Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

New book recasts social evolution + Orwell scores again on Leftist duplicity

#1
C C Offline
China revising its history: Orwell scores again on Leftist duplicity
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-11265-...l#pid47076


A new book recasts social evolution as surprisingly varied
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/huma...thing-book

INTRO: Concerns abound about what’s gone wrong in modern societies. Many scholars explain growing gaps between the haves and the have-nots as partly a by-product of living in dense, urban populations. The bigger the crowd, from this perspective, the more we need power brokers to run the show. Societies have scaled up for thousands of years, which has magnified the distance between the wealthy and those left wanting.

In The Dawn of Everything, anthropologist David Graeber and archaeologist David Wengrow challenge the assumption that bigger societies inevitably produce a range of inequalities. Using examples from past societies, the pair also rejects the popular idea that social evolution occurred in stages.

Such stages, according to conventional wisdom, began with humans living in small hunter-gatherer bands where everyone was on equal footing. Then an agricultural revolution about 12,000 years ago fueled population growth and the emergence of tribes, then chiefdoms and eventually bureaucratic states. Or perhaps murderous alpha males dominated ancient hunter-gatherer groups. If so, early states may have represented attempts to corral our selfish, violent natures.

Neither scenario makes sense to Graeber and Wengrow. Their research synthesis — which extends for 526 pages — paints a more hopeful picture of social life over the last 30,000 to 40,000 years. For most of that time, the authors argue, humans have tactically alternated between small and large social setups. Some social systems featured ruling elites, working stiffs and enslaved people. Others emphasized decentralized, collective decision making. Some were run by men, others by women. The big question — one the authors can’t yet answer — is why, after tens of thousands of years of social flexibility, many people today can’t conceive of how society might effectively be reorganized.... (MORE)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Sounds like the noble savage myth.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WWII: The forgotten Rape of Manila + SLA: the rise & fall of a leftist terror group C C 0 73 Feb 3, 2023 07:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Orwell's early dislike of England + Victorian cult of death C C 0 483 Feb 5, 2016 05:46 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)