When everybody used to believe atmospheric scientists

[Magical Realist]

Hint: you know you have lost an argument when you start arguing about the argument instead of what the argument is about.

[Syne]

That you feel the need to proclaim anyone lost the argument tell us all we need to know about you.

[Magical Realist]

Another sign of losing an argument: when you claim you weren't trying to win the argument.

[Syne]

LOL! Stupid straw man. No one claimed anything about the argument... other than the fact you couldn't manage to follow it.
How ridiculous that you pretend to lecture others on understanding science when you can't manage to keep two simple concepts in your feeble brain at the same time.
Now you're just desperately trying to avoid that fact. Pathetic moron.

[Magical Realist]

LOL Still arguing about the argument, now resorting to gradeschool ad homs. Same tired old shit over and over again..

[confused2]

The history of convincing people to do anything about gases in the atmosphere isn't good. The ozone layer thing was mostly ignored at the time.. Greenpeace (loony leftists) had a lot to do with introducing alternatives to chloroflourocarbons

Upon realizing that the first completely green refrigerator was about to come on the market, the four biggest producers (Bosch, Siemens, Liebherr, and Miele) gave up their resistance to the hydrocarbon technology and introduced their own line of Greenfreeze models in the spring of 1993.

More: https://www.oekorecherche.de/sites/defau...ochure.pdf

[Magical Realist]

And yet something got done, and it was successful. Which means they weren't ignored.

"The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer[2] is an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances that are responsible for ozone depletion. It was agreed on 16 September 1987, and entered into force on 1 January 1989. Since then, it has undergone several amendments and adjustments, with revisions agreed to in 1990 (London), 1992 (Copenhagen), 1995 (Vienna), 1997 (Montreal), 1999 (Beijing), 2007 (Montreal), 2016 (Kigali) and 2018 (Quito).[3][4][5] As a result of the international agreement, the ozone hole over Antarctica is slowly recovering.[6] Climate projections indicate that the ozone layer will return to 1980 levels between 2040 (across much of the world) and 2066 (over Antarctica).[7][8][9][10] Due to its widespread adoption and implementation, it has been hailed as an example of successful international co-operation. Former United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated that "perhaps the single most successful international agreement to date has been the Montreal Protocol"---- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol

[Syne]

LOL Still arguing about the argument, now resorting to gradeschool ad homs. Same tired old shit over and over again..

Still desperately avoiding any argument... because thinking of two thinks at the same time is too hard for you.
Can't address your argument if you won't make one.

[confused2]

Still desperately avoiding any argument... because thinking of two thinks at the same time is too hard for you.
Can't address your argument if you won't make one.