Article  David Deutsch: "There is only one interpretation of QM" (scientific realism)

#1
C C Offline
David Deutsch: "There is only one interpretation of quantum mechanics"
https://iai.tv/articles/david-deutsch-th..._auid=2020

INTRO: The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics says that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realised in different worlds. These many worlds have proved extremely contentious, with critics arguing that they are mere fantasy. In this IAI interview, David Deutsch explains the philosophy behind the many-worlds interpretation and argues that not only is it the best interpretation of quantum mechanics – it is the only interpretation.

Charlie Barnett: You said during a previous interview on the multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics that “to do proper science, you have to be a realist.” Could you outline what you mean by this specifically?

Professor David Deutsch: Traditionally, science was just straightforwardly understood – and I think this is the only reasonable thing to do – as being a project of understanding the world. Understanding what there is and how it behaves. And, crucially, what there is that's not visible, not perceptible, but still affects the things that are visible and perceptible.

But in the twentieth century, for various bad philosophical reasons, people started to question that. And they tried to champion ideas like “the world doesn't really exist” – I mean the physical world. Or that if it does exist, we can't have any knowledge of it, or that we are only playing with words, or that there isn't a difference between a truer theory and a less true theory, and so on. And those are all dead ends.

They are all really promoting an agenda of not understanding the world. Not of understanding it better by realising that we're only talking about words and that kind of thing, but an agenda of not understanding anything, which isn't worth having... (MORE - details)

RELATED: Taming the multiverse - originally published in 2001 at New Scientist, interview by Marcus Chown
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article There is no Copenhagen interpretation + Negative time observed in photon-atom action C C 1 336 Sep 25, 2025 05:27 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article The Ironic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (philosophy of physics) C C 0 600 May 28, 2024 07:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Sean Carroll and the many worlds interpretation of quantum theory Magical Realist 3 1,068 Mar 24, 2024 05:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article “QBism”: The most radical interpretation of quantum mechanics ever C C 3 763 Sep 10, 2023 05:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Calculate but don’t shut up: Unmasking the "Copenhagen interpretation" cliché C C 1 647 Dec 7, 2021 07:19 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Recalling Freeman Dyson + Unsolved decay + Naive realism + Flow chemistry + Solvents C C 0 401 Mar 20, 2021 06:13 AM
Last Post: C C
  What is time? (physicist Carlo Rovelli interview) + Making sense of David Bohm C C 0 608 Jul 30, 2018 04:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Rewriting physics + QBism interpretation is not solipsism + Scary chemistry C C 0 679 Feb 23, 2017 03:09 AM
Last Post: C C
  Can physics prove multiverse? + Search 4 hidden dimensions + Violating macro-realism C C 1 1,179 Apr 21, 2016 02:09 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)