Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mick West - 'detriangulate' this

#1
Kornee Offline
Something for everyone to home in on here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8JSGwsH-8Y

A bone thrown for the debunker brigade to latch on to:
28:50 - 29:50 David Clarke curator 'The UFO Project' (2008-2013) 'explains' the rise in black triangle sightings as likely a manifestation of incredibly persistent mass psychoses triggered by the first Star Wars movie in 1977. We all know who at SF would side with that take on it.

Given the host of reliable witnesses who would swear otherwise, Clarke's explanation looks terribly thin to me.
Just as the initial flying saucer sightings wave followed soon after the media misreport of Kenneth Arnold's description of UFOs sighted by him in 1947,
similarly black triangle sightings wave(s) did indeed follow after that Star Wars movie debut.

Is it really a case of vast numbers of easily swayed minds experiencing persistent preprogrammed delusions that keep self-reinforcing a mythology for decades?
Or, as I believe, mischievous entities having sport by feeding initial trigger events with actual manifestations that intentionally reinforce the triggers?
Life imitating art.

Another interesting thing that came up in the vid was the cases of mass visual sightings, quite near a US air force base, but no recorded radar contacts.
Contrasting with the joint visual and radar tracking of say the 1952 Washington flaps, 2004 Nimitz tic tac encounters, among many others.

That kind of baffling variation debunkers routinely seize on as evidence of unreliability, but to me it simply reinforces the supernatural pranksters angle. They can do practically anything, anytime, anywhere, seemingly purely at whim.

Chris Mellon & Co fret over the reports of apparent 'terrain mapping' flight paths reported. No Chris - it's just 'them' having some sport with you. Relax.
Reply
#2
C C Offline
No attempt to hide (2004)
https://www.space.com/302-silent-running...-rise.html

EXCERPT: The database-driven study of the Flying Triangle shows the following patterns:

-- Sightings take place near cities and on Interstate highways
-- They are seen at low altitude in plain sight of eyewitnesses
-- They fly at extremely low speed or hover in plain sight of eyewitnesses
-- The vehicles sometime fly with easily noticeable bright lights -- either blinding white lights, or have "bright disco lights" that usually flash combinations of red, green or blue.

The NIDS study emphasizes that the flying of these vehicles may be more in harmony with an attempt to display or to be noticed. There appears to be little or no attempt to hide. That finding has led to a modification of an earlier NIDS hypothesis that the Triangles are covertly deployed DoD aircraft.

While it is too early to dismiss the previously published NIDS correlation between Triangle sightings and a subset of U.S. Air Force Bases, the apparent association with centers of population may point away from a covert program. "Rather, it is consistent with routine and open deployment of an advanced aircraft," the NIDS study concludes.


At 9:21 Mark On Video Wrote:Even at 1,000, 2,000 feet, you're going to hear something from a F-117 or any other aircraft. As it moved through the sky, there was absolutely no sound at all, not even a whisper. I mean, nothing.

I've yet to see a truly triangular, flat-like blimp floating around quietly. An image search does nothing to alleviate that void in personal experience.

As far as night goes, we've seen presumed, ordinary aircraft flying overhead from "1st appearance to disappearance" that seemed silent. Whether that's due to a lower temperature mitigating the distance sound can travel, the pilots using special noise abatement procedures at night, or whatever putative causes distributed by authorities.

Historic Aircraft - Silent (By) Night
https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-his...lent-night

As early as 1965, the director of Defense Research and Engineering, John F. Foster, was challenging the aerospace industry to develop a “quiet” surveillance aircraft. Funded through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Lockheed Missiles and Space Company proposed such a platform—which soon was designated the QT-2.2. [...] The “very quiet” QT-PC/YO-3A effort was a short-lived but interesting aircraft program and a model of interservice and industry cooperation.

- - - - - -

This Completely Silent Airplane Achieves Flight With No Moving Parts
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technol...-airplane/

While it may "glide" it is no mere "glider" and can summon up its own wind on which to fly. The process, detailed in a study published in Nature, hinges on electroaerodynamic propulsion, a system that creates ionic wind through positively and negatively charged electrodes underneath the plane's wing. The silent aircraft is necessarily small, weighing in at 5.4 pounds with a 16-foot wingspan, fashioning it a prototype for any future commercial applications.


(2017) Photos of Triangle UF0 with Helicopter near MacDill Air Force Base ... https://youtu.be/59yWsUlRYAM

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/59yWsUlRYAM
Reply
#3
Kornee Offline
It's the many reports of combo hovering/slow-speed AND rapid acceleration out of sight (no sonic boom!) that Chris Mellon's team deemed eliminated secret government tech. I agree.

Edgar Fouche was an interesting character. In searching for him, came across this part 6 of a long string of interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tx34w0Rt...72&index=6
His eyewitness accounts come across as sincere and believable. Interestingly, the first black triangle encounter was in 1975 - 2 years BEFORE the first Star Wars movie premiered.
Which if true, punctures somewhat the mass psychosis hypothesis mentioned in #1.

What brings in to question Fouche's trustworthiness on anything is a read of the Q & A pdf doc here:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/TR-3...nswers.pdf
Anyone with a grasp of basic physics will recognize that in particular the 'MFB detailed disclosure' beginning p5 there, is total bunkum.

Hence, he is to be lumped in with other 'insider' disinfo agents like Bob Lazar and John Lear. Spinners of believable BS.
The only mystery is what are the actual agendas being served. Just muddying the waters domestically?
Or perhaps more aimed at getting foreign adversaries to waste time and resources on wild goose chases? Who knows - maybe both.

PS: Similarly: https://www.theufochronicles.com/2017/11...-doty.html
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Those UFOs over Kyiv (Mick West) C C 1 105 Dec 31, 2022 03:53 AM
Last Post: Kornee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)