Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

That Thing You Think Is an Allegory Isn’t an Allegory!

#1
C C Offline
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books...erary.html

EXCERPT: [...] There’s one particular error I see over and over, often in criticism, that sets my teeth on edge. That’s because it flies beyond being a simple misnomer and instead misunderstands and erases an entire literary tradition, a rich and wonderful one that flowered most gloriously in the 13th century. My gripe isn’t totally arcane, I promise! Just bear with me for a moment while I get medieval on those who abuse the word allegory.

What people usually mean when they call something an allegory today is that the fictional work in question can function as a metaphor for some real-world situation or event. This is a common arts journalist’s device: finding a political parallel to whatever you happen to be reviewing is a handy way to make it appear worth writing about in the first place. Calling that parallel an allegory serves to make the comparison more forceful. Fusion says that Batman v Superman is a “none-too-subtle allegory for the fight between Republican presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.” (It is not.) The Hollywood Reporter calls Zootopia an “accidental anti-Trump allegory”—this despite the fact that there is no literary form less accidental than allegory. The meaning of the word has drifted so far that even works that aren’t especially metaphorical get labeled as allegory: A film about artistic repression in Iran is a “clunky allegory” for ... artistic repression in Iran.

Allegory or metaphor: The distinction might seem obscure and academic to many readers. Shouldn’t allegory be grateful to get any attention at all? Isn’t it just an archaic literary mode that nobody uses anymore? Yes and no. About the only people creating true allegories today are political cartoonists. But a culture never entirely discards its roots, and allegory, which first appeared in the waning years of the Roman Empire, is one of the foundations of Western literature. Maybe if we understood it better, we’d realize how much we owe to it. Besides, the allegorical imagination lives on, just not in the places where critics think they see it....
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
I find a certain looseness in interpreting stories as allegories that often may not be part of the author's original intention at all. While The Chronicles of Narnia are an obvious intended allegory of the Christian gospel, some point to the Harry Potter stories as as an allegory for the Christian battle between Christ and Satan. I hardly think Rowling had that in mind when she wrote them. We can probably find allegories in just about everything if we try hard enough. Was the LOTR an allegory of the rise of industialization and its evil effect on the environment and on the humanity and happiness of Europeans? Perhaps Tolkien meant that to be so. Or perhaps it was only unconsciously so, much as a dream is an allegory of our own inner psychic state. I say we should allow for this loosenss of subjective interpretation in allegory and metaphor. It's part of the creative effect of literature and film to appeal to deeper meanings and themes, however personally contrived on our part. It's part of what makes for good literature and film.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)