Research  Quantum search for time's source finds no difference between past and future

#1
C C Offline
If your cognition could switch to experiencing different states of your brain and the world in reverse order, then you would be losing memory in that direction, rather than acquiring it. Thereby, when your experiences returned to their conventional polarity, you could not recall that the reversal had happened. Anymore than characters in a movie remark about such after you play the film or video backwards and then flip to regular. Because there is no alteration in the movie events, and in your context there was no alteration in your brain structure and outer environment states. Even if cognitive reversals like that could happen or were happening regularly, there is no apparent way to verify such.
- - - - - - - - - -

Quantum search for time's source finds no difference between past and future
https://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-sea...and-future

EXCERPT: "Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible," says Rocco.

If time can jiggle back and forth on a quantum level, it certainly doesn't on the scale of physics we experience. An actual hot bath out beneath the stars is guaranteed to cool quickly as energy flows out into the ever-expanding cosmos.

The trio insist their findings don't contradict this law of thermodynamics in any way. Some laws of physics are truly irreversible, after all. Yet flipping the arrow of time on a quantum scale would still have seen a steady cooling occur, suggesting there's nothing overly special about one direction over the other on a quantum scale when it comes to thermodynamics... (MORE - images)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Physicists uncover evidence of two arrows of time emerging from the quantum realm
https://www.surrey.ac.uk/news/physicists...ntum-realm

PRESS RELEASE: What if time is not as fixed as we thought? Imagine that instead of flowing in one direction – from past to future – time could flow forward or backwards due to processes taking place at the quantum level. This is the thought-provoking discovery made by researchers at the University of Surrey, as a new study reveals that opposing arrows of time can theoretically emerge from certain quantum systems.

For centuries, scientists have puzzled over the arrow of time – the idea that time flows irreversibly from past to future. While this seems obvious in our experienced reality, the underlying laws of physics do not inherently favour a single direction. Whether time moves forward or backwards, the equations remain the same.

Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey and lead author of the study, said:

“One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. 

“However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible."

The study, published in Scientific Reports, explored how a quantum system – the world of the sub-atomic – interacts with its environment, known as an ‘open quantum system’. Researchers investigated why we perceive time as moving in one direction, and whether this perception emerges from open quantum mechanics.

To simplify the problem, the team made two key assumptions. First, they treated the vast environment surrounding the system in such a way that they could focus only on the quantum system itself. Second, they assumed that the environment – like the entire universe – is so large that energy and information dissipate into it, never returning. This approach enabled them to examine how time emerges as a one-way phenomenon, even though, at the microscopic level, time could theoretically move in both directions.

Even after applying these assumptions, the system behaved the same way whether time moved forward or backwards. This discovery provided a mathematical foundation for the idea that time-reversal symmetry still holds in open quantum systems – suggesting that time’s arrow may not be as fixed as we experience it.

Thomas Guff, postdoctoral researcher who led the calculations, said:

“The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. 

“We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that keeps the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it pop up so naturally.”

The research offers a fresh perspective on one of the biggest mysteries in physics. Understanding the true nature of time could have profound implications for quantum mechanics, cosmology and beyond.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Study finds billions of quantum entangled electrons in ‘strange metal’ C C 0 458 Jan 19, 2020 01:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Veterinary Forensics and the Link Between Animal Abuse and Murder C C 0 480 Sep 1, 2017 05:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  Bad mothers and why they make a difference to cheetah survival C C 0 456 Jun 13, 2017 10:14 PM
Last Post: C C
  What is the difference between a fact and a finding? Leigha 16 4,902 Oct 8, 2016 02:31 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)