"The Age of Disclosure"...it's time!

#1
Magical Realist Offline
It can no longer be understated, ignored, ridiculed, or shrugged off. The realization by humanity of the presence on earth of advanced superintelligent non-human beings will be the greatest and most transformative discovery our species has ever made.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkU7ZqbADRs

"An unprecedented and revelatory documentary –featuring 34 senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community– that reveals an 80-year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life and a secret war amongst major nations to reverse engineer technology of non-human origin. The film exposes the profound impact the situation has on the future of humanity, while providing a look behind-the-scenes with those at the forefront of the bi-partisan disclosure effort.

The timely film comes on the heels of historic bi-partisan Congressional hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP, aka UFOs) and Senate proposed legislation for disclosure."
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
A new documentary argues that aliens are real. I'm convinced. | Opinion

"Six minutes into the screening of the UFO documentary, the audience reacted audibly.

“I have seen, with my own eyes, non-human crafts and non-human beings,” Jay Stratton, the former director of the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, had just said on the screen.

A collective gasp — the kind that follows a shocking plot twist in a horror flick — rang through Austin’s Paramount Theater. Evidently, the attendees at this South by Southwest premiere of “The Age of Disclosure” were not UFO true believer wackos. True believers would not have been moved by this stunning revelation because, well, duh.

But then, director Dan Farah didn’t make this documentary just for the true believers. He approached the subject with journalistic rigor, interviewing 34 senior members of the U.S. government — people in the military, intelligence and science.

All those people testified about their direct knowledge that intelligent life exists outside of our planet.

Many in the Austin audience, it seemed, were shocked, perhaps even persuaded that our federal government could harbor earth-shattering secrets about non-human intelligence.

I wasn’t one of the people who gasped. I’m not certain that there’s life on other planets, but I’ve had a healthy fascination with the possibility ever since Elliott and E.T. levitated through the sky on a bicycle. And I’ve been frustrated by the lack of serious attention that the question has received.

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
In the theater, I wished some of my colleagues were watching with me. My mind wandered back to an editorial board meeting in the summer of 2023. I could practically hear my editors’ eyes rolling. Is Nick really pitching an editorial on aliens?

Yes. Yes, I was.

I had just watched a News Nation interview with David Grusch, a decorated former U.S. intelligence officer with high-level security clearance. He said he had firsthand knowledge that the government has, for decades, withheld information about UAPs — Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, for the uninitiated. For me, the interview was catnip.

My pitch for Houston Chronicle editorial was simple: Here was a credible federal whistleblower making mind-blowing claims. Why not call on Congress, astrophysicists and other scientists to interrogate his claims? Who better than the paper of record for “Space City” to weigh in on the possibility of a massive government cover-up of non-human space crafts, technology and perhaps even alien bodies?

I reminded the editors that in 2019, the New York Times had put UAP sightings by Navy pilots on the front page. And that Serious People at NASA are actively exploring and researching the potential for intelligent life in our solar system and beyond.

Still, I assumed that the editors wouldn’t go for it. Journalists, like academics and even many scientists, are often unwilling to investigate the possibility that we’re not alone in the universe. The stigma of being seen as flaky or weird is, evidently, too powerful to interrogate the possibility that credible whistleblowers like Grusch might be onto something.

Perhaps to my detriment as a Serious Journalist, I have no such shame or trepidation. And perhaps against my editors’ better judgment — or just to get me to shut up about aliens — they greenlit my pitch. The editorial was published. And, yes, I still have a job. Why do you ask?

‘Humanity’s greatest secret’
The documentary blew me away. I think it has the potential to do for UAPs what Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” did for climate change — to reframe an issue dismissed as niche science into a national security issue worth intense scrutiny and public debate.

“I just felt this was, hands down, the biggest story in the history of humanity, and I wanted to be a part of telling it,” Farah told me in an interview the day after the premiere.

A story this big is only as strong as its protagonists. Farah features two central characters: Stratton and Luis “Lue” Elizondo, a former Department of Defense official and a member of the government’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. How much of “Age of Disclosure” you’re willing to believe depends mostly on how credible you find them. But it’s clear both have put their reputations and decorated careers in military intelligence on the line in order to reveal, in Elizondo’s words, “humanity’s greatest secret.”

Their revelations are as dizzying as the spacecrafts the government has allegedly tracked. Many of those crafts, Stratton and Elizondo claim, have been surveilling sensitive military and nuclear facilities. Most of the spacecrafts have eluded captivity, they say, but the few that have crashed and been recovered contain technology so powerful that it has triggered an arms race with Russia and China to see who can reverse-engineer it the fastest. This technology is kept under wraps, they claim, by a Deep State “Legacy Program” controlled by the Pentagon and C.I.A. — a sub-agency so secretive that even presidents aren’t fully briefed on its findings.

“The first country that cracks this technology will be the leader for years to come,” Stratton says in the film. “This is similar to the Manhattan Project: We developed the atomic weapon, we won the war, and it made us a superpower for almost a century now. This is the atomic weapon on steroids.”

I get it. This sounds nuts. But the strength of "The Age of Disclosure" is that it overwhelms the viewer with corroborating testimonials.

Don’t believe Stratton and Elizondo? What about Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirming repeated instances of “something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, and it’s not ours”?

Not convinced? Here are several Navy pilots who spotted spacecrafts allegedly traveling at speeds up to ten times faster than the fastest military airplane.

Still not buying it? Here’s Stanford University pathologist Garry Nolan describing the internal and cerebral scarring he’s observed in medical scans of military and intelligence personnel who have had “direct interactions” with UAP. And for good measure, here’s a Naval and Air Force intelligence officer who still experiences biological side effects from his encounter with a UAP.

“You have an anecdote that is accompanied by medical data, that's something that I can hand to another scientist, another doctor, and say, ‘Here it is. You explain it,’” Nolan says in the film. “We can argue about what the conclusion is, but we can’t argue that the data isn’t real.”

But I do worry that critics will point to the lack of a “smoking gun” — say, a new image or video of a spacecraft or an extraterrestrial being — that would capture people’s imagination. Even the insiders in the film caution that they can’t reveal everything they know. Stratton says the most explosive evidence is still classified. He and Elizondo believe revealing just enough declassified information will force the media to pay attention.

To me, these flaws only heighten the need for more disclosure. Farah told me that the Trump administration is “very excited” about the documentary and wants to “facilitate disclosing more about this topic to the public.”

For now, I hope the film gets a wide release. Go see it. Absorb the information. Probe the credentials and qualifications of the interview subjects. Mine military, intelligence and science sources to interrogate these claims. If, after thorough investigation, you still don’t believe this will be the paradigm shift in our understanding of the broader universe, so be it.

Just don’t laugh it off. The truth is out there."

To read Nick Powell's Q&A with director Dan Farah, go to HoustonChronicle.com.

March 17, 2025

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion...221720.php
Reply
#3
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote:. Even the insiders in the film caution that they can’t reveal everything they know

Isn’t that always the way? Just out of reach for the guy listening. Why is it that way? Well, I can’t tell you.
Reply
#4
Magical Realist Offline
Usually things in the govt that are top secret or classified are such because revealing them would give our enemies a specific advantage. So it makes sense that if they have retro-engineered some crashed UFOs and built some sort of super advanced technology they would not want that publicized. It's that damnable need of nations to be militaristically superior to everyone else. I hate it but it's probably a necessary evil to keep the world safe and at peace.
Reply
#5
Zinjanthropos Offline
What I meant was it’s always tantalizingly close, on the verge, any day now. Somewhat like Michelangelo’s finger of God and its proximity to Adam. Be it science, paranormal, theoretical, secrets, the final piece is usually missing. Then just when you think they nailed it, they find another potential piece of the puzzle. People interested in things that aren’t quite there seemingly spend their lives on the edge of their seats. What was right is wrong but so near. I guess this is known as pursuit of knowledge which in itself is saying we’re not quite there yet.
Reply
#6
Magical Realist Offline
There's a huge filter between us and the real world out there that automatically screens out, downplays, and trivializes any event or idea or discovery that threatens to disupt the status quo--of business as usual. So occasionally we get these momentary jolts of something seemingly new and world-changing, and then it just sort of fades away and nobody hears about it again. So we all keep floating along in our unchanging world, complacent and quiet and submissive, while in fact, if one digs a little, one finds extraordinary and disturbing things going on all the time. It's just a matter of making an effort and shaking off the stupor of apathy that the System keeps us all sedated with.
Reply
Reply
#8
Magical Realist Offline
Absolutely jaw-dropping presentation of the UAP phenomenon and what the US govt has long known about it in their "Legacy Program". UAP crash retrievals and biologics recovered. An international race to reverse engineer uap technology. Active disinformation campaigns, sponsored stigmatization, and enforced suppression of the truth. It's all true. Watch the film for yourself. It's just a matter of time till the public finally finds out that we are not alone. Then what? The ball's in their court.
Reply
#9
Syne Offline

...
Owen Gleiberman of Variety wrote, "The title of the film refers to the idea — or is it merely the hope? — that we now live in an age when the government is being pressured to shed its secrecy. The people want to know, and the film says: We will know. But if that's the case, then when are we actually going to be shown something that looks like more than a dupe of a dupe of an old video game depicting a blurry black dot of an alien spaceship cruising over water at what looks to be about 300 miles per hour? I'll believe it when I see it."
...
Writing in The Hollywood Reporter, Daniel Fienberg called the film a "sensationalistic wolf in understated sheep's clothing" and opined that "almost nothing in The Age of Disclosure is 'new,' per se" but that the quality of its production values set it apart from similar films of the genre and that "some viewers will happily celebrate the fantasy, when it looks this legitimate". Fienberg dismissed it as a “a basic cable exploitation doc done up with a fancy gloss”, in which “nothing is proven, and thus nothing can be refuted”.
...
According to The Guardian reviewer Adrian Horton, "As IndieWire put it, The Age of Disclosure presents 'the most convincing argument you can make without showing any actual evidence'."

Writing for the New York Times, Ben Kenigsberg concluded of the film that "anyone who sits through its nearly two hours of unprovable claims is a chump".

Scientists

Joshua Semeter, a professor of electrical engineering at Boston University who served on a NASA panel charged with studying classified evidence for the existence of UFOs, was skeptical of the film's allegations of high level conspiracy, stating that "I have seen no evidence that the government has been hiding anything". Based on the film's trailer, Semeter criticized the interview format, saying, "ultimately, testimonies are simply not enough. They need to be backed up with evidence. Thus far, whenever there is an extraordinary claim, there is insufficient evidence to support it. And whenever there is sufficient evidence, the explanation is non-extraordinary."[8] NASA claims however, that they did not investigate classified evidence.[21][22]

In a November 2025 interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Charley Lineweaver said the whole film is full of "these guys who are not scientists, talking about a topic that I think is very scientific, very very interesting, but it's just baloney. And I said, gaww..., give me a scientist, please."
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of...#Reception

Reply
#10
Magical Realist Offline
Well-made documentaries should always be about more than providing a cinematically entertaining experience. They should be about an issue in our time that is so pressing and yet so neglected that it needs to be communicated clearly and compellingly to the world. Did AOD do this? Absolutely! It didn't provide any more video or photo evidence for uaps as most UAP docs do. But it provided invaluable testimony from 34 high level ex-government officials who know what they're talking about and who all agree on the propositions put forward by this film. That there ARE NHI's cruising our skies. That the US govt has known about it for 80 years and has operated a well-funded "on call" underground crash and body retrieval program of uaps for as long. That there is an international arms race to reengineer NHI technology among the 3 largest nations: the US, Russia, and China. And that humanity is on the teetering brink of knowing about these facts for the first time in its species history. If nothing else the mere fact that this could be all true should captivate all of us. Unless we are putting up conscious resistance to this paradigm-shifting truth in order to defend the common status quo narrative of "everything's the same, nothing to worry about."

https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1370721351058052
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)