Article  Clinical failure rates over the decades: Yikes

#1
C C Offline
Clinical failure rates over the decades: Yikes
https://www.science.org/content/blog-pos...ades-yikes

EXCERPTS: I’m fond of saying that the most important single statistic about the drug industry is the clinical failure rate [...] Here we go: in the 1960s, the clinical failure rate was 90%. In the 1970s, 81%. In the 1980s, it was 80%, and in the 1990s it was 88%. In the 2000s, 91% of all clinical candidates failed, and in the 2010s, it was 91% as well.

[...] But let’s think about that 91% failure rate for a moment. When I bring this up in presentations, I invite the audience to consider what the auto industry would look like of 91% of new car designs proved unable to roll out of the factory, or if 91% of new airliner models were unable to leave the ground - and if you only found that out after spending all the R&D money to build them at full size and trying to fly them.

No cutting-edge restaurant could survive if 91% of its innovative dishes proved inedible or outright poisonous. What other industries operate under these bizarre conditions? (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Startling estimate of how many clinical-trial studies are fake or fatally flawed C C 0 522 Jul 19, 2023 01:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Self esteem is overrated: Decades of "me" generations bogus pop psychology C C 1 753 Jan 26, 2021 09:26 PM
Last Post: Syne
  How WHO’s failure to challenge China over coronavirus cost us dearly C C 1 899 Apr 6, 2020 11:25 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Clinical trials may be based on flimsy animal data C C 0 620 Apr 6, 2018 03:59 AM
Last Post: C C
  The 'mini ice age' hoopla is a giant failure of science communication C C 2 1,353 Jul 26, 2015 07:17 PM
Last Post: Yazata



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)