Article  Are the mysteries of quantum mechanics beginning to dissolve?

#1
C C Offline
https://www.quantamagazine.org/are-the-m...-20260213/

INTRO: None of the leading interpretations of quantum theory are very convincing. They ask us to believe, for example, that the world we experience is fundamentally divided from the subatomic realm it’s built from. Or that there is a wild proliferation of parallel universes, or that a mysterious process causes quantumness to spontaneously collapse. This unsatisfying state was a key element of Beyond Weird, my 2018 book on the meaning of quantum mechanics. It’s no wonder experts are as divided as ever about what quantum theory says about reality, a century after the theory was developed.

But after reading Decoherence and Quantum Darwinism, a book published in March 2025 by the physicist Wojciech Zurek, I’m excited by the possibility of an answer that does away with all those fanciful notions. Zurek, of Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, has been working for decades to resolve the question of how the quantum rules that govern the behavior of atoms and subatomic particles switch to those of classical physics — Newton’s laws of motion and so on — that operate at the scales of everyday life.

Zurek’s key idea about how this transition occurs, called decoherence, is fairly well established. But his book brings together for the first time all the elements he has been developing into a grand synthesis. He argues that the old mysteries of quantum theory are starting to dissolve. To my eye, Zurek has almost tied up the loose ends that have been confounding physics for 100 years, without invoking any substantially new or speculative assumptions. In doing so, he claims to unite the previously irreconcilable. Let’s see how far his approach takes us, and where the remaining mystery lies... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
I don't think the prime mystery of quantum physics--entanglement--is dissolving at all. In fact more and more it seems to be getting incorporated into the very fabric of spacetime itself opening the way to whole new kinds of higher level understanding. It seems to call into question some of our basic assumptions about causality and locality. Maybe the collapse of the wavefunction CAN be reduced to nothing more than decoherence, but this core conundrum is not going away any time soon imo..
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Feb 17, 2026 06:53 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: I don't think the prime mystery of quantum physics--entanglement--is dissolving at all. In fact more and more it seems to be getting incorporated into the very fabric of spacetime itself opening the way to whole new kinds of higher level understanding. It seems to call into question some of our basic assumptions about causality and locality. Maybe the collapse of the wavefunction CAN be reduced to nothing more than decoherence, but this core conundrum is not going away any time soon imo..

Metaphysical possibilities rarely get culled or issues resolved, apart from converting one school of thought into a pragmatic "methodological approach" for a disciplinary enterprise (science), that ultimately boils down to members just agreeing or being won over propaganda-wise to that (naturalism, materialism) rather than proof.
Reply
#4
confused2 Offline
From the linked article ( https://www.quantamagazine.org/are-the-m...-20260213/ )
Quote:When particles interact, entanglement is inevitable. This means something for the measurement process: The quantum objects under observation become entangled with the atoms of the measuring instrument.

An atom on (say) Alpha Centauri 'creates' a photon .. and is entangled with that photon. 4.37 years later the photon is 'detected' on Earth .. the 'detector' is entangled with the emitter on AC .. so the folks on AC had to wait 4.37 years before the outcome of the photon emission could be 'known'. ??
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
(Feb 17, 2026 08:17 PM)confused2 Wrote: From the linked article ( https://www.quantamagazine.org/are-the-m...-20260213/ )
Quote:When particles interact, entanglement is inevitable. This means something for the measurement process: The quantum objects under observation become entangled with the atoms of the measuring instrument.

An atom on (say) Alpha Centauri 'creates' a photon .. and is entangled with that photon. 4.37 years later the photon is 'detected' on Earth .. the 'detector' is entangled with the emitter on AC .. so the folks on AC had to wait 4.37 years before the outcome of the photon emission could be 'known'. ??

No, the first one to detect its state determined the state of the entangled photon measured later. So AC could measure it, and that would effect what we measure when it reaches us.
Reply
#6
confused2 Offline
AC could choose not to measure it .. by accident or design..
Reply
#7
C C Offline
(Feb 17, 2026 08:17 PM)confused2 Wrote: From the linked article ( https://www.quantamagazine.org/are-the-m...-20260213/ )
Quote:When particles interact, entanglement is inevitable. This means something for the measurement process: The quantum objects under observation become entangled with the atoms of the measuring instrument.

An atom on (say) Alpha Centauri 'creates' a photon .. and is entangled with that photon. 4.37 years later the photon is 'detected' on Earth .. the 'detector' is entangled with the emitter on AC .. so the folks on AC had to wait 4.37 years before the outcome of the photon emission could be 'known'. ??

If AC wanted the entanglement relationship to be officially confirmed, they would have to wait, rather than just take it for granted. (I.e., to fully dismiss the possibility that the experiment might have gone haywire or not been conducted properly. Though they might re-examine everything on their end and still determine a high probability that it was a success or failure.)
Reply
#8
Syne Offline
(Feb 17, 2026 08:55 PM)confused2 Wrote: AC could choose not to measure it .. by accident or design..

Yes, and then our measurement would determine the corresponding state of the entangled photon.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research 100 years of quantum mechanics: a new approach is needed C C 0 110 Jan 29, 2026 08:30 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Quantum mechanics works, but it doesn't describe reality (philosophy of physics) C C 3 166 Jan 9, 2026 08:57 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Physicists take the imaginary numbers out of quantum mechanics C C 1 455 Nov 10, 2025 08:47 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Research A symphony in quantum + New class of quantum states in graphene discovered C C 0 611 Feb 10, 2025 06:53 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article The tumultuous birth of quantum mechanics C C 0 541 Feb 6, 2025 09:42 PM
Last Post: C C
  How to make peace with the weirdness of quantum mechanics C C 0 533 Nov 22, 2024 07:42 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article The Ironic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (philosophy of physics) C C 0 663 May 28, 2024 07:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Tweak to Schrödinger's cat could unite Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics C C 2 964 Apr 29, 2024 02:06 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Research 'Dark force' theory could solve 2 open cosmic mysteries C C 0 415 Dec 10, 2023 10:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article “QBism”: The most radical interpretation of quantum mechanics ever C C 3 940 Sep 10, 2023 05:03 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)