Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

2008 all over again?

#1
Syne Offline
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/2008-over...00247.html

Bank of America’s test plan is rolling out in Los Angeles, Dallas, Detroit and Charlotte and aimed at predominantly minority neighborhoods in those cities. It offers loans to minority buyers without the need for a down payment, closing costs or private mortgage insurance (PMI), an extra cost that’s customary for buyers who put down less than 20% of the home’s purchase price.
...
However, critics of the program were quick to point out that it could backfire and potentially harm the communities it’s designed to help.

The 2008 housing crisis — which was heavily driven by risky loans to unqualified buyers — taught tough lessons to lenders who were stuck with foreclosed homes after buyers stopped making payments on properties they were never able to afford.

The consequences were devastating: Lenders inherited foreclosed homes and buyers saw their credit scores sink.

It’s likely that at least some of the borrowers under Bank of America’s new program would be considered “subprime” under ordinary lending rules — recalling the ugliest days of the 2008 crisis and supplying critics with easy talking points. Credit agency Experian, for instance, considers borrowers with credit scores between 580 and 669 as subprime.

And while credit scores aren’t always an accurate barometer of a buyer’s purchase power or ability to make timely payments, advocates worry the interest rates required to make up for the low bar the lender is setting could set minority buyers up for failure.


At least this time the Clinton AG isn't here to issue threats of legal action against lenders who don't take the risk of sub-prime mortgage loans.
Reply
#2
C C Offline
If there's no pressure from the "Anti-racism League", then apparently just another (capitalist) progressive institution trying to profit image-wise by exploiting and mimicking left values.[1] Arguably attracted to the same precipice again via blind avarice, as much as imitating that "do it over and over again and expect different results" spirit of socialism ("because those particular Marxist idiots of the past just didn't know how to it right").

- - - footnote - - -

[1] I guess this is already subsumed by woke capitalism. Maybe no need to add an informal term like "AR-washing" (anti-racism washing) to greenwashing and woke-washing, for more efficient cognitive discrimination of this specific kind of Prog opportunism.
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
Yeah, it's likely just virtue-signalling that will only affect the market to the extent that other banks follow suit. It will still harm those it purports to help, but without a large pool of sub-prime mortgages for the stock market to bet against, it won't likely cause another recession.
Reply
#4
Zinjanthropos Offline
Does somebody or party need votes in these areas?
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
Well, a bank isn't running for public office. But...companies have learned that virtue-signalling leftists like doing business with them, to virtue-signal vicariously. So a bank has a choice. Whether to do something seemingly good, regardless of the real-world consequences, or actually provide better services to compete. It's much easier to convince people you're doing something good than to actually be better.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)