(Jan 30, 2017 08:19 PM)C C Wrote:(Jan 30, 2017 01:06 AM)stryder Wrote: Personally I don't agree with a wall system but I've considered there might be a potential compromise, but it requires Incorporating a Town/City right on the border itself (It should have it's own rights like it was it's own small country). The concept is the city would have the wall through its centre and there would be crossing points located in the wall there. The town/City would control that point, the idea is that the city would be a bit like how Augusta is split between two states.
Are you referring to several individual towns / cities that would be split on each side of the wall (serving as gateways)? Or to one continuous urban sprawl running along both sides of the border?
I was considering Gateway cities, with a common park walled in the centre to act as a visitation place for people that aren't allowed through to the US or are too scared to leave encase they aren't allowed back in.
One thing to consider is 150-160 years ago, Mexico was 55% bigger until they lost the Mexican-American War and signed it over as apart of the peace treaty (although I'm sure they didn't intend to part with that much land, they likely didn't have the manpower to control it) In some respects the knock on effect of taking that much land is over population and the migration seen now.