Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Disbelief in human evolution linked to greater prejudice and racism (data analysis)

#1
C C Offline
https://www.umass.edu/news/article/disbe...and-racism

RELEASE: A disbelief in human evolution was associated with higher levels of prejudice, racist attitudes and support of discriminatory behavior against Blacks, immigrants and the LGBTQ community in the U.S., according to University of Massachusetts Amherst research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Similarly, across the globe – in 19 Eastern European countries, 25 Muslim countries and in Israel – low belief in evolution was linked to higher biases within a person’s group, prejudicial attitudes toward people in different groups and less support for conflict resolution.

The findings supported the hypothesis of lead author Stylianos Syropoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in the War and Peace Lab of senior author Bernhard Leidner, associate professor of social psychology. They collaborated with co-first author Uri Lifshin at Reichman University in Israel and co-authors Jeff Greenberg and Dylan Horner at the University of Arizona in Tucson. The researchers theorized that belief in evolution would tend to increase people’s identification with all humanity, due to the common ancestry, and would lead to less prejudicial attitudes.

“People who perceive themselves as more similar to animals are also people who tend to have more pro-social or positive attitudes toward outgroup members or people from stigmatized and marginalized backgrounds,” Syropoulos explains. “In this investigation, we were interested in examining whether belief in evolution would also act in a similar way, because it would reinforce this belief that we are more similar to animals.”

In eight studies involving different areas of the world, the researchers analyzed data from the American General Social Survey (GSS), the Pew Research Center and three online crowdsourced samples. In testing their hypothesis about the associations of different levels of belief in evolution, they accounted for education, political ideology, religiosity, cultural identity and scientific knowledge.

“We found the same results each time, which is basically that believing in evolution relates to less prejudice, regardless of the group you’re in, and controlling for all of these alternative explanations,” Syropoulos says.

For example, religious beliefs, like political ideology, were measured separately from a belief or disbelief in evolution, the researchers note. “Regardless of whether one considers religion an important part of their life, belief in evolution relates to less prejudice independently from belief, or lack thereof, in God or any particular religion,” Syropoulos says.

Leidner adds, “This whole effect and pattern seems to be present in all major political systems. It’s very much a human phenomenon, no matter where you are in the world.”

The researchers note that Darwin’s 19th century theory of evolution has been cited to perpetrate racism, prejudice and homophobia, in part through the phrase, “survival of the fittest,” used to describe the process of natural selection. “There have been theoretical accounts that predict the opposite of what we found, so it was exciting for us to show that this actually is not the case, that the opposite is true and that belief in evolution seems to have pretty positive effects,” Leidner says.

The U.S.-based study involved data from 1993, 1994, 2000, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018 – the years the GSS surveyed Americans about their beliefs in evolution, as well as measures of attitudes toward immigrants, Blacks, affirmative action, LGBTQ people and other social matters.

The data analysis showed unfailingly “that the disbelief in human evolution is the driving factor and most consistent predictor of prejudice in comparison to other relevant constructs,” the paper states.

In the Israel-based study, people with a higher belief in evolution were more likely to support peace among Palestinians, Arabs and Jews. In the study involving countries in the Islamic world, belief in evolution was associated with less prejudice toward Christians and Jews. And in the study based in Eastern Europe, where Orthodox Christians are the majority, a belief in evolution was linked with less prejudice toward gypsies, Jews and Muslims.

Syropoulos posits that a belief in evolution may expand people’s “moral circle,” leading to a sense that “we have more in common than things that are different.”

The findings also suggest that “teaching evolution seems to have side effects that might make for a better or more harmonious society,” Leidner adds. The next step, the researchers say, is to investigate how evolution is taught in the classroom and work toward developing models to study and strengthen the positive effects.
Reply
#2
Kornee Offline
A rather silly and questionably motivated study imo. For instance, fundamentalists of all 3 'Abrahamic' religions believe in a literal Adam and Eve single pair beginning for humanity, and at that a mere ~ 6000 years ago. Implying they should be the most tolerant and inclusive groupings of all. Rather than the opposite. Obviously, much more influential factors than believing in Darwinian evolution are at play. The danger with such 'linkage' studies is the pressure to conform based on negative stereotyping of non-believers/non-conformers.

Not to mention there is no indication of any fine-graining e.g. stock standard materialist (no God allowed to act) Darwinian evolution vs theistic evolution, and/or sub-variants thereof?
Just DE vs 'God did it all'.
Reply
#3
Yazata Offline
(Apr 5, 2022 06:19 PM)C C Wrote: A disbelief in human evolution was associated with higher levels of prejudice, racist attitudes and support of discriminatory behavior against Blacks, immigrants and the LGBTQ community in the U.S., according to University of Massachusetts Amherst

I think that claims like this depend crucially on how words like "prejudice" "racism" and "discriminatory behavior" are being defined. Whatever method they are using to detect and quantify other people's "prejudice", "discrimination" and "racism" almost assuredly is custom-tailered to 'out' their reprehensible qualities, but to ignore the "researchers" own.

I mean, it would be trivial to make the case that being a university "social science" professor is "associated with higher levels of" prejudice and discriminatory behavior, extending not only to hard antipathy against social conservatives, but to flat-out unabashed anti-white racism. It would be no problem at all to word a different survey to capture those biases.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=gs...up=0&hl=en

This is why I don't consider the "social sciences" to be legitimate sciences at all. Too much of it is just political/moral rhetoric in pseudo-scientific drag.
Reply
#4
Kornee Offline
(Apr 6, 2022 07:33 PM)Yazata Wrote:
(Apr 5, 2022 06:19 PM)C C Wrote: A disbelief in human evolution was associated with higher levels of prejudice, racist attitudes and support of discriminatory behavior against Blacks, immigrants and the LGBTQ community in the U.S., according to University of Massachusetts Amherst

I think that claims like this depend crucially on how words like "prejudice" "racism" and "discriminatory behavior" are being defined. Whatever method they are using to detect and quantify other people's "prejudice", "discrimination" and "racism" almost assuredly is custom-tailered to 'out' their reprehensible qualities, but to ignore the "researchers" own.

I mean, it would be trivial to make the case that being a university "social science" professor is "associated with higher levels of" prejudice and discriminatory behavior, extending not only to hard antipathy against social conservatives, but to flat-out unabashed anti-white racism. It would be no problem at all to word a different survey to capture those biases.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=gs...up=0&hl=en

This is why I don't consider the "social sciences" to be legitimate sciences at all. Too much of it is just political/moral rhetoric in pseudo-scientific drag.
Agree entirely. Nice general link too. Digressing a bit but - a few associated key names that may be of further research interest:
Noel Ignatiev
Tim Wise
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are cats the most murderous & extinction-driving pets in the world? (data analysis) C C 2 109 Dec 15, 2023 03:22 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Why AI detectors think the US Constitution was written by AI (data analysis) C C 0 79 Jul 16, 2023 03:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  Paradoxes of religion and science in the USA (data analysis) C C 2 101 Feb 14, 2023 08:37 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  TaylorMitchell's brutal death by coyotes: Rare attack on human solved (data analysis) C C 1 241 Dec 16, 2022 09:01 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Cannabis is no better than a placebo for treating pain (data meta-analysis) C C 5 319 Dec 2, 2022 12:29 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Wealthiest homeowners most at risk of wildfire hazard ("affluent" data analysis) C C 0 75 May 26, 2022 06:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  Antivaxx and pro-Kremlin propaganda seem increasingly linked C C 1 80 Mar 23, 2022 10:18 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  Economists find lockdowns reduced COVID-19 deaths by only 0.2% (data analysis) C C 0 95 Feb 3, 2022 11:24 PM
Last Post: C C
  Parties lead & voters follow, rather than vice versa (political data analysis) C C 1 102 Jan 20, 2022 05:33 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Racism is a framework, not a theory (statistical modeling) C C 1 110 Jan 8, 2022 02:49 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)