Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Internet denizenry + Inherent hierarchal nature of social media

#1
C C Offline
Internet Denizenry
http://chrisgammell.com/internet-denizenry/

EXCERPT: [...] On a broader level, this starts to make me question the idea of location and citizenship at all. Hopefully I don’t sound ungrateful for the comforts a US passport and background affords me. But now that I start to experience similar daily experience in and out of work and an overall convergent culture and I start to wonder what differentiates one country over another. On the surface it seems like:

Currency
Power standards (plugs, voltages)
Language (though I benefit from the world moving towards an English standard)
Tax structures, bureaucratic struggles and the services the pay for, such as healthcare.

Yes, this is a drastic oversimplification. But calling out these things as some of the large differentiating points, I really wonder what a “internet” passport and citizenship would look like, some kind of new world order simplified across all the willing participants of the web. Not just a tax haven and a lack of regulation (looking at you SeaLand), but an actual society of people that are living and working online. A government run by hackers and makers, optimized for low overhead and allowing maximum flexibility between the various geographies of the world. It would probably be a mess, but allows for an interesting thought experiment. Where would move people choose to live in the real world? How would that further impact culture? What defines citizenship in the first place?...



Your friends have more friends than you do: Research uncovers the inherently hierarchical nature of social media
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...170436.htm

RELEASE: No matter how smart and funny you think you are, those you follow on Twitter really do have a larger following than you. And the same holds true for Facebook. But there is no reason to feel badly about any of this, according to Naghmeh Momeni Taramsari, who is currently working on her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at McGill University. According to her research, which was published earlier this spring in the journal PLOS ONE, it is all due to the inherently hierarchical nature of social media networks, where, in the social hierarchy of connections, people mostly either follow up or across; they rarely follow down.

"Most people tend to think that they are better than their friends when it comes to intelligence, memory, popularity, and other personal traits," says Taramsari. "However, a recent study by other researchers shows that this perception is false, at least in the context of online social networks. In reality, our friends really have more friends than we do, on average. Moreover, our friends are more active (post more material), and are more influential (their posts are viewed and passed on more often). This is known as the Generalized Friendship Paradox."

So the McGill researchers set out to discover to what extent the friendship paradox is present in the online social network Twitter, and how exactly it is reflected in the network structure (as in, who follows whom).

You may be less popular, but you're not alone

In case you are starting to feel discouraged about it, don't worry. After using new methods to measure user influence and the extent to which the Generalized Friendship Paradox exists in social networks, a research team has concluded that almost all users (up to 90 per cent of us) experience this paradox -- even those with relatively high levels of activity and influence.

That's because people at any level of activity and influence tend to follow others who are more active and influential than themselves, according to Prof. Michael Rabbat, who teaches in McGill's Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering and is the senior author on the paper.

"Social networks do not simply comprise a few ultra-popular people with tens of millions of followers, followed by the masses, and who themselves only follow a few others," says Rabbat. "Rather, Twitter is hierarchical in the following sense: those who have millions of connections mostly follow others with million connections. Those with thousands of connections mostly follow others with thousands or millions of connections. Those with a few connections follows others with few, thousands, or millions of connections. Apparently, it's just the way we're connected."

In the end, even online, it's because we all want to be friends with the popular kids..
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Social media use linked to inflammation levels, study finds C C 1 20 Jan 8, 2024 02:37 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Research Right-wing social media benefited from high-profile bans on mainstream platforms C C 1 111 Oct 26, 2023 11:32 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Internet access must become human right or we risk ever-widening inequality C C 1 70 Apr 10, 2023 12:46 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Social media is saving you from profound levels of boredom and it's a problem C C 8 278 Jan 2, 2023 10:46 PM
Last Post: Leigha
  The most vulnerable place on the internet C C 0 113 Nov 7, 2022 09:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  How to stop doomscrolling news and social media C C 4 191 Jan 5, 2022 12:07 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Are people lying more since the rise of social media and smartphones? C C 0 71 Nov 16, 2021 09:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  The dark side of social media networks C C 0 78 Oct 14, 2021 04:24 PM
Last Post: C C
  Can democracy work on the internet? Leigha 0 100 Aug 19, 2021 09:30 PM
Last Post: Leigha
  Social media's rewards magnify expressions of outrage C C 1 100 Aug 17, 2021 05:45 PM
Last Post: Leigha



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)