Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A bold idea to stall the climate crisis -- by building better trees (design)

#1
C C Offline
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/trees-ca...ture-genes

EXCERPTS: . . . But no climate fix is ever that simple. Multiple studies have found that tree-planting campaigns don’t always deliver the benefits they promise. [...] Other scientists point to a different problem with mass tree-planting efforts: the trees themselves. What if existing trees just aren’t good enough at storing carbon? If scientists could find a way to increase trees’ carbon-sucking potential, we’d be unlocking more cost-effective carbon capture with every tree planted. A better tree could be what we've been waiting for. We just have to make it.

Maddie Hall, CEO and founder of the climate startup Living Carbon, is looking for the Tesla of trees. “Not just a tree that’s better for the environment, but a tree that grows faster and might be able to survive or perform better in climates than traditional varieties,” she says. “A lot of that comes down to how you could improve the growth rate and also carbon-capture potential of trees.”

[...] photosynthesis—is also woefully inefficient. Only a tiny fraction of sunlight that falls on leaves actually gets turned into living material—in the case of most plants around 95 percent of all that energy is wasted. For plant scientists like Amanda Cavanagh at the University of Essex, UK, this waste looks like an opportunity. If she can find a way to get plants to cut out some of this inefficiency, trees might put that energy into growth instead...

In 2019, Cavanagh and her colleagues published a paper in Science that strongly suggested they were on to something. By inserting a couple of new genes into tobacco plants, the scientists could get them to recycle a waste product of photosynthesis back into a molecule the plant could use to grow. Once they were planted, Cavanagh’s edited tobacco plants were 40 percent more productive than their non-edited equivalents...

Now a Californian startup has taken the same approach, but this time with poplar trees. In a non-peer-reviewed preprint first posted on February 19, scientists at Living Carbon claimed that by inserting new genes into poplar trees, they can make the plants grow 53 percent more quickly than their non-edited equivalents. Both sets of trees were grown under controlled conditions that differ significantly from the ones the plants would face in the wild, but Hall hopes that the edited trees will supercharge tree-planting plans by drawing down atmospheric carbon more quickly.

[...] When most plants photosynthesize, they produce a toxic byproduct called phosphoglycolate, which they then have to use energy to break down—a process called photorespiration. Living Carbon’s edited trees have extra genes from algae and pumpkin that help the plant use less energy to break it down, as well as recycling some of the sugars created by this process. This pathway was an obvious target for making plants more efficient, says Yumin Tao, Living Carbon’s VP of biotechnology. “You channel that byproduct into energy and nutrients for plant growth,” says Tao. And more plant growth means more carbon captured.

Tao and his colleagues grew the genetically engineered poplars for 21 weeks in a lab before harvesting and weighing them to see how much biomass they’d accumulated. The best-performing seedling had 53 percent more above-ground biomass than non-edited plants. Tests also showed that the edited plants took up more carbon than their non-edited cousins, an indication that these plants had a higher rate of photosynthesis... (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Biden building a ‘superstructure’ to stop Trump stealing election (political design) C C 0 18 Mar 25, 2024 05:06 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Why Li-Fi might be better than Wi-Fi (wireless design) C C 0 66 Dec 12, 2023 10:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Evidence uncovered of "humans" making 500,000 yr old wooden structures (building) C C 0 99 Sep 21, 2023 03:12 AM
Last Post: C C
  Building on the moon and Mars? You'll need extraterrestrial cement for that C C 0 160 Aug 12, 2022 08:45 PM
Last Post: C C
  Robot dog involved in arrest of man with gun + Spies warn China building space weapon C C 5 231 Apr 17, 2021 05:21 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Building sustainable cities with wooden skyscrapers C C 0 124 Feb 15, 2021 05:50 AM
Last Post: C C
  Genesis of Transformers? MIT rolls out new micro-unit building blocks C C 0 1,044 Nov 28, 2020 04:27 AM
Last Post: C C
  Backing out of building novel nuclear power plant + Could we build a Dyson Sphere? C C 0 321 Nov 4, 2020 07:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  People stoking brew that makes California burn (fatal design) + Tailings dam crisis C C 0 108 Aug 20, 2020 06:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  U.S. eyes building nuclear power plants on Mars, the Moon (engineering) C C 0 201 Jul 25, 2020 01:02 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)