The cosmology crisis just got even worse (dark energy)

[C C]

Have suggested it before, will suggest it again: These videos are AI-generated (in terms of the visuals). Seems to be the same clothes, same appearance every time. Not that there's anything wrong with having AI do the heavy lifting and speed things up, if the only thing that's relevant is the narrative, audio, or transcript.
- - - - - - - - - - -

SABINE HOSSENFELDER
https://youtu.be/_j3yBGHgvXc

VIDEO EXCERPT: . . . Again, it’s not a huge improvement. But that said, honestly, I was expecting that I’d have to tell you, sorry it went away. But it doesn’t seem to want to go away.

What does this mean? Well, for one thing, if dark energy indeed depends on time, that could also alleviate the Hubble tension.

But maybe more importantly, if dark energy is not a constant, this is a clue that it’s a sort of field that permeates the universe. And in physics, fields are always linked to particles. This means that either dark energy is made of a new type of particle.

Or, it is actually linked to an existing particle, for example the Higgs boson.

This has been proposed a couple of times in various ways, and none of these theories have been convincing so far. But maybe physicists will now revisit this idea...

The cosmology crisis just got even worse ... https://youtu.be/_j3yBGHgvXc

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/_j3yBGHgvXc

[DavidMH]

My name is David Hine and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to light speed, C.

  
           2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 71 k/s/Mpc



Note in the numerator, distance is multiplied by speed, and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared"

does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by "spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift

for Ho along one dimension only.

In this equation, directly input the values below:-

one Mpc = 3260000 light years

C is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142........

With very kind regards,   David Hine.

[DavidMH]

Can I suggest "dark matter and energy" is the Aether wrapped in modern clothing? 

The dynamic Aether I am refeering to is NOT the "static ether substance" that Michleson-Morley could not detect, but the "dynamic Aether" 

on which Maxwell and later, Einstein based their equations.

This is the "dynamic Aether" that causes inertia and its constants, and from that, Maxwell was able to calculate light speed, C.

From the direct connection numerically between C and Ho, the Hubble Tension is a mystery no longer!!

[Syne]

Can I suggest "dark matter and energy" is the Aether wrapped in modern clothing? 

No, you can't, as Aether theories have been roundly disproven.

[DavidMH]

Can I suggest "dark matter and energy" is the Aether wrapped in modern clothing? 

No, you can't, as Aether theories have been roundly disproven.

Syne. The Aether basis of Maxwell's equations id not the static ether substance tha Michleson / Morley did not detect, but the REAL dynamic Aether

that changed the kit MM used in a relatavistic way that prevented detection.

This dynamic aether causes inertia in all processes, and gives the inertia space constants that Maxwell used to calculate C.

[Syne]

An aether just dynamic enough to avoid detection is called a McGuffin.

[DavidMH]

Syne. Nature often compensates when analysing things. A good example being a bath full of water "brings" the bottom of the bath "closer", making the bath appear less deep. This compensates for light speed being less in water. The reason Nature does that confuses many. The "dynamic Aether" of Maxwell "confused" MM, who (wrongly) concluded there is no Aether. Maxwell and Einstein created their electromagnetic equations based on the dynamic Aether, first observed by Faraday..

[Syne]

Now you're just lying. Maxwell and Einstein didn't propose the same dynamic aether. Maxwell's was disproven and Einstein's has yet to be aligned with observations. Faraday proposed fields of force, not an aether.

[DavidMH]

Now you're just lying. Maxwell and Einstein didn't propose the same dynamic aether. Maxwell's was disproven and Einstein's has yet to be aligned with observations. Faraday proposed fields of force, not an aether.

Syne, you need to appreciate Maxwell, and Einstein. Einstein's Relativity was the last valid understanding of theoretical cosmology. Since then, the cosmology scientists now stumble under the false assumption the universe is expanding, not understanding the universe obeys Maxwell. Also, we now have an equation that links Ho to C numererically. That means the age of the universe has nothing to do with Ho. We simply don't know the age of the universe, as there is no yardstick to measure the size and age of the universe.. We know the Hubble Horizon distance is 13.8 billion light years.Take time to look at this carefully. The cosmology crisis is the misinterpretation of the cause of why Ho varies slightly. The answer lays in Relativity.

[Syne]

So all of science is now wrong and you know better. 9_9