Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Theory of Everything rests on bad philosophy

#1
C C Offline
https://bigthink.com/13-8/theory-of-everything-2/

EXCERPT (Marcelo Gleiser): . . . The problem is that the very notion of a Theory of Everything, even if restricted to the world of subatomic particles and their interactions, rests on an incorrect understanding of how science works and what it can do. The aspiration is no doubt noble, but the philosophy behind it is faulty.

Physical theories are data-driven, based on a painstaking process of empirical validation; any hypothesis must be vetted by experiments before it is accepted. And even when it is accepted, and the hypothesis is sometimes elevated to the level of a “theory,” such as in the general theory of relativity or the theory of evolution, this acceptance is always temporary. A physical theory can only be proved wrong, never right, at least in any permanent sense. This is because every theory is necessarily incomplete, always ready for updates as we learn more about the physical world.

What makes science exciting is less the success of a theory and more the moment when a theory fails. That’s when “the new” happens.

As the physicist Werner Heisenberg, of Uncertainty Principle fame, once wrote, “What we observe is not Nature itself but Nature exposed to our methods of questioning.” What we can say about Nature depends on how we measure it, with the precision and reach of our instruments dictating how “far” we can see. Therefore, no theory that attempts to unify current knowledge can seriously be considered a “final” theory or a TOE, given that we cannot ever be sure that we aren’t missing a huge piece of evidence.

How are we to know that there isn’t a fifth or sixth force lurking out there in the depths? We cannot know, and quite often, hints of a “new force” are announced in the media. To put it differently, our perennially myopic view of nature precludes any theory from being complete. Nature doesn’t care how compelling we think our ideas are.

The best that we can do is to keep searching for more encompassing explanations of natural phenomena, possibly even achieving some level of unification as we go along. The history of physics has a few of these, such as Newton’s theory of gravity bringing together terrestrial and celestial motions, and electromagnetism that, in the absence of sources such as electric charges and currents, shows a beautiful unification between electricity and magnetism... (MORE - missing detials)
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:To put it differently, our perennially myopic view of nature precludes any theory from being complete. Nature doesn’t care how compelling we think our ideas are.

A bit of Godel's Incompleteness principle applied to scientific theories. I suspect that there will never be one coherent explanation for everything in the universe. We already see this in the hierarchal nature of the sciences, from physics to chemisty to biology to anthropology to psychology. At every level emergent (irreducible)
properties somehow sneak in and prevent everything being explained by one physicalist substrate.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Physicist on climate fallacy: Why everything you know about methane is probably wrong C C 1 98 Dec 20, 2023 06:04 AM
Last Post: stryder
  Article Möbius strip problem solved + A tower of conjectures that rests upon a needle C C 0 75 Sep 13, 2023 06:32 PM
Last Post: C C
  Quantum field theory explained -- understanding the most successful theory in science C C 1 158 Aug 25, 2022 06:28 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  How the physics of nothing underlies everything C C 2 175 Aug 13, 2022 09:24 PM
Last Post: Syne
  A theory of everything that explains away the paradoxes of quantum mechanics C C 6 214 Feb 17, 2022 06:29 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  String theory & number theory share + Why string theory is both a dream & a nightmare C C 0 354 Mar 4, 2020 01:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Which physics question is most important? + Best explanation for everything C C 3 603 Dec 26, 2017 10:22 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Against string theory + Parasites in science have contributed zero to string theory C C 0 525 Jun 7, 2016 07:50 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)