Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Imaginary numbers are real? + Mass & angular momentum, left ambiguous, get defined

#1
C C Offline
Imaginary numbers are real
https://aeon.co/essays/how-imaginary-num...-of-nature

EXCERPT: . . . Sometimes, however, as in the case of imaginary numbers – that is, numbers with negative square values – mathematics manages to stay ahead of experiments for a long time. Though imaginary numbers have been integral to quantum theory since its very beginnings in the 1920s, scientists have only recently been able to find their physical signatures in experiments and empirically prove their necessity... (MORE - missing details)


Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, get defined
https://www.quantamagazine.org/mass-and-...-20220713/

INTRO: More than a century after Albert Einstein unveiled general relativity, his epic theory of gravity has passed every experimental test to which it has been subjected. General relativity has transformed our understanding of gravity, depicting it not as an attractive force between massive objects, as had long been held, but rather as a consequence of the way space and time curve in the presence of mass and energy. The theory has achieved stunning triumphs — from the confirmation in 1919 that light bends in the sun’s gravitational field to 2019 observations that revealed the silhouette of a black hole. It might be surprising to hear, then, that general relativity is still a work in progress.

Even though the equations Einstein introduced in 1915 concern the curvature induced by massive objects, the theory does not offer a simple or standard way of determining what the mass of an object is. Angular momentum — a measure of an object’s rotational motion in space-time — is an even harder to define concept.

Some of the difficulties stem from a feedback loop that is built into general relativity. Matter and energy curve the space-time continuum, but this curvature becomes a source of energy itself, which can cause additional curvature — a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the “gravity of gravity.” And there is no way to separate an object’s intrinsic mass from the extra energy that comes from this nonlinear effect. Moreover, one cannot define momentum or angular momentum without first having a firm grip on mass.

Einstein recognized the challenges involved in quantifying mass and never fully spelled out what mass is or how it can be measured. It was not until the late 1950s and early 1960s that the first rigorous definition was proposed. The physicists Richard Arnowitt, Stanley Deser, and Charles Misner defined the mass of an isolated object, such as a black hole, as viewed from almost infinitely far away, where space-time is almost flat and the object’s gravitational influence approaches zero.

Although this way of calculating mass (known after its authors as “ADM mass”) has proved useful, it doesn’t allow physicists to quantify the mass within a finite region. Say, for instance, that they are studying two black holes that are in the process of merging, and they want to determine the mass of each individual black hole prior to the merger, as opposed to that of the system as a whole. The mass enclosed within any individual region — as measured from the surface of that region, where gravity and space-time curvature might be very strong — is called “quasilocal mass.”

In 2008, the mathematicians Mu-Tao Wang of Columbia University and Shing-Tung Yau, now a professor at Tsinghua University in China and an emeritus professor at Harvard University, advanced a definition of quasilocal mass that has proved particularly fruitful. In 2015, it enabled them and a collaborator to define quasilocal angular momentum. And this spring, those authors and a fourth collaborator published the first-ever, long-sought definition of angular momentum that is “supertranslation invariant,” meaning it does not depend on where an observer is located or what coordinate system he or she chooses. With such a definition, observers can, in principle, take measurements of ripples in space-time generated by a rotating object and calculate the exact amount of angular momentum carried away from the object by these ripples, which are known as gravitational waves.

“It’s a great result,” Lydia Bieri, a mathematician and general relativity expert at the University of Michigan, said about the March 2022 paper, “and a culmination of intricate mathematical investigations over several years.” Indeed, the development of these facets of general relativity took not just years but many decades... (MORE - missing details)
Reply
#2
Kornee Offline
(Jul 14, 2022 06:49 PM)C C Wrote: https://www.quantamagazine.org/mass-and-...-20220713/

INTRO: More than a century after Albert Einstein unveiled general relativity, his epic theory of gravity has passed every experimental test to which it has been subjected. General relativity has transformed our understanding of gravity, depicting it not as an attractive force between massive objects, as had long been held, but rather as a consequence of the way space and time curve in the presence of mass and energy. The theory has achieved stunning triumphs — from the confirmation in 1919 that light bends in the sun’s gravitational field to 2019 observations that revealed the silhouette of a black hole. It might be surprising to hear, then, that general relativity is still a work in progress.

Even though the equations Einstein introduced in 1915 concern the curvature induced by massive objects, the theory does not offer a simple or standard way of determining what the mass of an object is. Angular momentum — a measure of an object’s rotational motion in space-time — is an even harder to define concept.

Some of the difficulties stem from a feedback loop that is built into general relativity. Matter and energy curve the space-time continuum, but this curvature becomes a source of energy itself, which can cause additional curvature — a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the “gravity of gravity.” And there is no way to separate an object’s intrinsic mass from the extra energy that comes from this nonlinear effect. Moreover, one cannot define momentum or angular momentum without first having a firm grip on mass.

Einstein recognized the challenges involved in quantifying mass and never fully spelled out what mass is or how it can be measured. It was not until the late 1950s and early 1960s that the first rigorous definition was proposed. The physicists Richard Arnowitt, Stanley Deser, and Charles Misner defined the mass of an isolated object, such as a black hole, as viewed from almost infinitely far away, where space-time is almost flat and the object’s gravitational influence approaches zero.

Although this way of calculating mass (known after its authors as “ADM mass”) has proved useful, it doesn’t allow physicists to quantify the mass within a finite region. Say, for instance, that they are studying two black holes that are in the process of merging, and they want to determine the mass of each individual black hole prior to the merger, as opposed to that of the system as a whole. The mass enclosed within any individual region — as measured from the surface of that region, where gravity and space-time curvature might be very strong — is called “quasilocal mass.”

In 2008, the mathematicians Mu-Tao Wang of Columbia University and Shing-Tung Yau, now a professor at Tsinghua University in China and an emeritus professor at Harvard University, advanced a definition of quasilocal mass that has proved particularly fruitful. In 2015, it enabled them and a collaborator to define quasilocal angular momentum. And this spring, those authors and a fourth collaborator published the first-ever, long-sought definition of angular momentum that is “supertranslation invariant,” meaning it does not depend on where an observer is located or what coordinate system he or she chooses. With such a definition, observers can, in principle, take measurements of ripples in space-time generated by a rotating object and calculate the exact amount of angular momentum carried away from the object by these ripples, which are known as gravitational waves.

“It’s a great result,” Lydia Bieri, a mathematician and general relativity expert at the University of Michigan, said about the March 2022 paper, “and a culmination of intricate mathematical investigations over several years.” Indeed, the development of these facets of general relativity took not just years but many decades... (MORE - missing details)
Quote:
"...Some of the difficulties stem from a feedback loop that is built into general relativity. Matter and energy curve the space-time continuum, but this curvature becomes a source of energy itself, which can cause additional curvature — a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the “gravity of gravity..."

Which is incorrect. Einstein's GR explicitly excludes the notion of 'gravity of gravity'. Einsteinian gravity as nothing more than spacetime curvature in a sense 'disappears' (sans tidal effects) when in free fall. Relativists (Einstein included!) fudge around this fact by inventing 'pseudo-tensors' that violate Einstein's basic formulation. Which then conveniently, but inconsistently, allows the idea of energy-momentum to be contained in a gravitational field. Needed to explain GWs for instance.
One has to go to an alternative theory such as Yilmaz gravity, to get self-consistency.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Might there be no quantum gravity after all? + Problem yields numbers too big for our C C 0 97 Dec 6, 2023 12:48 AM
Last Post: C C
  Quantum theory needs complex numbers + Is the universe actually a fractal? C C 0 85 Dec 16, 2021 04:05 AM
Last Post: C C
  How many numbers exist? Infinity proof math + Nanosphere at the quantum limit C C 0 78 Jul 16, 2021 06:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Imaginary numbers may be essential for describing reality C C 0 153 Mar 4, 2021 07:22 PM
Last Post: C C
  How does a multiverse get its mass/energy? + Information without particle exchange C C 0 187 Dec 12, 2020 09:48 AM
Last Post: C C
  Young physicist ‘squares the numbers’ on time travel + Mathematical ‘Hocus-Pocus’ C C 1 275 Sep 30, 2020 12:11 AM
Last Post: confused2
  What if a nuclear bomb was detonated in Marianas Trench? + Imaginary numbers intro C C 0 289 Jul 24, 2018 03:35 AM
Last Post: C C
  Mystery numbers explained + Maker of Patterns: Freeman Dyson's collection of letters C C 0 309 May 4, 2018 09:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Where do numbers come from? + Quantum superposition could unravel ‘grandpa paradox’ C C 62 9,953 Jun 7, 2017 12:50 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)