Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another 'What Came First' Question

#11
Secular Sanity Offline
(Dec 12, 2016 05:01 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: The moral of the story is: All that's required to remove a nice pair of genes is one little prick. 

When you think of it, one bacterium equipped with a little spear used to transfer DNA, it sounds a lot like sexual reproduction. Perhaps what we are witnessing is the evolution of the male and female of a species or how sexual reproduction originated.  Big Grin

Holy shit! You hit that one out of the park, didn’t you?

Bravo!
Reply
#12
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Dec 12, 2016 06:03 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Dec 12, 2016 05:01 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: The moral of the story is: All that's required to remove a nice pair of genes is one little prick. 

When you think of it, one bacterium equipped with a little spear used to transfer DNA, it sounds a lot like sexual reproduction. Perhaps what we are witnessing is the evolution of the male and female of a species or how sexual reproduction originated.  Big Grin

Holy shit!  You hit that one out the park, didn’t you?

Bravo!

If you get a chance to use homonyms then it's easy. Angel  Oh! That other thing too. Rolleyes
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why giant beavers died out + Feathers came first, then birds C C 0 273 Jun 3, 2019 05:47 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)