Article  Europe’s feelings about sending troops to Ukraine (surveys)

#1
C C Offline
Europe’s feelings about sending troops to Ukraine
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-...47974.html

INTRO: Europeans are split on whether to send troops to Ukraine, with polls showing most citizens in the U.K, Denmark and Germany favor sending in peacekeepers, but elsewhere, the idea of troops getting sucked into the war is very unpopular.

The question of sending troops to Ukraine has become a hot topic as the war has escalated in recent months and the new Trump administration has begun peace talks. Whether it was for NATO's forces to intervene earlier in the war, or for the soldiers to act as peacekeepers after a ceasefire, the debate surrounding deploying troops has continued in Europe.

The U.K. and France have been the leading countries to voice their support for deploying peacekeeping troops to Ukraine, once a ceasefire has been achieved. Whether or not countries will agree to join them may influence the timeline of peace negotiations, and that could depend on how voters across Europe feel about getting involved.

In a YouGov poll conducted on January 16, the majority of British respondents said they would support deploying the U.K.'s troops as peacekeepers alongside soldiers from other European countries. Fifty-eight percent of respondents said they would support such a move, while 21 percent were opposed, and 21 percent said they didn't know.

Reuters reported Germans responding similarly, as a poll conducted by Forsa for the German outlet Stern magazine from February 13 through 14 found that 49 percent of Germans favored deploying troops to Ukraine, while 44 percent opposed it, and 7 percent did not answer. The poll also showed that 83 percent of voters for the Alternative for Germany (AfD), a far-right political party gaining popularity in the country, rejected the idea.

In Denmark, a poll by Voxmeter for Ritzau, Copenhagen's news agency, from February 18 through 20, found that 53 percent of respondents were in favor of deploying peacekeepers after a ceasefire, whereas 15 percent were against it, and 32 percent were undecided, as reported by Bloomberg.

Studies taken in other parts of Europe, before President Trump took power with a mandate to end the war and a critical attitude towards Ukraine's leadership, paint another picture.

At the time these surveys were taken, respondents were asked in general how they felt about sending troops into the war zone to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia's illegal full-scale invasion, which has lasted nearly three years.

A French study from June to December 2023, cited by Le Parisien, found 31 percent of respondents aged 18 to 25 supported sending French troops to Ukraine, while 17 percent of those aged 50 and over supported the idea. And a 2022 Spanish study published by Statista showed Spaniards were torn on the subject, with 52 percent of respondents against Spain joining a NATO intervention in Ukraine, and 48 percent in favor.

The majority of Italians also did not agree with the idea of sending troops to Ukraine. A survey from May 2024, published by the European Council on Foreign Relations, found 80 percent of respondents opposed sending troops to Ukraine, seven percent in favor, and 13 percent undecided.

An April 2024 survey by Statistics Poland (CBOS) found 74.8 percent of Polish respondents were against sending troops to Ukraine or any other NATO country getting involved in the conflict, whereas 10.2 percent responded in favor, according to the European news outlet Euractiv.

As for one of the Baltic nations, the majority of Lithuanians were opposed to deploying troops to Ukraine. A poll conducted by Vilmorus published April, 2024, showed 56 percent of respondents were against deployment, while 15 percent were in favor, but only if other allies did so as well, according to LRT News.

Across Western Europe, overall support for Ukraine "until it wins" has declined, as a YouGov poll conducted in December 2024 found that public desire to continue backing Ukraine until victory in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Denmark and the U.K. dropped in the last year, according to the Guardian... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
confused2 Offline
The context is a few days before Zelensky either does or doesn't sign 50% of Ukraine's minerals over to Trump in return for past help and (probably) nothing more. Zelensky will be humiliated either way (Trump will make sure of that) and may well either resign or be replaced 'somehow'. Without Zelensky Ukraine will almost certainly fold fairly quickly .. so sending troops isn't really an issue any more. When the fine principles of sovereignty and independence become a shit fight over mining rights - I'm not sure so many folks would be willing to die for it.
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
Or you're just using Trump to scapegoat the fact that you really don't want to send Brits. They definitely don't want to send troops into war... just as peacekeepers.
Reply
#4
stryder Offline
(Feb 27, 2025 01:44 AM)Syne Wrote: Or you're just using Trump to scapegoat the fact that you really don't want to send Brits. They definitely don't want to send troops into war... just as peacekeepers.

tmk, a number of British soldiers were chomping at the bit to go and aid Ukraine. The only reason they couldn't just rush over there was a mixture of it being seen as desertion and of course leaving our own country with limited number of active troops. If they are given the opportunity to act as peacekeepers, I'm pretty sure they would already be packed and waiting for transport to get there, no questions asked.
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
Exactly, as "peacekeepers." Not as war fighters.
Reply
#6
stryder Offline
(Feb 27, 2025 01:53 AM)Syne Wrote: Exactly, as "peacekeepers." Not as war fighters.
And you are missing the point, they would of quite happily been over there fighting tyranny on day one as fighters. The problem with that however would of been they would of broken rank, it might of saved some lives and cost more to Russia, but when we reach the junction of needing peacekeepers to take over there wouldn't of been any leaving Russia to have won outright.

So its not so black and white.
Reply
#7
Syne Offline
Would have, could have, should have. So magnanimous to make such generous offers after the fact, huh?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Russia using museums for ideological indoctrination about Ukraine invasion C C 0 393 Jun 5, 2025 07:14 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research War in Ukraine led to destruction of almost 1,600 square kms of forest (combat data) C C 0 389 Mar 6, 2025 08:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  Russia-Ukraine War’s stark casualties: Hungry people in distant nations (logistics) C C 0 462 Dec 21, 2024 02:22 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Why alarm over Russia’s hypersonic missiles in Ukraine is misplaced (data evaluation) C C 1 360 Apr 4, 2023 02:48 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  The failed logistics of Russia's invasion of Ukraine C C 0 311 Mar 9, 2022 10:52 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)