Intelligence rotating between biological beings & machine receptacles for aeons

#1
C C Offline
https://aeon.co/essays/intelligent-machi...ical-again

EXCERPT: . . . Superficially, the logic behind the conjectures about cosmic machine intelligence appears pretty solid. Extrapolating the trajectory of our own current technological evolution suggests that with enough computational sophistication on hand, the capacity and capability of our biological minds and bodies could become less and less attractive. At a certain point we’d want to hop into new receptacles, custom-built to suit whatever takes our fancy. Similarly, that technological arc could take us to a place where we’ll create artificial intelligences that are either indifferent to us, or that will overtake and subsume (or simply squish) us.

Biology is not up to the task of sustaining pan-stellar civilisations or the far-future human civilisation, the argument goes. The environmental and temporal challenges of space exploration are huge. Any realistic impetus to become an interstellar species might demand robust machines, not delicate protein complexes with fairly pathetic use-by dates. A machine might live forever and copy itself perfectly, unencumbered by the error-prone flexibility of natural evolution. Self-designing life forms could also tailor themselves to very specific environments. In a single generation they could adapt to the great gulfs of time and space between the stars, or to the environments of alien worlds.

Pull all of these pieces together and it can certainly seem that the human blueprint is a blip, a quickly passing phase. People take this analysis seriously enough that influential figures such as Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have publicly warned about the dangers of all-consuming artificial intelligence. At the same time, the computer scientist Ray Kurzweil has made a big splash from books and conferences that preview an impending singularity. But are living things really compelled to become ever-smarter and more robust? And is biological intelligence really a universal dead-end, destined to give way to machine supremacy?

Perhaps not. There is quite a bit more to the story....
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Melbourne start-up launches 'biological computer' made of human brain cells C C 0 730 Mar 5, 2025 07:02 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Reducing the cultural bias of AI with one sentence (decolonizing the machine) C C 0 403 Sep 17, 2024 11:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Want to find UFOs? That's a job for machine learning C C 1 445 Aug 22, 2023 10:25 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Solving a machine-learning mystery + Can pigeons match wits with AI? C C 0 325 Feb 13, 2023 07:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  New technology to reduce potholes (machine learning technique) C C 0 403 Nov 5, 2022 04:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Dealing with online toxic speech by selecting the decision makers (machine learning) C C 0 284 Jun 8, 2022 07:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  Machine learning reimagines the building blocks of computing C C 0 330 Mar 16, 2022 05:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  10 ways to apply machine learning in Earth & space sciences + Edge of chaos C C 0 349 Jun 29, 2021 11:08 PM
Last Post: C C
  Machine learning accelerates cosmological simulations C C 0 329 May 5, 2021 12:24 AM
Last Post: C C
  Machine learning is shaking up the world of earthquake prediction C C 0 382 Feb 15, 2021 05:51 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)