Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Article  Meteorologist talked about climate change on newscasts. Then came harrassment threats

#1
C C Offline
https://apnews.com/article/meteorologist...947b47d684

EXCERPTS: The harassment started to intensify as TV meteorologist Chris Gloninger did more reporting on climate change during local newscasts — outraged emails and even a threat to show up at his house.

Gloninger said he had been recruited, in part, to “shake things up” at the Iowa station where he worked, but backlash was building. The man who sent him a series of threatening emails was charged with third-degree harassment. The Des Moines station asked him to dial back his coverage, facing what he called an understandable pressure to maintain ratings.

“I started just connecting the dots between extreme weather and climate change, and then the volume of pushback started to increase quite dramatically,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press

Gloninger’s experience is all too common among meteorologists across the country who are encountering reactions from viewers as they tie climate change to extreme temperatures, blizzards, tornadoes and floods in their local weather reports. For on-air meteorologists, the anti-science trend that has emerged in recent years compounds a deepening skepticism of the news media.

Many meteorologists say it’s a reflection of a more hostile political landscape that has also affected workers in a variety of jobs previously seen as nonpartisan, including librarians, school board officials and election workers.

[...] Meteorologist Matt Serwe, who used to work in Nebraska, said the livelihoods of farmers who live there depend on the weather, so they take climate change seriously. “You want to know how you can best succeed with these conditions,” he said. “Because at that point, it’s survival.”

It’s not just a problem in the United States. Meteorologists in Spain, France, Australia and the U.K. also have been subjected to complaints and harassment, said Jennie King, the London-based head of climate research and policy at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue... (MORE - missing details)

https://youtu.be/0NVusAVrBwI

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/0NVusAVrBwI
Reply
#2
confused2 Offline
I'm sure there are many families in the US with wealth based on fossil fuels .. I just happened to notice the Koch family..
Here's what Wikipedia say about the Koch family (I'm sure they are very nice people when you get to know them)..
Quote:According to a report by American University's Investigative Reporting Workshop, the Koch brothers have built "what may be the best funded, multifaceted, public policy, political and educational presence in the nation today."[29] Opposition to the government spending any money on climate change is among this network's activities.[30][29] Anthropogenic climate change skeptic Willie Soon received more than $500,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation and a trust used by the Kochs.[31] The primary recipients of Koch contributions, including Americans for Prosperity, The Heritage Foundation, and the Manhattan Institute, actively oppose clean energy and carbon legislation and are skeptical of climate science.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_family
When Paladin rides into town..

Quote:Willie Soon is researcher at Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Documents: Koch brothers foundation among groups that gave total of $1.25m
Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
@suzyji
Sat 21 Feb 2015 21.32 GMT
First published on Sat 21 Feb 2015 21.14 GMT
A prominent academic and climate change denier’s work was funded almost entirely by the energy industry, receiving more than $1.2m from companies, lobby groups and oil billionaires over more than a decade, newly released documents show.
Over the last 14 years Willie Soon, a researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, received a total of $1.25m from Exxon Mobil, Southern Company, the American Petroleum Institute (API) and a foundation run by the ultra-conservative Koch brothers, the documents obtained by Greenpeace through freedom of information filings show.
According to the documents, the biggest single funder was Southern Company, one of the country’s biggest electricity providers that relies heavily on coal.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/...y-industry
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Does Russia stand to benefit from climate change? C C 0 108 Feb 22, 2024 01:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Study reveals unexpected results about climate change deniers C C 1 89 Feb 5, 2024 08:30 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  The new climate denial + The kaleidoscopic views of climate-change deniers C C 15 284 Jan 22, 2024 12:48 AM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Should we use CRISPR to cure mental illness? + Can climate policy change the weather? C C 1 85 Aug 24, 2023 08:57 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Climate change is racist: Few in US recognize inequities of climate change C C 0 64 Aug 9, 2023 10:49 PM
Last Post: C C
  IPCC report: climate change is widespread, rapid & intensifying - & it's down to us C C 4 178 Aug 11, 2021 05:51 PM
Last Post: Leigha
  Biden is still not taking climate change seriously C C 0 78 Mar 31, 2021 09:14 PM
Last Post: C C
  Leftist militants, then and now Syne 0 92 Feb 1, 2021 08:58 PM
Last Post: Syne
  (Oz) PM cracks down coal sector threats + Labor’s new spin on climate change crisis C C 0 176 Nov 2, 2019 05:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  "Climate change has run its course" (as policies of governments, not science) C C 3 663 Jun 7, 2018 08:26 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)