Secretary Hogsweat's live streamed public execution

[Magical Realist]

LOL Frantically throwing anything that will stick to the wall at this point. So sad. So what happens if you don't catch me on something in time? Do you turn into a tiny rat turd?

[Syne]

Okay, okay. It's clear you're just going to deflect endlessly... because you can't justify your nonsense.
But I agree, it is sad. Sad when people say stupid things and then run to the hills, rather than just admit "I misspoke," like an adult.

[Magical Realist]

Time's up! lol

[Image: images-2026-10-09T205830-699.jpg]

[Syne]

Keep digging.
Except you could spare us your scatophilia.

[Magical Realist]

[Image: images-2026-10-09T205830-699.jpg]

[Syne]

Someone smack MR. He's stuck on repeat again.

[stryder]

No, parents are not any more likely to let children watch just because they are Trump supporters. [i]That guilt by association fallacy is a sign of your TDS.

Your admission has the hallmarks of a psychopath. This isn't about some DsMDS (Dipshit Meme Derangement Syndrome) this is about how society is being warp to be more like psychopaths and sycophants by DsMDS being displayed inappropriately.

Would such sickos not already have access to much more graphic examples? Or... are you speaking from personal knowledge? @_@

It shouldn't be easy for sickos to obtain "graphic examples", supporting Psychopathic, Sociopathic and Sycophant traits it's a greater threat to humanity than the alleged threat of AI (or SI as stupid people might use in the future.), As the models that such things are trained on is reliant upon people to create the models and they themselves have to be "Model citizens" (or at least adapting to be) otherwise those dark trains from the previously mentioned archetypes will more than likely prevail throughout the AI models (Making them more likely to be a threat)

As for your personal barb asking if I have personal knowledge, no I don't. Do you have a vast snuff collection? If you do I'm sure there is some law enforcement you can share it with.

There's a difference between suicide, or suicide by cop, during your attack and facing the prolonged dread of an execution. If anything, maybe it will encourage such people to not be "taken alive" and save us all a lot of time, prosecution, appeals, and prison housing and care.
Why would we allow him to speak?

Since he's Muslim, we should grease the bullets in pig fat.

Shooting someone is messy and not something people really are going to want to see, especially if the bullets explode bones (like the jaw bone) and leaves the last instances of life to be in vane, drawing breath from a mincemeat pile. It can lead to PTSD in soldiers so what do you think it's going to do to members of society if they are "curious"?

Shooting him is actually a waste of organs and body parts, unless they shoot him in the head. Harvesting him could actually be useful for people belonging to victims families as well as complete strangers, in some respects it's an alternative to whatever parts being put in jars and prodded by first year med students.

Um... because we don't torture. But maybe you don't understand the difference. @_@

Who's "we"? You do understand there is many forms of torture right? It's not just ripping/toe finger nails out and waterboarding.

It can be for instance applying a rhetoric of Right vs Left so as to undermine one archetype of people over another, sowing the seeds to divide so "half" the public "might" stand with you on whatever shit you push. It of course does destroy a country from the inside though, so it's a bit of "a rhetorical own goal".

Currently prior to Midterms the Anti-Muslim semantics is going to be pushed through the roof since the Iran conflict has been a fucking mess of global proportion (so much so that Trumps sucked up to Putin for assistance) so pushing the country to be fearful of Muslims and attacking Muslims in public speech is trying to again manipulate at least "half" the people to "maybe" agree with Trumps war direction rather than just calling him and his AI(SI) assistant out on BS.

You will obviously put your TDS hat on, but why do you think Trump does what he does? He's using a system that has run scenarios and created simulated outputs of common directions that the sheep will follow. in other words your country is being run by an AI and he's pushing on what it's predicted to get what he wants, no matter how poorly designed or implemented that system is.

[Syne]

No, parents are not any more likely to let children watch just because they are Trump supporters. [i]That guilt by association fallacy is a sign of your TDS.

Your admission has the hallmarks of a psychopath. This isn't about some DsMDS (Dipshit Meme Derangement Syndrome) this is about how society is being warp to be more like psychopaths and sycophants by DsMDS being displayed inappropriately.

My admission that parents aren't likely to let their children watch an execution?
Yeah, that's not the psychotic read, mate.

Would such sickos not already have access to much more graphic examples? Or... are you speaking from personal knowledge? @_@

It shouldn't be easy for sickos to obtain "graphic examples", supporting Psychopathic, Sociopathic and Sycophant traits it's a greater threat to humanity than the alleged threat of AI (or SI as stupid people might use in the future.), As the models that such things are trained on is reliant upon people to create the models and they themselves have to be "Model citizens" (or at least adapting to be) otherwise those dark trains from the previously mentioned archetypes will more than likely prevail throughout the AI models (Making them more likely to be a threat)

As for your personal barb asking if I have personal knowledge, no I don't.  Do you have a vast snuff collection?  If you do I'm sure there is some law enforcement you can share it with. 

I agree. Snuff films are outlawed under homicide and obscenity laws for good reason, but everything I'm reading says they are an urban legend. I've already said that I probably won't watch the execution myself, but I support it being public. A state-sanctioned execution is a justifiable homicide, legally similar to self-defense, and you can find plenty of videos of those online. Are you as upset over self-defense? @_@

And I don't know nor care what you're blathering about AI.

There's a difference between suicide, or suicide by cop, during your attack and facing the prolonged dread of an execution. If anything, maybe it will encourage such people to not be "taken alive" and save us all a lot of time, prosecution, appeals, and prison housing and care.
Why would we allow him to speak?

Since he's Muslim, we should grease the bullets in pig fat.

Shooting someone is messy and not something people really are going to want to see, especially if the bullets explode bones (like the jaw bone) and leaves the last instances of life to be in vane, drawing breath from a mincemeat pile.  It can lead to PTSD in soldiers so what do you think it's going to do to members of society if they are "curious"?

Shooting him is actually a waste of organs and body parts, unless they shoot him in the head.  Harvesting him could actually be useful for people belonging to victims families as well as complete strangers, in some respects it's an alternative to whatever parts being put in jars and prodded by first year med students.

U.S. executions by firing squad typically use a team of five sharpshooters or marksmen.
How the Process Works

The Team: Firing squads generally consist of five trained marksmen who aim at the inmate's heart.

The "Conscience Round" (Blank): Four of the rifles are loaded with live rounds, while one is loaded with a blank round (or dummy bullet). This practice is used so that none of the shooters knows for certain who fired the fatal shot.
- gemini

So trained marksmen aim for the heart, and just like lethal injection or electric chair, there is an anonymizing mechanism, so they don't know who dealt the killing action.

Your ignorance paints a wildly inaccurate picture in your imagination.
And they wouldn't be soldiers if killing one person could cause them PTSD. Well, not US soldiers anyway.

Yeah, I so sure every victim's family wants to know that a part of their family member's killer is still out there [/sarc]. But everything aside from the heart and one lung survives. So you can be a ghoul with the rest.

Um... because we don't torture. But maybe you don't understand the difference. @_@

Who's "we"?  You do understand there is many forms of torture right?  It's not just ripping/toe finger nails out and waterboarding. 

The US. I don't know what your dirt-water country does.

It can be for instance applying a rhetoric of Right vs Left so as to undermine one archetype of people over another, sowing the seeds to divide so "half" the public "might" stand with you on whatever shit you push.  It of course does destroy a country from the inside though, so it's a bit of "a rhetorical own goal".

You mean like the UK's two-tier justice system?
How would you televise this supposed "rhetoric torture"? 9_9
Is it like the Vogons reading poetry? LOL!

Currently prior to Midterms the Anti-Muslim semantics is going to be pushed through the roof since the Iran conflict has been a fucking mess of global proportion (so much so that Trumps sucked up to Putin for assistance) so pushing the country to be fearful of Muslims and attacking Muslims in public speech is trying to again manipulate at least "half" the people to "maybe" agree with Trumps war direction rather than just calling him and his AI(SI) assistant out on BS. 

Oh, how dastardly! To convince the half that already support Trump... to support Trump. Devilishly clever that.

You will obviously put your TDS hat on, but why do you think Trump does what he does?  He's using a system that has run scenarios and created simulated outputs of common directions that the sheep will follow.  in other words your country is being run by an AI and he's pushing on what it's predicted to get what he wants, no matter how poorly designed or implemented that system is.

More AI conspiracy rubbish. 9_9

Trump is a simple man, if you're not busy projecting all your own fears on him. You should be more afraid of what we're seeing in France.

[stryder]

You should be more afraid of what we're seeing in France.

I'm not afraid of the French being French. It's who they are, I wouldn't expect them to be any other way, otherwise they wouldn't be French would they?

(I'm gathering your POV is because the French have protests on the go, which scares you as you see that as "leftism" thanks to the brainwashing the US has had in recent years. You forget that the French and their protests is part of the reason why they got to the point of doing away with a monarchy and even aided the US to become independent in the first place. That "Leftism" you project fear about, is the strength and determination that can mean something, although it would be best for themselves if they found a less destructive way of getting their point across, as it will only come back to haunt them in the costs to repair the country.)

As for the rest of your rhetoric... dogs chase their own tails for so long... how do you managed to have the fortitude to continue even beyond the humble hound?

[Syne]

You should be more afraid of what we're seeing in France.

I'm not afraid of the French being French.  It's who they are, I wouldn't expect them to be any other way, otherwise they wouldn't be French would they?

(I'm gathering your POV is because the French have protests on the go, which scares you as you see that as "leftism" thanks to the brainwashing the US has had in recent years.  You forget that the French and their protests is part of the reason why they got to the point of doing away with a monarchy and even aided the US to become independent in the first place.  That "Leftism" you project fear about, is the strength and determination that can mean something, although it would be best for themselves if they found a less destructive way of getting their point across, as it will only come back to haunt them in the costs to repair the country.)

As usual, you're assumptions are wrong. For one, pretending that modern "leftism" equates to classical liberalism is completely historically ignorant. For another, I'm not afraid of what's happening in France, which is why I said you should be. In the US, we have the individual ability, amplified by our state (if politically aligned), to protect ourselves from rioters. And the worst of these "French" rioters are anti-Western immigrants, which the UK has imported so many of that London, Manchester, etc. are no longer majority historically native Brits.

As for the rest of your rhetoric... dogs chase their own tails for so long... how do you managed to have the fortitude to continue even beyond the humble hound?

IOW, begging off because you have nothing. Got it.