Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Fast-moving star could be good as spaceship + See farther back in space than in time?

#1
C C Offline
Can we see farther back in space than we can in time?
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/...pace-time/

INTRO: No matter where you look in the universe, in any direction, your line of sight will eventually run into some type of matter or radiation. The Earth is embedded in the solar system, with planets, moons, rocky and icy bodies, dust, and plasma particles permeating our environment. Beyond our own backyard are stars, gas, and dust strewn throughout the Milky Way, and at even greater cosmic distances are galaxies, quasars, and the matter in the intergalactic medium. If you somehow manage to pick a line of sight that doesn’t run into any of those, you’ll still encounter something: the cosmic microwave background, which is thought to be the leftover radiation from the early stages of the hot Big Bang.

And yet, no matter what we observe in any direction, two properties will correspond to whatever object we see:
  • We are seeing the object not as it is today, but as it was a finite amount of time ago: when it emitted the light that’s now striking our eyes.
  • That object is currently a specific distance away from us; if we could somehow “freeze” time and measure the distance between ourselves and that object, we’d get a certain value.
You might think that these two properties — time and distance — would be equal. A star whose light arrives after a journey of 10 years is 10 light-years away; a galaxy whose light arrives after a 100-million-year journey is 100 million light-years away; light from the Big Bang that arrives after a 13.8-billion-year journey has the emitting location 13.8 billion light-years away.

But that isn’t true at all — and the expanding universe is to blame... (MORE)


A fast-moving star could be as good as a spaceship
https://www.supercluster.com/editorial/a...spaceship/

EXCERPTS: : Forget building spaceships. You can keep your Millennium Falcon, Jupiter 2, and USS Enterprise. Star Hitchhiking is the quickest way to see the cosmos. “A fast-moving star is as good as a spaceship,” says Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback, an astronomer at the University of Rochester.

The idea is simple. Allow yourself to be captured by the gravity of a passing star system as it draws near, and allow its motion through space to carry you to new systems. Maybe you’ll disembark at one of those systems, and set up your settlement on some strange new world. Then, eventually, another star will pass close by, and you’ll catch a ride to somewhere new. And so on.

Carroll-Nellenback has developed a computer simulation that shows how hitching rides with stars would help a space-faring civilization settle large chunks of the galaxy.

It begins with a civilization in the boondocks of the galaxy’s spiral arms, just beginning to reach out into the Universe. The civilization settles a few of its nearest star systems, a bit like if Earth-based humans settled on planets orbiting Proxima Centauri or Wolf 359. Then, a faster-moving star comes by, and the civilization quickly hops into orbit, riding through the galaxy, encountering more and more star systems to settle.
Supercluster

“This fast mover comes through and picks up life,” says Carroll-Nellenback. Eventually, when the expanding wavefront reaches the center of the galaxy, “it just explodes with settlements because the distances between the stars is so small in the center, that the colonizing wavefront grows at the fastest rate possible.”

This is another reason why the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) should focus its efforts towards the center of our Milky Way Galaxy, and the centers of other galaxies, too. The simulation “shows the pattern of interstellar expansion for any species, no matter how much energy it uses,” says Jason Wright, a professor of astrophysics and director of the Penn State Extraterrestrial Intelligence Center at Penn State University.

[...] The Sun, for example, completes one orbit of the Milky Way every 220 million years. Proxima Centauri is currently the closest star to the Sun, at a distance of 4.2 light-years, but it hasn’t always been the closest, and will not be the closest in the future. For example, 70,000 years ago a red dwarf called Scholz’s Star passed within 1.9 light-years of the Sun, skirting the outer regions of the Oort Cloud.

If there had been space-faring humans alive 70,000 years ago, we might have hitched a ride on Scholz’s Star. Today, Scholz’s Star is 22 light-years away... (MORE)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James Webb Space Telescope's 1st photo of a star + Our sun actually is above average C C 0 72 Feb 11, 2022 11:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Huge comet + ETs of the 1,700 could see us + Pluto's red patches a mystery + Cos dawn C C 0 86 Jun 25, 2021 07:47 PM
Last Post: C C
  Moving BH + NASA again needs Russian help to get into space + Exoplanet habitability C C 0 122 Mar 12, 2021 07:29 AM
Last Post: C C
  Unusual star + More than 1 dark energy? + Enceladus + Why Jupiter wasn't a 2nd sun C C 0 150 Jan 5, 2021 09:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Did Betelgeuse eat another star? + 1st image of multi-planet system of sun-like star C C 0 140 Jul 22, 2020 04:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Super Massive Black Holes Spin Really Fast! Yazata 3 726 Jan 18, 2019 05:47 AM
Last Post: Leigha
  SpaceX Inks Deal to Acquire New Spaceship Manufacturing Site (for BFRs?) Yazata 1 387 Mar 20, 2018 07:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  Spaceship propulsion elte 3 607 Jun 12, 2017 07:23 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  NASA Is Fast-Tracking Plans to Explore a Metal Asteroid Worth $10,000 Quadrillion C C 0 294 May 29, 2017 06:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Scientists freak over reactivated AMS star + Saddle-shaped cosmos could subvert GR C C 2 465 May 23, 2017 05:42 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)