Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Back on sciforums

Reply
#2
Syne Offline
So...you're admitting to having a sockpuppet there? You do know that's against their rules, right?
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Apr 27, 2021 07:26 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/present...od.164302/

A response to the OP in this link within sciforums by CC would be appreciated. As well as the definition of Quantum consciousness I gave in General Philosophy.

Thank you CC!

exchemist Wrote:Someone should tell Write4U about this thread, so he can explain consciousness is all due to the QM behaviour of microtubules. Big Grin


He already said what I would have said. I pass the privilege to an eager volunteer.
Reply
#4
Ostronomos Offline
(Apr 27, 2021 09:57 PM)C C Wrote:
(Apr 27, 2021 07:26 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/present...od.164302/

A response to the OP in this link within sciforums by CC would be appreciated. As well as the definition of Quantum consciousness I gave in General Philosophy.

Thank you CC!

exchemist Wrote:Someone should tell Write4U about this thread, so he can explain consciousness is all due to the QM behaviour of microtubules. Big Grin


He already said what I would have said. I pass the privilege to an eager volunteer.


Thank you CC.

Your response to this new thread would also be appreciated. http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ultimat...st-3673809
Reply
#5
C C Offline
(Apr 27, 2021 07:26 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: Back on sciforums

(Apr 27, 2021 09:50 PM)Syne Wrote: So...you're admitting to having a sockpuppet there? You do know that's against their rules, right?

Bells Wrote:
Lepton Wrote:I admit we've had a rough start but I've already pleaded my case with the mods after 4 1/2 years of being kicked out of these forums and they have expressed their willingness to let me back, so your use of the term "sockpuppet" is a misnomer.

Please, learn something (including real science) before speaking?

Must be on a different forum. Because as far as we are concerned, you aren't welcome here .. Hence why you are banned constantly.

Stop coming back.


Needless to say, that transpired and concluded as it usually does.

If there really was a mod who allowed you back (as James R did once or twice in the past), perhaps caution prescribed waiting until a definite consensus had been reached with the lot.

This is among several reasons why "Dying to get back on sciforums" received apathetic reactions.

Your hope or dream is an exercise in futility (apart from these brief, aborted forays that a VPN cannot remedy, once CTMU is mentioned over there). It might well be THE particular exemplar to plug into the general idea of futility, even edging out Sisyphus and his eternal rolling. Wink
Reply
#6
Ostronomos Offline
(Apr 28, 2021 07:01 PM)C C Wrote:
(Apr 27, 2021 07:26 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: Back on sciforums

(Apr 27, 2021 09:50 PM)Syne Wrote: So...you're admitting to having a sockpuppet there? You do know that's against their rules, right?

Bells Wrote:
Lepton Wrote:I admit we've had a rough start but I've already pleaded my case with the mods after 4 1/2 years of being kicked out of these forums and they have expressed their willingness to let me back, so your use of the term "sockpuppet" is a misnomer.

Please, learn something (including real science) before speaking?

Must be on a different forum. Because as far as we are concerned, you aren't welcome here .. Hence why you are banned constantly.

Stop coming back.


Needless to say, that transpired and concluded as it usually does.

If there really was a mod who allowed you back (as James R did once or twice in the past), perhaps caution prescribed waiting until a definite consensus had been reached with the lot. 

This is among several reasons why "Dying to get back on sciforums" received apathetic reactions.

Your hope or dream is an exercise in futility (apart from these brief, aborted forays that a VPN cannot remedy, once CTMU is mentioned over there). It might well be THE particular exemplar to plug into the general idea of futility, even edging out Sisyphus and his eternal rolling. Wink

Very well, an exercise in futility is usually the case when one falls short of a successful attempt to change the world despite their greatest efforts to convince fools of subject matter they don't understand. The statement "super-science is the death of all evil" meets with condemnation by the blind. Like Bells.
Reply
#7
Syne Offline
LOL! You got what you deserved.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My insights on sciforums are sufficient to lead one to deduce the existence of God Ostronomos 1 341 Feb 6, 2019 04:57 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)