Article  A key NASA commercial partner faces severe financial challenges (space design)

#1
C C Offline
They moved headquarters and manufacturing to Houston, Texas last year. So no Blue-State tax ravaging and heavy-handed Woke policies as excuses to appeal to after this.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"The business model had to change."
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/a-...hallenges/

EXCERPTS: Axiom Space is facing significant financial headwinds as the company attempts to deliver on two key commercial programs for NASA—the development of a private space station in low-Earth orbit and spacesuits that could one day be worn by astronauts on the Moon.

Forbes reports that Axiom Space, which was founded by billionaire Kam Ghaffarian and NASA executive Mike Suffredini in 2016, has been struggling to raise money to keep its doors open and has had difficulties meeting its payroll dating back to at least early 2023. In addition, the Houston-based company has fallen behind on payments to key suppliers, including Thales Alenia Space for its space station and SpaceX for crewed launches.

[...] The report also notes that Axiom has lost significant amounts of funding on three private astronaut missions it has flown to the International Space Station to date. Ghaffarian said these missions were conducted at a loss to build relationships with global space agencies. This does make some sense, as space agencies in Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere are likely to be customers of commercial space stations in the next decade. However, Axiom is ill-positioned to absorb such launches financially.

The publication reveals that Axiom is due to pay $670 million to SpaceX for four Crew Dragon missions, each of which includes a launch and ride for four astronauts to and from the station encompassing a one- to two-week period. This equates to $167.5 million per launch, or $41.9 million per seat.

Axiom's other major line of business is a $228 million development contract with NASA to develop spacesuits for the Artemis Program, which will allow astronauts to venture outside the Starship lunar lander on the Moon's surface. According to the Forbes report, this initiative has pulled resources away from the space station program.

Multiple sources have told Ars that, from a financial and technical standpoint, this spacesuit program is on better footing than the station program. And at this point, the spacesuit program is probably the one element of Axiom's business that NASA views as essential going forward. (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Astra’s Chris Kemp woke up one recent morning & chose violence (space rocket design) C C 0 70 Sep 28, 2025 08:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Solar market faces 7 forms of corruption -- even “sex for solar" (California design) C C 1 536 Jun 6, 2025 12:08 AM
Last Post: confused2
  Researchers took key weakness of renewable energy & made it a superpower (design) C C 0 292 Dec 11, 2024 05:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  NASA greenlights $3.35 billion mission to Saturn’s moon Titan (quadcopter design) C C 0 591 Apr 24, 2024 02:52 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Can we fit the universe in a box? (container design & engineering challenges) C C 0 330 Nov 8, 2023 09:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Robotic cubes shapeshift in outer space (engineering, design) C C 0 313 Feb 23, 2022 10:17 PM
Last Post: C C
  How biomining could sustain space colonies (design, engineering) C C 0 311 Jan 29, 2022 03:45 AM
Last Post: C C
  The plan to turn scrapped rockets into space stations (engineering, design) C C 0 583 Nov 14, 2020 05:31 AM
Last Post: C C
  Why are scientists trying to manufacture organs in space? (design) C C 0 346 Jul 13, 2020 05:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Remind me again: Why does NASA need the SLS? (rocket design) C C 0 565 Mar 15, 2019 07:52 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)