Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I need help from an astrophysicist, for scientific calculations. Thank you.

#1
victorguedez Offline
Valencia, December 10, 2016


        To: The President of the United States and the President of NASA
    From: Higher Technical University in Computer Science
Subject: Idea and Invention to reach all the planets of the Solar System


I understand that you have a "Space Shuttle external tank" that weighs 762,136 kg and has 350,000 kg of hydrogen and 350,000 kg of liquid oxygen.

I invented a "Micro Rocket Nozzle" to burn 0.001 kg per second, that is, to burn 18 minutes per liter.

If we perform mathematical calculations, we obtain that its Space Shuttle external tank will last 7 years using two of my "micro rocket nozzle", creating a total force of 10 Newton.

I am not a physicist, but I read on the internet that the VASIMR plasma propellant invented by Franklin Chang-Diaz would reach the planet Mars in 40 days using 10 Newton's force. Same as my two "micro rocket nozzles" I mentioned, because they also produce 10 Newton's force.

My proposal is to use your "Space Shuttle" attached to your "Space Shuttle external tank" and put two "micro nozzle rocket" that I invented, to produce 10 Newton of force and reach the planet Mars in 40 days. 7 years of fuel will be left to reach other, more distant planets.

And take the "Space Shuttle" to several planets, without inventing another spacecraft. Just make modifications to the "Space Shuttle external tank" to put two "Micro Rocket Nozzle".

The changes are small and the idea is great.

I sell my invention of the "Micro Rocket Nozzle", in this case the size of 1 centimeter in diameter and 5 centimeter in length. Scientific changes can be made for greater force, but will remain a "Rocket Micro-nozzle".

The price is ($ 100,000,000) One hundred Million Dollars.

My email is: victor.elias.espinoza.guedez@outlook.com

Good luck getting to the planets of the Solar System.

Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

ANNEXED

I want to change the gunpowder of a machine-gun bullet, for the 0.001 liter of fuel being used by the NASA Shuttle.

So my rocket nozzle will be 1 centimeter in diameter and 4 centimeter long, like the bullet in a machine gun.

The ISP that I calculate is the same that create 2 machine guns firing, that is to say, 5 Newtons each machine gun and a total of 10 Newtons. You can add 2 more machine guns to create a 20 Newton ISP, because there would be 4 rocket nozzles the size of a machine gun. This would spend 0.004 liters of fuel per second. And it would last 3 years the external tank attached to the space shuttle.

The VASIMR propellant produces 5 Newton of force and they were going to use 2 VASIMR to push the ISS, that is to say, 10 Newton.

In conclusion:

My space propellant creates an impulse just like when we fire 4 machine guns or 2 machine guns. Each machine gun, I think creates a 5 Newton impulse. Same as VASIMR.

NOTE: They are not machine guns, but a rocket micro-nozzle the size of a bullet.

MOTE 2: Results presented in January 2011 confirmed that the design point for optimal efficiency on the VX-200 is 50 km/s exhaust velocity, or an Isp of 5000s. I think my ISP of my each miniature rocket nozzle 1 centimeter in diameter is 5000s too.

NOTE 3: The international space station weighs 450 tons and the shuttle weighs 2 tons. NASA was to use the VASIMR at the international space station using 2 5 Newton motors each according to the photo. My mini rocket nozzle also produces 5 Newtons each. However, 450 tons is greater than 2 tons, therefore produces less mass. If this is so, my miniature rocket nozzle would work by pushing the 2-tonne Shuttle. http://sen.com/blogs/irene-klotz/nasa-ni...ce-station


Why would NASA move 450 tons of weight into space using 10 Newtons of force, or 1 kilogram of force?

I think my proposal of bullets full of fuel, yes they will push the shuttle of 2 tons of weight.

I speak of weight not mass.

I do not have a scientific answer.....Does it work or not?
Reply
#2
stryder Offline
I'm sorry but selling an "idea" for One Billion USD which doesn't have any physics backing it up has caused me to move this to the Junk science subforum.

There is so many things wrong with it that I wouldn't know where to start trying to express them.
Reply
#3
RainbowUnicorn Offline
the external tank that you wish to attach the micro nozzles to, ....
where will you attach it to the space shuttle keeping in mind it will require the existing external tank & solid rocket boosters to get it up into orbit ?
thus 1 tank to get it up
1 tank to lift the tank
the tank that wishes to be lifted...
that = 3 external tanks and possibly an additional 2 or 3 solid rocket boosters.
and at that size your now working with something probably bigger than the appolo rockets with vastly increased strains on attachment points for lifting the 2 additional external fuel tanks.
keeping it super simple
you want 1 in orbit to use
you need 1 to lift it
you then need 1 to lift the shuttle
thats 3 external tanks to lift 1 into orbit
plus a few more solid rocket boosters.
fuel efficiency doesnt counteract newtonian physics requirements of gravity.
regardles of the efficiency of the micro nozzles you need a certain quantity of fuel to be expelled(& burnt) to equal the same amount of lift because the burning point speed of the liquid is required at a certain volumetric rate to equal the lifting power, just like a seesaw.
if you have discovered some ability to reduce the actual gravity or weight by a factor of lets say roughly 10, then you would be on to a winner.
still rediculousely expensive but enough to get all the space fairing countries very excited.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Who should you trust? Why appeals to scientific consensus are often uncompelling C C 0 75 Feb 16, 2024 07:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  How Do You Publish the Work of a Scientific Villain? C C 0 360 Dec 17, 2018 06:41 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)