Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A highly contagious political virus is pouring over the Canada-U.S. border

#1
C C Offline
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/...canada-us/

EXCERPTS: . . . Prolonged exposure – too much MSNBC or Fox News – can lead to hallucinations, delusions and loss of contact with (Canadian) reality. Voters and politicians are both susceptible to infection.

The Canadian left has caught more than a few American fevers. For example, the American progressive left’s take on race, including placing it at the centre of nearly all social analysis, has been easily absorbed by Liberals and New Democrats alike, and is now fully part of the Canadian bloodstream. The fact that America’s past and present are different than Canada’s – not the opposite; not the same – tends to go unknown and unacknowledged.

But the party most at risk from cross-border emissions these days is the Conservative Party. There’s a lot of crazy in American politics right now [...] Once the party of law and order and small government, it now often sounds like the party of anti-law, disorder and no government...

[...] A half-century ago, Republicans joined with Democratic lawmakers to investigate president Richard Nixon and, after uncovering the depths of his lawbreaking, to remove him. A half-century later, Republicans in Congress and at the state level have nearly all rallied around Donald Trump, repeatedly, despite a level of lawbreaking far worse than anything Mr. Nixon did or contemplated ... It does not get any more banana republic than this.

Yet the Republican Party isn’t correcting course [...] Once upon a time, Canada’s Conservatives had a natural defence mechanism against being overly influenced by any of that: The party was anti-American. Proudly so.

Conservatives sometimes call themselves the party that created Canada, and that’s no idle boast. But what they need to remember [...] the reason ... to confederate provinces was to prevent this country from being swallowed up by the foreign entity to the south. That impulse remained at the centre of Canadian conservatism until the 1980s.

American politics and American culture were, until relatively recently, what conservative Canadians were trying to guard against. [...] Canada ... had progressed and survived through evolution and compromise, not violent revolution.

Many political analysts worry that, if the Conservative Party’s next leader (to be elected Sept. 10) adopts the resentment-based politics of the Trump GOP, then the party is doomed to failure. We worry about something different: that it might succeed. It is, after all, working down south... (MORE - missing details)
Reply
#2
Yazata Online
(Aug 17, 2022 03:19 PM)C C Wrote: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/...canada-us/

EXCERPTS: . . . Prolonged exposure – too much MSNBC or Fox News – can lead to hallucinations, delusions and loss of contact with (Canadian) reality. Voters and politicians are both susceptible to infection.

The Canadian left has caught more than a few American fevers. For example, the American progressive left’s take on race, including placing it at the centre of nearly all social analysis, has been easily absorbed by Liberals and New Democrats alike, and is now fully part of the Canadian bloodstream. The fact that America’s past and present are different than Canada’s – not the opposite; not the same – tends to go unknown and unacknowledged.

Ok, fair enough.

Quote:But the party most at risk from cross-border emissions these days is the Conservative Party.

Perhaps the Globe and Mail should consider the possibility that the Canadian "Conservative" party could stand to learn valuable things from the experience of the United States. "Cross-border emissions" need not be reflexively opposed by Canadians, though I guess that's part of the Globe and Mail's historical editorial view: a rather anti-American "conservatism" closely aligned with Canadian big business.

Quote:There’s a lot of crazy in American politics right now [...] Once the party of law and order and small government, it now often sounds like the party of anti-law, disorder and no government...

I assume they are talking about the US Republicans. Except that their condemnation is nothing but a repetition of American "democratic" party talking points. Exactly HOW are Republicans "anti-law", particularly in the wake of "defund the police", skyrocketing crime rates and the rise of left-wing Soros prosecutors? How can they be called the party of "disorder" in the wake of the cross-country BLM riots, cheered on by democratic party politicians from Pelosi on down?

Party of "no government"? Where did that come from?? What the Republican party stands for is democracy, in which the people are soverign and decide for themselves the shape and direction of the community they want to live in. Then they elect representatives to represent their wishes and views in their state capitals and in the federal capitol in Washington. That's more or less the opposite of a vision of government as a collection of elites who decide on the shape of society and the direction of social change, then enforce their agenda on the lesser people perceived as socially and intellectually beneath them.

Quote:A half-century later, Republicans in Congress and at the state level have nearly all rallied around Donald Trump, repeatedly, despite a level of lawbreaking far worse than anything Mr. Nixon did or contemplated

What law is President Trump supposed to have broken, again? He takes such pleasure in ridiculing and mobilizing his voters against the incredibly self-righteous (and highly puritanical) "moral wokeness" of the left that he must be guilty of something, right? He's just so... evil! For all of the six years since he was elected in 2016, his political enemies have been investigating in hopes of finding something, anything, with which to accuse him.

Quote:... It does not get any more banana republic than this.

It gets "banana republic" when agencies like the FBI and the "Justice" Department become the enforcement arms of the democratic party and turned against political enemies. That's what we see in Putin's Russia. Russia still holds elections, except that we know that Putin is going to win even before the election is held since the police agencies are so effective at harassing and silencing rival parties and candidates.

Quote:Yet the Republican Party isn’t correcting course [...] Once upon a time, Canada’s Conservatives had a natural defence mechanism against being overly influenced by any of that: The party was anti-American. Proudly so.

Conservatives sometimes call themselves the party that created Canada, and that’s no idle boast. But what they need to remember [...] the reason ... to confederate provinces was to prevent this country from being swallowed up by the foreign entity to the south. That impulse remained at the centre of Canadian conservatism until the 1980s.

American politics and American culture were, until relatively recently, what conservative Canadians were trying to guard against.

So the Globe and Mail, a voice of the Canadian "Conservative" party establishment if there ever was one, is complaining because today's "Conservative" party grass-roots isn't anti-American enough?

Quote:Many political analysts worry that, if the Conservative Party’s next leader (to be elected Sept. 10) adopts the resentment-based politics of the Trump GOP, then the party is doomed to failure. We worry about something different: that it might succeed. It is, after all, working down south...

And there it is, the motivation for this little screed. The Canadian "Conservative" party is choosing a new leader soon and the party establishment that this newspaper speaks for fears becoming as irrelevant as Liz Cheney has become here in the US.

Good luck Canadian populists, I'm cheering for you! If it is to truly be a force for democracy, the Conservative party's policies should reflect the wishes and desires of voters across Canada, not just wealthy media elites in Toronto office towers.
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
Obviously written by leftists (by all US standards)...who assume lawbreaking without ANY evidence. Republicans are still about law and order. They're just not about making America a Banana Republic (which this author tries to co-opt in a nonsensical way) that uses government to persecute their political opponents. But...that's what every failing political power tries to do. How many years, and millions of taxpayer dollars, amounted to no evidence of Russia collusion or any actionable criminal activity? Democrat persecutions without any justifying result have simply conditioned most sane people to not buy their bullshit. We're still waiting to see the justification for the Mar-a-Lago search warrant...which the DOJ wants to keep hidden. And even though Garland said it was necessary for national security reasons, he still took weeks to decide to seek the warrant. Doesn't sound that urgent.

Guess what? They eventually showed damning evidence against Nixon. We're still waiting for ANY on Trump. But these salivating leftists always get out over their skis. And calling the Republican Party resentful is blatant projection from leftists, who have made being offended and hateful their raison d'etre.
Reply
#4
stryder Offline
History states (Empirical through repetition) that all civilizations fail eventually.

Putting Trump in charge (or sucking up to him), isn't going to change that.

There is very good reason for investigating Trump. For instance Cambridge Analytica's Algorithm.

Algorithms as big business, companies use them to project where and what to spend on, and no adays peoples personal choices are eroded away by an algorithm that manipulates people to fit to it, rather than the otherway around. It's not just the data collection and resell that occurs, in some respects it's mass brain washing and it's not just used to sell you a useless product you don't want for more than the RRP. It's used in politics, it was used to get Trump into power in the first place and funnily enough Trump and Trumps version of the US government turned on the person that help him there, and it can only be speculated it was to steal the algorithm from that company (and Nix the creator of it) for Trumps own plans.

Algorithms on there own aren't particular useful if they aren't applied to a system that allows them to be used, thus a "Truth Network", a social network platform where that algorithm would be able to spy, steal and a make money out of all those that are happy to listen to his rants (and read/watch the advertisments)

Don't think he would do that because he's not like that? He made billions in business, much like the wolves of wallstreet operating at that level requires a sociopathic tendancy to be able to be unscruplous in regards to business ventures. That means taking high level risks and using less than legal methods to secure a positive outcome. If you follow woke and don't break any laws, then you'll always be poor. (So remember that when you look up to rich people)
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)