Book Review: "Evidence for Psi - Thirteen Empirical Research Reports"

#1
C C Offline
http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc...422&cn=403

by Damien Broderick and Ben Goertzel (Editors)
Review by Robert Lewis Henry

EXCERPT: [...] as the editors [...] point out in their introduction, in the form of a quote from Carl Sagan, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; to which Damien Broderick and Ben Goertzel are confident that there is much of the latter in Psi research. As the title suggests, the book is a collection of research projects and articles on the topic of Psi within a peer-reviewed context. Its scope of interest, well documented case studies, meta-analyses, and compelling conclusions certainly give one pause when considering the whole of Psi research.

In the prelude [...] Broderick and Goertzel offer a brief description of Psi and their attempt to narrow the field to a heterogeneous class of phenomena. [...] to which Broderick and Goertzel are eager to exclude such sensational topics as the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, Witchcraft, ghosts, and other outrageous issues, they highlight those phenomena such as ESP, Mind-Matter Interaction, and survival (the view that the essence of personality survives death). The phenomena of Psi [...] are argued to have real physical processes that underlie them [...]

Broderick and Goertzel furthermore emphasize the importance of meta-analyses and Bayesian statistical analysis, in contrast to a frequentist approach. The latter of these is characterized as ignoring the paradigmatic nature of the sciences, whereas the former encompasses a wider theoretical model of the History of Science. In this spirit, Broderick and Goertzel suggest that such hypotheses as Psi, furtive to specific paradigms of physics, are incompatible to traditional laboratory evidence. However, this is not to say that Psi is falsifiable or based on unscientific superstition. Statistical analyses of case studies, to Broderick and Goertzel, present overwhelming evidence of Psi phenomena...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The true story of the dishonest honesty study (book review) C C 0 156 Oct 31, 2025 09:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Consumer Reports' latest panic + What comes after gender affirmation? C C 4 433 Oct 20, 2025 05:29 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Experts warn 'AI-written' paper is latest spin on climate change denial + Peer review C C 0 524 Apr 14, 2025 03:58 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Same data, opposite conclusions by ecologists + The fragile state of peer review C C 0 423 Mar 5, 2025 06:51 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Is peer review failing its peer review? + History of peer review C C 0 381 Jul 22, 2024 06:31 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Review mills: a new science malpractice + Menace of wellness influencers C C 0 379 Feb 9, 2024 02:31 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article What’s wrong with peer review? + No, TCM has not been vindicated by science C C 1 490 Nov 13, 2023 03:09 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Corruption of the academic peer-review process (climate science) C C 4 876 Aug 5, 2023 05:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article "Whiteness" in physics: the Physical Review version of Catch-22 C C 1 395 May 9, 2023 11:45 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Is peer review doomed? + AI makes sci fraud easier + Non-humans authoring sci papers C C 0 403 Mar 18, 2023 11:35 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)