Evolution: Is sexual selection sexist?

[RainbowUnicorn]

Syne, so i if understand you correctly, you would never support a political group, party or person who sought to litigate against homosexuality ?
is that because you feel that in turn it promotes anti religous political movement that in turns makes christianity/islam etc illegal ?
or do you have a specific moral beleif ?

Depends. Are you talking about outlawing homosexual sex, or are you talking about promoting homosexual acceptance to the exclusion of other rights? Real rights require inaction, not action, since legislated action is coercion under threat of the state.

promoting racial acceptance ?

[Syne]

Syne, so i if understand you correctly, you would never support a political group, party or person who sought to litigate against homosexuality ?
is that because you feel that in turn it promotes anti religous political movement that in turns makes christianity/islam etc illegal ?
or do you have a specific moral beleif ?

Depends. Are you talking about outlawing homosexual sex, or are you talking about promoting homosexual acceptance to the exclusion of other rights? Real rights require inaction, not action, since legislated action is coercion under threat of the state.

promoting racial acceptance ?

What are you talking about, and how does it relate to homosexuality?

[Ben the Donkey]

Syne, so i if understand you correctly, you would never support a political group, party or person who sought to litigate against homosexuality ?
is that because you feel that in turn it promotes anti religous political movement that in turns makes christianity/islam etc illegal ?
or do you have a specific moral beleif ?

Depends. Are you talking about outlawing homosexual sex, or are you talking about promoting homosexual acceptance to the exclusion of other rights? Real rights require inaction, not action, since legislated action is coercion under threat of the state.

promoting racial acceptance ?

What are you talking about, and how does it relate to homosexuality?

He's saying that sometimes coercion is a good thing. 


Coercion becomes "promotion" under some circumstances. It makes it more acceptable. Just a form of cognitive dissonance.

[RainbowUnicorn]

Syne, so i if understand you correctly, you would never support a political group, party or person who sought to litigate against homosexuality ?
is that because you feel that in turn it promotes anti religous political movement that in turns makes christianity/islam etc illegal ?
or do you have a specific moral beleif ?

Depends. Are you talking about outlawing homosexual sex, or are you talking about promoting homosexual acceptance to the exclusion of other rights? Real rights require inaction, not action, since legislated action is coercion under threat of the state.

promoting racial acceptance ?

What are you talking about, and how does it relate to homosexuality?

He's saying that sometimes coercion is a good thing. 


Coercion becomes "promotion" under some circumstances. It makes it more acceptable. Just a form of cognitive dissonance.

indeed. perceptually so. by the nature of education does one define the process of exclusion?
there is a plathora of global modernised concepts that are deemed absolutes to some cultures.
e.g is the use of monetarisation a form of exclusion ?