings dependant upon the listener. Or perhaps even the age of the listener... which is a topic in itself. It isn't unheard of for a word to take on a different shade of meaning within a single generation.

To me, "constantly" (or perhaps "consistently") means "much more often than not" whereas the literal definition can be taken to mean "always" according to some dictionaries, after a quick online search.

I suppose we might take some small comfort in a whole media article being based upon a "subtle point" when that same "subtle point" is basically a matter of semantics, comprehension, or communication.


The thing about the media is that that subtle point is a reason for doubt and speculation... whereas for science, that subtle point is a reason to go back and look at the data again to see where the discrepancy lies and why it might have come about.
Reply
#3
Zinjanthropos Offline
Wasn't that long ago when people heard God speak from burning bushes. 

When my oldest daughter was a first grader I heard her singing "Release Puppy Dogs", a substitute for Jose Feliciano's rendition of "Felice Navidad". Seems to be what the mind hears that's important. Amazing that it can turn any unintelligible sound into common speech. Like it just can't be satisfied until it can process something we understand.
Reply
#4
Ben the Donkey Offline
Sort of dampens any enthusiasm for appearing on chat shows, doesn't it.
Reply
#5
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Feb 7, 2017 02:45 PM)Ben the Donkey Wrote: Sort of dampens any enthusiasm for appearing on chat shows, doesn't it.

Don't know about that but what I do know is this..... if you listen real carefully to a Goth chicken it isn't saying cluck, cluck, cluck ..... it's really saying 'Black is such a happy color'. Listen next time, it's as clear as day.  Rolleyes
Reply
Reply
#7
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Feb 7, 2017 04:00 PM)Ben the Donkey Wrote: Hah!
I like you... I think.

Just keeping things in perspective. 

Your commentary style is good enough for me to repeat the quote. 

I wonder what it's called when all five senses are stimulated when for practicality sakes, there's nothing actually there?
Reply
#8
Ben the Donkey Offline
Oh, that's drugs. On which subject I'll take the fifth.

Although that question kind of reminds me of a scene from "Revenge of the Nerds" (I think)...

"What if Dog was spelled C.A.T."
"oooooh...."
Reply
#9
Magical Realist Online
Quote:Why We Hear Voices in Random Noise
http://m.nautil.us/blog/why-we-hear-voic...ndom-noise

EXCERPT: Pareidolia is not, however, confined to a single sensory modality. There is another form—auditory pareidolia. Concise definitions of the phenomenon remain elusive, but in clinical circles it’s usually defined relative to the more common visual form—the perception of patterns in randomness where none exist, but via an auditory mode. It’s often colloquially described byway of exemplary mishearings.

Some reported cases have stirred controversy. Take Fisher Price’s “Little Mommy Real Baby Cuddle’n Coo” doll. Presumably with no mischievous intentions, the toy company made the doll giggle, babble and coo, as babies do. But within weeks after its release in 2008, one parent misheard the doll’s babbling sound as saying “Islam is the light.” When a news network caught wind of this, a cascade of other reports ensued inciting more controversy and ultimately, the “Little Mommy Real Baby Cuddle’n Coo” was pulled from the shelves of major stores.

[...] The “reality” our minds impose on random noise, influenced by our idiosyncratic beliefs and predispositions, can also be harmful. David Smailes, currently a researcher at Sunderland University, studied cognitive and emotional aspects of psychotic-like behavior and then began research into auditory hallucinations, as part of a collective research group called Hearing the Voice. I asked Smailes about the distinction between perceiving voices while knowing they are not present, and believing they are present and real....

1 Kings 19:

11 So He said, "Go forth and stand on the mountain before the LORD." And behold, the LORD was passing by! And a great and strong wind was rending the mountains and breaking in pieces the rocks before the LORD; but the LORD was not in the wind. And after the wind an earthquake, but the LORD was not in the earthquake. 12After the earthquake a fire, but the LORD was not in the fire; and after the fire a sound of a gentle blowing. 13 When Elijah heard it, he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood in the entrance of the cave. And behold, a voice came to him and said, "What are you doing here, Elijah?"

When I was overdosing on diet pills many moons ago I was assaulted by a barrage of voices taunting me and complaining about me making noise all night long. Lying perfectly still in bed, around 1 AM the train would come by whistling distinctly in the distance. I called that train "God" because it was the only sound I knew was actually there. It was a call to me mercifully regrounding me in reality on those lonely haunted nights..
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The colors of noise Magical Realist 1 81 Mar 24, 2024 11:16 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)